you will be paying the same tax rate as under clinton. and if you made a shit-ton of money while bush was in office... well, i don't want to say you're part of the problem... but that certainly doesn't mean you can't be a part of the solution.forget the obama nation. this is gonna be an obamanation as in the monster fuck up. it fucking pisses me off that because i make more than 250k im gonna have to support a bunch of fucking bums on welfare. im not saying peoople dont need welfare.....just most on it now dont. fuck we are screwed.
I'm sorry, but they are the problem. The rich dickheads that want to make even more money off the backs of the working stiffs, the anti-union, anti-tax conservatives that think their shit doesn't stink are the fucking problem. They have raped and pillaged for far too long. It is time for payback.you will be paying the same tax rate as under clinton. and if you made a shit-ton of money while bush was in office... well, i don't want to say you're part of the problem... but that certainly doesn't mean you can't be a part of the solution.
Maybe if Bush had even looked for Osama.
Maybe if Clinton had the balls to pull the trigger...9/11 would not have happened either....
out.
Uh oh conspiracy!Osama was treated at as u.s. hospital in dubai a few years ago and met by senior cia agents. Enough said.
Was Elvis with them?Osama was treated at as u.s. hospital in dubai a few years ago and met by senior cia agents. Enough said.
That's some funny stuff
out.
Yes it's completely Clinton's Fault.Are you saying 911 was completely Clintons fault? Every aspect of it, because he (as you say, again, without ever citing sources..) had the opportunity to kill Bin Ladin more than once and didn't do it...? That makes 911 entirely Clintons fault?
Does that really make sense in your own head?
Using this same logic, are we not responsible for the gassing of the Kurds by Sadaam by not taking Sadaam out? Are we responsible for the genocides in Rwanda and Darfur because we could help those people and oust their dictators but we choose not to..? North Korea, are we not responsible for the amount of people who die there because of government abuse?
The logic doesn't make any sense, this method would make the US responsible for any catastrophe that happened, and the president at the time would be entirely at fault. You should be looking at how the president handles the situation he/she finds themselves in more than the actual (sometimes unpreventable) circumstances of the situation itself.
You can't blame someone for something they have no control over, and even if you could, what, say Clinton was entirely at fault for 911, what does that prove, what point are you trying to make, that it's always the democrats fault (again), that the republicans would have pulled the trigger and 911 would never have happened if they were in power, because if that's really the angle you're trying to play, I'd love to see you try, so go right ahead... Why do you keep bringing up something completely off topic (Clinton) when nobody is even talking about him...? You know what that's called? Ad Hominim, pretty common fallacy, dodge the topic and throw in your own to avoid answering, as if I'd miss it... come on CJ, I'm not missing anything and that shit ain't gonna slide.... stay on topic.
Well see Clinton had a choice, you wanna go after Osama, or do you want an intern blowjob? Well he thought with the little head instead of the big head and the rest is history........
,we have been trying to give you democracy ,soap,and a tooth brush ever since,and if you gave us capitalism why are you all socialists?LMAO. If it wasn't for France there would be no America. We gave you democracy, your welcome.
Good job fuckstick.
,we have been trying to give you democracy ,soap,and a tooth brush ever since,and if you gave us capitalism why are you all socialists?