the truest words ever spoken in american politics

are you upset?

  • yes

    Votes: 3 60.0%

  • yes

    Votes: 4 80.0%
  • Total voters
    5
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
silly man, I have no problem using the authority to put a pedophile in jail. In most cases that would be the best way to handle it , so as to not fuck up your own life.
Nice try with the distraction, but the question still remains.
If you knew that your neighbor was fucking girls ages from 10 -15 you would not get involved, unless the child was seeking your help ?
Click to expand...

Okay, say a person has the capacity to consent to something and they do. Further, what they are consenting to is illegal, yet it doesn't involve anyone but people with the capacity to consent to it , would you then turn them into the "authorities" ? Do you endorse intervening in the lives of people that can and do consent to something that you disapprove of, but that doesn't involve you or others?

Also I ask the question above in a generic way, since all of you guys seem to be a little too interested in talking about diddling kids.


If I knew somebody was actively involved in harming a person (initiating aggression in an act of offense) and I see it, I would likely try to help the person being harmed. I have broken up fights when I knew that a person was being victimized etc.

Again, for the record and much to your disappointment...I don't approve of beer swilling men your age having relations with young girls that you seem so eager to talk about.


Now I will answer your question.

Of course there are some circumstances where I would modify my actions, for instance, if there were police thugs armed and dangerous beating the crap out of somebody, I would probably record it rather than jump in and get myself killed.


I bet you have a hard time with the question I asked you above or that you ignore it.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Blunted 4 lyfe said:
Are you for real man? Fuck getting a cop you handle shit, you put in some "work", end of story! Pedophiles don't carry weapons they're cowards, they're pussies you can't handle a pussy?

I'm 6'4" north of 260 lbs I definitely have no problems to put in some "work"! With my hand fuck"tools"! But my hero was my Dad but I emulated Muhammad Ali for years I was at his weight when he won the title from Sonny Listen.

Sandusky is not a place he was convicted for pedophelia, he was a football coach out of Penn State who led a double life as a pedophile. Testimony from one person was he took a kid into the shower and heard a skin on skin slapping noise. I was angry as hell when the witness said that, he was supposed to get involved right then.
But I can somewhat understand because he was a kid and a victim.


B4L
Click to expand...

You sound like quite the bad ass. I pissed my pants just reading your post.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Rob Roy
Why do you think sex between a child and an adult should be legal?
Click to expand...

Malformed and out of context question when addressing me.

I don't believe in the same superstition that you do, wherein things that are "legal" are automatically "good" and things which are illegal are automatically "bad".

If I had to venture a guess, I'd say you are a Prohibitionist.

If you had said what are my thoughts on it, I would say I disapprove of it.
 
Blunted 4 lyfe

Blunted 4 lyfe

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
You sound like quite the bad ass. I pissed my pants just reading your post.
Click to expand...
I'm just telling you what I would do in response to your question of what would I do if I saw some shit like you described, us big guys are less inclined to use any force against others because we have the confidence to handle business but even if you were small in stature you don't let shit like that happen. Ever heard the term "he's a big teddy bear" well that's who I am.

B4L
 
Blunted 4 lyfe

Blunted 4 lyfe

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Okay, say a person has the capacity to consent to something and they do. Further, what they are consenting to is illegal, yet it doesn't involve anyone but people with the capacity to consent to it , would you then turn them into the "authorities" ? Do you endorse intervening in the lives of people that can and do consent to something that you disapprove of, but that doesn't involve you or others?

Also I ask the question above in a generic way, since all of you guys seem to be a little too interested in talking about diddling kids.


If I knew somebody was actively involved in harming a person (initiating aggression in an act of offense) and I see it, I would likely try to help the person being harmed. I have broken up fights when I knew that a person was being victimized etc.

Again, for the record and much to your disappointment...I don't approve of beer swilling men your age having relations with young girls that you seem so eager to talk about.


Now I will answer your question.

Of course there are some circumstances where I would modify my actions, for instance, if there were police thugs armed and dangerous beating the crap out of somebody, I would probably record it rather than jump in and get myself killed.


I bet you have a hard time with the question I asked you above or that you ignore it.
Click to expand...
If it were 2 adults who consent, who gives a fuck but when an adult and a minor were involved I wouldn't be picking up a phone and calling the police I would save taxpayers money supporting this creep in punk city.

B4L
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Okay, say a person has the capacity to consent to something and they do. Further, what they are consenting to is illegal, yet it doesn't involve anyone but people with the capacity to consent to it , would you then turn them into the "authorities" ? Do you endorse intervening in the lives of people that can and do consent to something that you disapprove of, but that doesn't involve you or others?

Also I ask the question above in a generic way, since all of you guys seem to be a little too interested in talking about diddling kids.


If I knew somebody was actively involved in harming a person (initiating aggression in an act of offense) and I see it, I would likely try to help the person being harmed. I have broken up fights when I knew that a person was being victimized etc.

Again, for the record and much to your disappointment...I don't approve of beer swilling men your age having relations with young girls that you seem so eager to talk about.


Now I will answer your question.

Of course there are some circumstances where I would modify my actions, for instance, if there were police thugs armed and dangerous beating the crap out of somebody, I would probably record it rather than jump in and get myself killed.


I bet you have a hard time with the question I asked you above or that you ignore it.
Click to expand...
Why do you think pedophilia should be legal?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Why do you think pedophilia should be legal?
Click to expand...
Again, my beliefs don't include "legality" or "illegality" as benchmarks for what is right or wrong.

I've already said, I disapprove of your trysts with the baby sitter, but if he or she is capable of consenting to your carnal needs and desires, it's none of my business to stop you.


