axionjaxson
Well-Known Member
lol i like this lol
Space thread what they didn't want you to see
- Thread starter ismokealotofpot
- Start date
Chief Walkin Eagle
Well-Known Member
We did indeed land on the moon. If were capable of basic, short distant space travel, why is it so hard to accept that we landed on the moon?.. BUT on the other hand, a good amount of moon videos are fake, hell, they all could be fake. The US government doesnt want you to know whats on the mood, its not just the dark side of the moon thats a mystery... The retarded US government even shot a nuke at the claiming that it was a test and it wasnt aimed at the moon... That nuke never got to where it was going though, didnt even phase the ones that the nuke was targeting... I suggest you watch this documentary on the moon, the message the documentary may seem far-fetched but they back up their claims with evidence... It even tells you to look up moon pictures yourself and find the little blurred/edited pixels that show you the government is hiding something... check it out
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilOsZyjRvDs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilOsZyjRvDs
Chief Walkin Eagle
Well-Known Member
yeah my grammar sucks... its late lol
ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
i'd be much less worried about your grammar than your "giant spacemen" video if i was you
axionjaxson
Well-Known Member
like>>>>>>
RyanTheRhino
Well-Known Member
I don't know why people really think we never went to the moon. It is easier to go to the moon then to the bottom of the ocean. A vessel can handle no pressure a lot easier then tons and tons of pressure. Also it is only 1/6th as hard to leave the moon then to leave the earth.
You heard it here first, size does matters... the bigger you are the more you attract woman.... it is simple physics
You heard it here first, size does matters... the bigger you are the more you attract woman.... it is simple physics
ismokealotofpot
New Member
Well the video i posted with the wires was apollo 11 to video that ryan the rhino posted was a different apollo mission yes they have antennas. but if you look closer at the fist video you can see the wires.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Being particularly dense would also have that effect.I don't know why people really think we never went to the moon. It is easier to go to the moon then to the bottom of the ocean. A vessel can handle no pressure a lot easier then tons and tons of pressure. Also it is only 1/6th as hard to leave the moon then to leave the earth.
You heard it here first, size does matters... the bigger you are the more you attract woman.... it is simple physics
cn
ismokealotofpot
New Member
did you know the moon rocks they brought back got stolen along with all the documentation and research. Hmm your rite there is no reason for the us government to lie to its people they would never do that. It couldn't have had anything to do with the cold war.
ismokealotofpot
New Member
look at the lunar take offs when the lem takes off it rocks back and forth like its on a string.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Not so imo. If on a string, the pivot would be the attachment point. Any rocking I saw looked like it was about center of mass, as is to be expected by a gimbaled rocket generating/damping torsion moments. The other interesting feature of the ascent stage ignitions is the freed debris, which flies like material in a hard vacuum. cn
bird mcbride
Well-Known Member
What I've been thinking in answer to some peoples concerns is to use a carbon ceramic material much the same as used in the B-2 bomber and pressurize a dual outer hull layer with compressed ozone gas. It would then be possible for the crew and the ship to survive even the most extreme solar storm. Lots more but not today
RyanTheRhino
Well-Known Member
except ceramics are so brittle that they would most likely break under their own weight during a launch 4Gs. also ozone"it does help some" is not what protects us from the real danger of solar radiation. it is the earths churning metal core that produces a magnetic field that deflects the radiation.What I've been thinking in answer to some peoples concerns is to use a carbon ceramic material much the same as used in the B-2 bomber and pressurize a dual outer hull layer with compressed ozone gas. It would then be possible for the crew and the ship to survive even the most extreme solar storm. Lots more but not today
you would be better of with a dense metal
RyanTheRhino
Well-Known Member
this brings up how i think energy will be created when fossil fuels are running out. Building a modular solar array that can be built up over time. The solar radiation is much higher lvl in our orbit. You can collect it more efficiently and beam it to a station in the form of a microwave which can then be turned back into electricity.
Best part is with no atmosphere there is no forces of erosion so its lifespan could be forever.
Sell it to our government as a weapon, and then use the advancements in research for energy creation
ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
i don't think thats ever being built at least with the current political climates. would have to wait for a unified earth and a true one government.
this brings up how i think energy will be created when fossil fuels are running out. Building a modeler solar array that can be built up over time. The solar radiation is much higher lvl in our orbit. You can collect it more efficiently and beam it to a station in the form of a microwave which can then be turned back into electricity.
Best part is with no atmosphere there is no forces of erosion so its lifespan could be forever.
Sell it to our government as a weapon, and then use the advancements in research for energy creation
could you imagine china or russia allowing america to build a weapon such as this?
RyanTheRhino
Well-Known Member
We will just pull an Iran and say its for energy creation 