DonAlejandroVega
Well-Known Member
I think I would lean Locke... without the "God" concept
I don't know........I've seen some Hobbesian-ass shit................
I think I would lean Locke... without the "God" concept
but which do you agree more so ??? both have valid points. What would be yours ?I don't know........I've seen some Hobbesian-ass shit................
oh, Locke, by all means.......sans deity, alsobut which do you agree more so ??? both have valid points. What would be yours ?
True. I'm posting from my phone and my office is like grand central. I could word it better, but if it depends then the answer is simply no, only methods approved by nanny.Depends on what you doing. Very open ended question you have there buddy
I once smoked some saliva it made me vow to never experiment againfree line of bath salts for first 100,000,000 customers![]()
dude either method would have to be enforced by nanny. I chose the one that allows all to enter all. Not.. I don't like your skin color GET OUT !!!! No nuke needed in my example. You go too extremeTrue. I'm posting from my phone and my office is like grand central. I could word it better, but if it depends then the answer is simply no, only methods approved by nanny.
There must be limitations such as I do not have the right to harm innocents in my defense. I can't drop a nuke on you if you threaten me because of the collateral damage.
There should be no limitations as long as I and my threat are the only affected parties.
I once smoked some saliva it made me vow to never experiment again
all in... minus the opiummy experiments were a complete success. cannabis.......resins prefered, but flower is nice too
opium.........one pipe, or two small cups of tea
alcohol.........24 oz. of my home-brewed heffeweizen, or of a good micro-brew
yeahhhhhh..........welll........El Jefe likes dope. el mondago primo!all in... minus the opium
All can not enter all now. Discrimination is still "allowed" by nanny, just not the protected ones. And yes, I understand the reason we needed those at one time. I just don't think they are needed today.dude either method would have to be enforced by nanny. I chose the one that allows all to enter all. Not.. I don't like your skin color GET OUT !!!! No nuke needed in my example. You go too extreme![]()
I would gladly fight the fight for tall people. You let me know when that happens. Until then...All can not enter all now. Discrimination is still "allowed" by nanny, just not the protected ones. And yes, I understand the reason we needed those at one time. I just don't think they are needed today.
I can refuse to serve anyone under 6 ft tall, by law. I can refuse people with halitosis until that affliction is deemed a disability, I can refuse for millions of other reasons too.
I prefer uniform laws.
As a minority myself I agree that affirmative action is BS. If somebody isn't going to hire me based on my resume the last thing I want is for them to be forced to give me the job so they can meet some retarded skin color quota.
A far better way to help disadvantaged people in my mind is to give them the advantage of an education
do you really think Rob Roy is racist when he defends property rights?