the article said 10,000.
The religion of peace strikes again!!
- Thread starter NLXSK1
- Start date
the article said 10,000.
you did say 35,000 IMHO 10,000?..what's the difference? 25,000
but they're still here.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
actually the article said "U.S. resettlement effort expected to bring as many as 10,000 Syrians to cities across the USA over the next few years, according to the U.S. State Department".you did say 35,000 IMHO 10,000?..what's the difference? 25,000
but they're still here.
right now only less than 500 are here.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
I'm generally on the opposite side of you and your "like buddy" so I'd say I was on the opposite side of stupid.
I would never try to prove someone wrong about 2014 by posting a chart from 2013, admit the chart from 2014 was right there too, then call someone else stupid for pointing it out. That's what you did here man. Own it, be proud of it.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
Question. Why is it everytime you an I are engaged in a conversation you bring up UB.
I guess you really did not follow the conversation with me and oddball. I used his chart from his link. No chart from 2014 only a saying of less than 50 were allowed in. next time READ the whole thing if you want to participate in the conversation
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
Question. When he brings up a valid point that terrorists and their families could be gaining asylum in the united states under this pretense, why do you feel the need to pick peanuts out of shit and argue how many there are? How many terrorists does it take to bring down the WTC?? A lot less than 10,000...
Maybe we would take you more seriously if you actually tried to find common ground with other people here rather than letting your ideology run you blindly into walls.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
To show you what side each of us were on. You and your like buddy that I didn't name, or pretty much everyone else.
You said this
I laughed because you had the info right there to disprove him by your own words but used a chart from a year he wasn't talking about as your proof.
Own it man, that's on you. Then you called me stupid for pointing it out, yep that's on you too. Fun times with LF folks.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
THE STATS...did not say chart. The stats said 326 were actually settled here in 2014. The chart from his link was from 2013. again read the conversation and the article if you wish to participate. Right now you seem to want to go against me just to go against me. It makes you look like you are clueless...and stop bringing up UB when he is not even around, that makes you look like he stays in your head constantly.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
what point did he bring up about terrorists? are we now calling refugees terrorist ? Well I guess if we called the victims from Katrina refugees
We can start calling refugees terrorist.Again who brought down the WTC ?
nitro harley
Well-Known Member
ginwilly.
Thats kinda the way I read it also. That info is over a year old. A lot has happened sense then, thats for sure.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
I'm sorry you don't see the opportunity you had there but failed to grasp.
"I know the claim you made about 2014 was wrong, I have the stats right here to prove it, but I'm going to use a chart of 2013 as my proof instead, see how smart I am?" "you just don't get it".
londonfog
Well-Known Member
actually Oddball never stated a year only that 35,000 Syrian were quietly let into the USA. I covered all grounds. Sorry you want to side with stupid in order to attempt to one up me..MAJOR FAIL on your part.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
the united states has killed more muslim civilians than all muslim nations combined.
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
you did say 35,000 IMHO 10,000?..what's the difference? 25,000
but they're still here.
I have a problem with the word...you. See I did not say 35,000 the story did. If you (there`s that word again) claim I said it, that does not make it true, it makes twisters that spin. The story is not being debated, the numbers that each news outlet is. I did not come up with any of the numbers. That`s why you missed the 75,000 in the first link and focused on the second link. Imagine if I provided all the sites I read the story on, .....what would you spin it into ? I chose the number in the middle because some will inflate and some will debunk, so the middle numbers are prolly more accurate.
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
We`ve also killed more Germans than anyone else as well, because when we go out to kill, no-one even comes close to our troops capabilities. Do you have a problem with being the best ?
Parsley85
Well-Known Member
I am more inclined to say the United States needs to use the Air Force, and carpet bomb the entire middle east. From their farmland to their cities. Leave nothing left standing. Then when the smoke clears, send in the marines, followed by 10,000 foot soldiers. Go door to door and exterminate any survivors.
Similar threads
