wannabefarmer
Member
So then it would seem to me that it would only make sense to trim leaves and see how a plant responds to manipulate how buds and colas will actually grow.
I'd love to see pics of this. I am not really sure if you are talking about a scrog method or what. Also what size area and how many plants because according to my math you said about 10 of the 50 buds you had were roughly and oz. to half an oz. and the rest an 1/8 to a quarter. If you take the average of those numbers you end up with roughly 17 oz.s which in my mind would mean alot of small plants for a scrog method so just wondering what size area your using because if your able to get that kind of results out of flouros thats amazing. Anyway just curious about size of room and how many plants.It takes about 10 days to go through a bud growth cycle. From the point of new growth to showing pistils to browning out and wilting a bit.
It takes 3 or 4 cycles before I consider a bud thick enough to be of value. That means showing growth potential. Before that, they are just a couple of hits apiece. After that, they can get huge as compound growth kicks in.
This is happening constantly, all over the buds. So a single bud has multiple flower clusters going through this process, on different schedules.
As this happens, exposure to the previously generated trichones with UVB is converting some of the precursors to THC. This takes some time. I want as much of the bud exposed to as much as the UVB as possible. I have 6 UVB lights. 2 long tubes, 4 CF, spread throughout the top.
Sooner or later, a bud (or groups of buds) are available for harvest, depending on trichone color. I'm snipping and water curing, so I don't worry about flushing or taste.
I had a very dense canopy, lots of large buds, maybe 50 or so. Within those 50, maybe 10 of them qualify as colas, 1/2 to 1 oz apiece, and the rest are serious buds, between an 1/8 and a 1/4 oz. That's not wet weight, that's dry.
So imagine that number of buds packed under a 400 watt light. I pull them through the top level like threading a needle and then pull them a bit to go as close to the light as possible. Sometimes I wire them in place.
All "top" buds (direct light exposure) get turned sideways to maximize the light. This triggers side growth that you don't normally get. But it means there is a "dark" side of the bud.
These buds drop fan leaves at the top, over the other buds.
They simply go. I have no wasted light, and no single bud is allowed to monopolize the light.
Thats the top level. The next level down are shit. So little light got through that they may be barely a gram. A week of maturing will simply harden them off before cutting, no real growth potential.
Unless I clear out some of the upper leaves, there is nothing on the bottom. I usually fold them 1st. I let the plant reuse the nutrients in them. Then I chop them. But if I can't bend, I still chop.
I also bend "open" any tight colas. Colas grow toward the light, so they will bend on themselves (based on how I arrange it). So I unbend and wire them "open" to get more light to the individual internal bud areas not normally exposed.
Also, I have a "tunnel" space in the middle. 3 plants on each side. I dropped in 2 x 65 watt CFL lights, slightly under the canopy, that shine on the underside of the buds that I turned, allowing light on both sides (not the norm). Plus they are good for the smaller side buds.
Also, I have 2 x 2' T5s that I just put in as side lighting as well to plump up the buds that are not getting enough top light. The problem with FL lights is you have to have the plant within an inch or 2 to have any noticeable effect.
This is my 2nd grow. I learned a lot. I was way too paranoid during the 1st grow to experiment. Was too scared about harming the plants.
This time around, I made the decision that no matter what I cut, I have SO may buds that even if I stunt an occasional bud, the key issue is gettin the UVB on top buds, so behave accordingly. No matter how much "damage" I may do, I still have enough and the knowledge gained will be worth it.
I was right. At this point I could not envision getting more (quantity) out of this space, and the quality is great.
Yay me (and all the people I've been reading this last year in these forums).
How much area do you have with that lighting ?Whoever said that because the buds are green they are photosynthesizing was right on the money.
