and you didnt pursue a single one of those footnotes.
they all came from secondary sources like newspaper op-eds, tertiary sources like tv news broadcasts repeating newspaper op-eds, and feculent sources like the huffington post.
the best way to demonstrate that ron paul is a racist is to offer up actual quotes from ron paul, which are racist.
but that would be too much like real work.
it's so much easier to simply repeat calumny from shabby sources.
there are some
actual quotes from rawn pawl in the houston chronicle, may 23rd 1996, section A, page 29. this was cited in a footnote in the wikipedia article.
if you want something better than those printed, actual quotes from 1996, i can show you rawn pawl himself owning up to that defense in 2011.
in a post debate interview with hannity, he referred to an article written in the texas monthly in 2011.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2824529/posts
here is that interview he did with texas monthly:
http://www.texasmonthly.com/content/dr-no
he talks about what happened when he owned up to those newsletters in 1996. he says he lied then. but now, he has a new lie and says he never knew about them. but that contradicts his earlier lie(s).
i can also show you the interviews his aides have done, all of whom say that rawn pawl either wrote or approved each of those newsletters personally.
whether he actually wrote them or not, he KNOWINGLY made millions off of said stoking of racial tensions.
go ahead and ask me to post the youtube post debate interview he did with hannity. i can find it.