FYI, CO2 will be a limiting factor and make that much light a waste, without supplementation or plentiful ventilation sources from outside the house (or you leave windows open), if your grow is 5 sq ft (2'x2.5'). If it is that small, asking 80 dry grams per square foot is probably a pipe dream. But again, and sincerely, good luck, and put up a journal on that grow.I went with the 400 cause i have about 5 sq ft of tent to grow in. That is still over 80w per sq ft. As long as I keep the light close I should be able to get close to a gram per watt from my 18 plant sog.
600 is my next step though. Will have to move first.
Yes they do.This may be an ignorant question - but dont the cool tube reflectors reflect less light back down?
And I appreciate the post. +rep! You mind taking a look at my cab and telling me whats best for my situation? I have the cool tube thing in mind but I always wonder'd how much is actually being lost because it would be just to good to be true to be a "cool light" kicking out that much energy? My cab is in a closet and QUIET, COOL & ODORLESS are my priorities. I was thinking about doing a cooltube/carbon scrubber combo. Only, problem is that like a fews bux and wasted hours later... am I gonna regret that shit? lolCooltubes and their ilk suck. It's on of the worst designs ever. As stated, re internal reflector is a joke, but putting on an external reflector is only marginally better. In order for much of the light to reach your garden, it must pass through the bulbs glass, the cool tubes glass , off the reflector, back down through cooltube glass, and past the bulb through the cooltube again. Pretty cappy since that glass takes 10-20% each time, as well as slightly altering spectrum unless your cooltube happens to be made of tempered low lead glass, which it isn't. Cooltubes do one thing good, cool, everything else about them is subpar. There are much better ducted reflectors on the market. I know it's too late for this grow, by next time factor in geometry and physics into your purchase. Lots of people will tout how awesome cooltubes are, but science trumps anecdote anyday.
I disagree...Pull the air through, do not push... pulling is more efficient. Go with a cool tube, it controls temp better, and will probably make it cheaper than running the AC while improving plant yield.
Lol, have you ever actually calculated the difference in the density of air between 70º F degrees and 90º F? Have a go at that tell us how many cfm that translates to. And have you ever confirmed with a fan manufacturer that warm air will cause their fans to fail prematurely or are you just guessing?I disagree...
Pushing cool air is better than sucking hot air....
Putting your cooltube fan BEFORE the light.... will allow it to work with cooler air...
Cooler air is denser, allowing the fan to move more air...
Cooler air is also beneficial to your fan's longevity... running hot air over your electric motor will cause premature failure...
No I have not... and I don't really want to know what the difference is...Lol, have you ever actually calculated the difference in the density of air between 70º F degrees and 90º F? Have a go at that tell us how many cfm that translates to.
I take it you have not been around a lot of equipment in your life (I could be wrong)...And have you ever confirmed with a fan manufacturer that warm air will cause their fans to fail prematurely or are you just guessing?
I'm thought about making a cool tube/air scrubber combo. In your opinion would it be smarter to put the fan inside the cab or outside the cab?No I have not... and I don't really want to know what the difference is...
The fact that there is a difference, is enough for me...
Why would anyone choose the less effective way???
Even if by a small margin, more efficient is more efficient... and that is the direction I want my op to go... more efficient....
I take it you have not been around a lot of equipment in your life (I could be wrong)...
Electric motors, or any motor for that matter, will fail prematurely if allowed to overheat all the time....
All else being equal, a motor that runs hot will not last as long as one that runs cool...
Hey man... it's all good... you can put your fan anywhere you like....
But when someone comes here and says it is more efficient... I call it BS...
Cheers...
It all depends on your growspace...I'm thought about making a cool tube/air scrubber combo. In your opinion would it be smarter to put the fan inside the cab or outside the cab?
I'll take this edit of your post one point at a time. If you were concerned with maximizing efficiency, you would not use cooltubes, especialy homemade from glass designed to bake bread not pass light. The physics and geometry involved show cooltubes to be inefficient, and my own tests using an Apogee Quantum meter, show the glass to bock the most light in the red and blue spectrums. Sorry.Even if by a small margin, more efficient is more efficient... and that is the direction I want my op to go... more efficient....
I take it you have not been around a lot of equipment in your life (I could be wrong)...
Electric motors, or any motor for that matter, will fail prematurely if allowed to overheat all the time....
All else being equal, a motor that runs hot will not last as long as one that runs cool...
...
Right on man... I appreciate you taking the time...I'll take this edit of your post one point at a time.
Well, in my situation, it works pretty damn good... there is no way I could be running a 600 HPS inside of my tent without air cooling... and as it happens, the cool tube fits the tent much better than my other reflector...If you were concerned with maximizing efficiency, you would not use cooltubes,
I do have a cooltube from HTG... and plan on using a batwing...especialy homemade from glass designed to bake bread not pass light.
Could you elaborate?The physics and geometry involved show cooltubes to be inefficient,
I agree that there is a loss of light... but heat is an issue... and I would have to say I am not lacking in the light department, I think... 600 watts in 5 sq. ft.and my own tests using an Apogee Quantum meter, show the glass to bock the most light in the red and blue spectrums.
Please, do not apologize...Sorry.
Sure... but the closer to the edge of the envelope you get... the closer you are to a premature failure...All I my fans are rated for a max air temp of 140-160F. And I have yet to measure temps hotter than 120F within the duct at the intake of the fan.
Ok... what can I say...?Therefore heat moving through the fan should be no issue to it's performance.
I am not now, but plan on... and I do have way overkill light and ventilation for the tent because of that...This of course assumes you aren't daisy chaining multiple 1000w bulbs from one intake and you use appropriate cfm's moving through.
Sure, and if you blow hot air over it...We aren't running our motors hot. On all my fans, the motor is centraly located and gets air moving over it constantly.
I even said I could be wrong... I did not mean to insult anyone...my sincere apologies...Furthermore, if you reseached that guys posts, you wouldn't be accusing Picaso of ignorance.
Hot air is less dense than cold air...And lastly, all fans I own are designed to push or pull air. However, the turbine impellers work best pulling.
Hey dude, I am not a troll.. I am not here to stir anything up...I have tested this myself but you don't have to believe me.
It all depends on your growspace...
I mount my fans where they run cool not hot... so if inside of the cab is directly above the light, I would put it outside...
and....
I would stay away from the combo cooltube/exhaust fan....
Keep the cooltube on it's own... with a dedicated fan and no exchange of air with the tent....
You do not want the cooltube fan to go off when your exhaust goes off...
Keep the fans separate and hook up your exhaust fan to a thermostat....
Here is a very good drawing by Al B. Fuct...