I do 2-3 rounds of lateral shoot and leaf removal, and a final leaf removal about 10 days before harvest when I grow a purple strain. I usually veg my plants for about 6 weeks. The first cleanup of bottom stuff occurs at about week 3. I follow up with another cleanup at about week 5, and I do a final 'manicure' and remove all the farf at about day 20 of 12/12 to avoid affecting the transition period. I like to gauge the severity of shoot/leaf removal by how much light is reaching the floor. If NO light is reaching the floor than the canopy is much too dense. If direct beams of light are hitting the floor, I will pinch and bend a few stems in order to intercept more light. I find these steps to be a necessity because of my growing style. I have 24 3 gallon pots under 2 x 1000w lights, and the canopy ends up filling completely in very early in the grow. I have left all the crap down below in the past like people are suggesting, and it produces crappy, farfy buds that are barely fit for the hash pile. Comparing a high density indoor grow to "what nature intended" is a pointless argument. Our controlled indoor environments are nothing like the outdoor setting where MJ evolved, so our practices will not be the same as they are for outdoor plants.
Now even if this seems as a good argument I would strongly disagree here. The idea of growing indoors is to re-create nature! Lights imitate the sun, water imitates the rain, fans the wind. We even change specters to simulate season change for god's sake .. We try so hard to imitate nature in all sorts of ways. Now what does trimming simulate? An occasional critter braking off some leafs? I don't think so..I agree that the argument of "you should do it how god intended" is pointless when referring to an indoor grow.. I mean god doesn't pull males to produce seedless bud does he?? like it or not.. it's a fact that we're actively diverting from nature when we go indoors anyway.. crop manipulation is just as much a part of growing indoors as HPS light... IMO
What idea of growing indoors? The basic concept of growing indoors (or outdoors) is the process by which you cause a marijuana plant to produce the greatest amount of weight in active constituents from the lowest amount of invested energy. There are many ways in which this can be achieved, the argument is which are better; but none of them are "natural." Plants come from nature, but the purpose we are applying to them DOES NOT, whether growing outdoors or indoors. Marijuana doesn't grow itself to produce large quantities of chemicals that are psychoactive in humans. Natural weed is full of thick stems and seeds, and is very low in resin. It sucks, straight up. When we apply an unnatural process (intention-directed breeding), we get the wonderful crystalline beauty of marijuana. Frankly, the idea of growing indoors/outdoors is to alter nature in an unnatural way to produce a fundamentally different result than what would ever occur in nature, not to re-create nature. We definitely learn a lot from watching the plant in its natural environment, the basics of what it needs to grow, the nature of advanced processes it has developed towards its directive (growth, reproduction, general sustainability), and we can look closer to also see the environments which encourage traits that are useful to our unnatural directive. We then use this knowledge to produce an environment with an unnatural purpose (psychoactive compound concentration/quantity), and thus the environment itself is fundamentally unnatural. This is all based on conjecture of what natural even is, though... Technically everything humans do is quite natural, thus all environments we create are also natural. The marijuana plant's amazing ability to adapt to any environment is what is most important, not the "natural" or "unnatural" nature of that environment.Now even if this seems as a good argument I would strongly disagree here. The idea of growing indoors is to re-create nature! Lights imitate the sun, water imitates the rain, fans the wind. We even change specters to simulate season change for god's sake .. We try so hard to imitate nature in all sorts of ways. Now what does trimming simulate? An occasional critter braking off some leafs? I don't think so..
Original growing conditions? What does that mean? The growing conditions of the breeding rooms? It'd be pretty hard to know the conditions of the breeding rooms for every strain that was bred into any particular strain, therefore impossible to know the best conditions without experimentation. The best conditions are rarely very "natural" for strains which have gone through extensive breeding; they've adapted to do well under the unnatural conditions humans have subjected them to in order to get large quantities of the most potent buds. You could find a naturally growing strain in the jungle somewhere and try to replicate its environment exactly... I doubt you'll get much out of it, aside from a really tough & really pretty house plant.you must recreate nature in its entirety to each strains original growing conditions to really get A+ medicinal quality dope.