On the other hand, you DO espouse legality and illegality as some kind of morality based thing.

So, I have to ask you why you advocate for jailing people for cannabis related activity, Prohibitionist?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Blunted 4 lyfe said:
I'm just telling you what I would do in response to your question of what would I do if I saw some shit like you described, us big guys are less inclined to use any force against others because we have the confidence to handle business but even if you were small in stature you don't let shit like that happen. Ever heard the term "he's a big teddy bear" well that's who I am.

B4L
Click to expand...
Well, little fella, if you want to know the truth, I didn't really piss my pants.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Okay, say a person has the capacity to consent to something and they do. Further, what they are consenting to is illegal, yet it doesn't involve anyone but people with the capacity to consent to it , would you then turn them into the "authorities" ? Do you endorse intervening in the lives of people that can and do consent to something that you disapprove of, but that doesn't involve you or others?

Also I ask the question above in a generic way, since all of you guys seem to be a little too interested in talking about diddling kids.


If I knew somebody was actively involved in harming a person (initiating aggression in an act of offense) and I see it, I would likely try to help the person being harmed. I have broken up fights when I knew that a person was being victimized etc.

Again, for the record and much to your disappointment...I don't approve of beer swilling men your age having relations with young girls that you seem so eager to talk about.


Now I will answer your question.

Of course there are some circumstances where I would modify my actions, for instance, if there were police thugs armed and dangerous beating the crap out of somebody, I would probably record it rather than jump in and get myself killed.


I bet you have a hard time with the question I asked you above or that you ignore it.
Click to expand...
TLDR..I ask a simple question.
No need for a long winded reply, that probably didn't answer the question anyway. Lets try again and keep you answer to under ten words please.

If you knew that your neighbor was fucking girls ages from 10 -15 you would not get involved, unless the child was seeking your help ?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
TLDR..I ask a simple question.
No need for a long winded reply, that probably didn't answer the question anyway. Lets try again and keep you answer to under ten words please.

If you knew that your neighbor was fucking girls ages from 10 -15 you would not get involved, unless the child was seeking your help ?
Click to expand...

Can a person delegate a right they do possess?


(that's 9 words by the way)
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
do you not like them for what disgusting things they do to children or do you not like them because you view them as competition.
Just seeking clarity.
Click to expand...


I don't like them, because I have a personal bias and a cultural bias against their actions.

None of that gives me a right to intervene in what other people do, if they are people who are able to consent and do consent to things which I personally find objectionable. It doesn't give you that right either. This is true in nearly any circumstance, even when we aren't talking about your favorite subject.
 
Last edited:
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I don't like them, because I have a personal bias and a cultural bias against their actions.

None of that gives me a right to intervene in what other people do, if they are people who are able to consent and do consent to things which I personally find objectionable. It doesn't give you that right either. This is true in nearly any circumstance, even when we aren't talking about your favorite subject.
Click to expand...
you should have just stopped at the first sentence.
You do have a right to intervene if you knew a pedophile was hurting our children.
 
srh88

srh88

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I don't like them, because I have a personal bias and a cultural bias against their actions.

None of that gives me a right to intervene in what other people do, if they are people who are able to consent and do consent to things which I personally find objectionable. It doesn't give you that right either. This is true in nearly any circumstance, even when we aren't talking about your favorite subject.
Click to expand...
you are a bitch. you'd sit by and let a kid get fucked?. whats wrong with you?.. if a kid consents its probably not for the right reason which will inevitably fuck that kids head all up in the future. you wont intervene.... because youre a pussy, thats what it is. you support pedophiles. its not about the law.. its about what is right. dont bother replying to my post with some long winded bullshit. i already know what you are
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
you should have just stopped at the first sentence.
You do have a right to intervene if you knew a pedophile was hurting our children.
Click to expand...

However, you are arguing with yourself now. You are attempting to rebut something I DIDN'T say.

I said, we don't have a right to interfere in what other CONSENTING people do. That assumes an ability to consent is present in the involved participants and the actions don't take away other peoples rights.

It seems you have failed to distinguish between when a person is involved in a consensual relationship and when they aren't. Your argument says there is no difference, and attempts to put words in my mouth.

I don't favor anyone hurting anybody nor do I favor people that do harm others. I thought that was clear by now.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
srh88 said:
you are a bitch. you'd sit by and let a kid get fucked?. whats wrong with you?.. if a kid consents its probably not for the right reason which will inevitably fuck that kids head all up in the future. you wont intervene.... because youre a pussy, thats what it is. you support pedophiles. its not about the law.. its about what is right. dont bother replying to my post with some long winded bullshit. i already know what you are
Click to expand...
I see that reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

Of course it is about what is right, that's why if a PERSON is CAPABLE of consenting to something, (meaning they have the mental wherewithal) I have no right to determine their actions IF their actions don't include other people or others property etc.

You are advancing a Prohibitionist mindset argument by the way.

Also, I don't support pedophiles any more than I support foaming at the mouth people with poor comprehension skills.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
However, you are arguing with yourself now. You are attempting to rebut something I DIDN'T say.

I said, we don't have a right to interfere in what other CONSENTING people do. That assumes an ability to consent is present in the involved participants and the actions don't take away other peoples rights.

It seems you have failed to distinguish between when a person is involved in a consensual relationship and when they aren't. Your argument says there is no difference, and attempts to put words in my mouth.

I don't favor anyone hurting anybody nor do I favor people that do harm others. I thought that was clear by now.
Click to expand...
You once said that a 13 year old can consent to sex with an adult. Do you still believe a 13 year old can consent to sex with an adult ? and does that mean you would not get involved if you knew your neighbor indulged in such behavior.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top