Texas Sends Armed Troops to Defend the Border

londonfog said:
Depends on what you doing. Very open ended question you have there buddy
Click to expand...
True. I'm posting from my phone and my office is like grand central. I could word it better, but if it depends then the answer is simply no, only methods approved by nanny.

There must be limitations such as I do not have the right to harm innocents in my defense. I can't drop a nuke on you if you threaten me because of the collateral damage.

There should be no limitations as long as I and my threat are the only affected parties.
 
beans davis said:

Click to expand...

everbody is racist. I see what happens to East Asians by American Blacks, American Blacks by the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant Mafia, Jews by Germans, Hutu by Tutsi. and all I have to say is.........at least 4 billion of you have go. that's it. that's the way it is, an' there ain't nuthin' no body can do about it. you may commence on, but not before Election Day 2016. machetes, Glocks, halberds, and chain-saws available on sale now.
 
ginwilly said:
True. I'm posting from my phone and my office is like grand central. I could word it better, but if it depends then the answer is simply no, only methods approved by nanny.

There must be limitations such as I do not have the right to harm innocents in my defense. I can't drop a nuke on you if you threaten me because of the collateral damage.

There should be no limitations as long as I and my threat are the only affected parties.
Click to expand...
dude either method would have to be enforced by nanny. I chose the one that allows all to enter all. Not.. I don't like your skin color GET OUT !!!! No nuke needed in my example. You go too extreme:lol:
 
my window is open, and the haunting melody of newly-released from adjudication , drug-addled, illiterate White Trash wafts through the air.
 
londonfog said:
all in... minus the opium
Click to expand...
yeahhhhhh..........welll........El Jefe likes dope. el mondago primo!

23 years away from that daily routine nonsense, but I do like some organic opium a couple times a year. I have to be careful; I fall when sober; high on Number 4 China White......look out.
 
londonfog said:
dude either method would have to be enforced by nanny. I chose the one that allows all to enter all. Not.. I don't like your skin color GET OUT !!!! No nuke needed in my example. You go too extreme:lol:
Click to expand...
All can not enter all now. Discrimination is still "allowed" by nanny, just not the protected ones. And yes, I understand the reason we needed those at one time. I just don't think they are needed today.

I can refuse to serve anyone under 6 ft tall, by law. I can refuse people with halitosis until that affliction is deemed a disability, I can refuse for millions of other reasons too.

I prefer uniform laws.
 
ginwilly said:
All can not enter all now. Discrimination is still "allowed" by nanny, just not the protected ones. And yes, I understand the reason we needed those at one time. I just don't think they are needed today.

I can refuse to serve anyone under 6 ft tall, by law. I can refuse people with halitosis until that affliction is deemed a disability, I can refuse for millions of other reasons too.

I prefer uniform laws.
Click to expand...
I would gladly fight the fight for tall people. You let me know when that happens. Until then...:hump:
 
Glaucoma said:
As a minority myself I agree that affirmative action is BS. If somebody isn't going to hire me based on my resume the last thing I want is for them to be forced to give me the job so they can meet some retarded skin color quota.
Click to expand...

quotas are illegal, smart guy.

Glaucoma said:
A far better way to help disadvantaged people in my mind is to give them the advantage of an education
Click to expand...

where do you think affirmative action is used?

no wonder you got so many likes from idiots, you spoke their language.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top