BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
it shows an image to me, going through chuck.....Elon doesn't like to show some tweets on other platforms and most have to do with Ukraine, so here is an image.
View attachment 5326491
it shows an image to me, going through chuck.....Elon doesn't like to show some tweets on other platforms and most have to do with Ukraine, so here is an image.
View attachment 5326491
Twitter is a can of worms, Elon fucked it up completely and the Russian trolls take over the threads in waves, are beaten back and then appear again. I have noticed he is fucking with Ukraine though and they have complained a lot about their views on twitter and getting banned by Russians over nothing. Considering twitter is banned in Russia there seem to be a lot of supporters and mostly bots on it and if the platform is banned in Russia why is Elon fucking with the algorithm to their advantage? Then again why did he intervene to their advantage with starlink?it shows an image to me, going through chuck.....
i've noticed that on twitter myself, Ukr stuff is quiet limited in seeing and that problably cause of Elon and the crap he's doing. I have noticed on Anton's stuff he's asked what we have seen, and he's got a little list working, keep in mind Russia may have banned it, the his VPN farm is still getting through. Also i have noticed in the vids that one a UA person puts in up, later it will be switched to the russian side, but it's the same vid. So beware. If you look at the trending area you'll notice #Russiaislosing <--Bot fam r us there, you'll find bothTwitter is a can of worms, Elon fucked it up completely and the Russian trolls take over the threads in waves, are beaten back and then appear again. I have noticed he is fucking with Ukraine though and they have complained a lot about their views on twitter and getting banned by Russians over nothing. Considering twitter is banned in Russia there seem to be a lot of supporters and mostly bots on it and if the platform is banned in Russia why is Elon fucking with the algorithm to their advantage? Then again why did he intervene to their advantage with starlink?
They aren't that accurate, but don't need to be since they leave a really big hole in the ground, destroy the planes carrying them is the best bet, or a forward deployed starstreak missile might take them out.
He is in jail now and Russian media has tightened up quite a bit since Russia started losing the war, which it was, right from the beginning. Sun Tuz said the battle is won or lost before the fighting even begins and that is the case here.now i know why Russia wants to get rid of you Girkin......
The Ukrainians should spoof a massive attack and see if Elon shuts it down again, bring boats close to the target and have them turn around and go back autonomously using a separate GPS system to an assembly point if they lose the starlink system. For that matter make it a real attack and see what happens, the drones will return to where they can be towed back for reuse, if Elon exposes himself again.During Ukraine’s attack on Sevastopol, Starlink “crashed” again
Despite the fact that the Pentagon ordered “special” terminals for Ukraine, Starlink suffered a massive failure during the attack on Russian ships by surface drones
On the night of September 13, around 3 am, Starlink satellite internet service experienced a large-scale failure. According to monitoring services, it started around 02:30 and lasted until 04:30.
This is evidenced by DownDetector and NetBlocks, which reported such a global problem observed by Starlink subscribers around the world.
This failure was timed to coincide with Ukraine’s attack on Russian ships in the Black Sea and the bay of occupied Sevastopol. At the same time, while the cruise missile strike hit the Rostov-on-Don submarine, along with the large landing ship Minsk in dry dock, there was a simultaneous attack by surface drones on Russian ships, as declared by the Russian Federation. Three drones were involved, but they were destroyed and the attack was unsuccessful.
And according to the Russian Ministry of Defense, the attack took place around 3 a.m. That is, it coincided with a breakdown in Starlink’s operations.
It should be noted that last year, as it became known thanks to the biography of Elon Musk by Walter Isaacson, Elon Musk had already decided to at least not turn on, according to other information, to specifically turn off Starlink near the occupied Crimea during the attack of Ukrainian surface drones on Russian ships. The reasoning behind this decision was the alleged reluctance to draw the United States into the war.
At the same time, according to a number of reputable Western media outlets, in June of this year, the Pentagon purchased Starlink terminals for Ukraine with the ability to customize signals in order to “realize its goals.” We were talking about 400-500 such terminals.
And while it may be unfair and unreasonable to suspect Elon Musk of preventing another Ukrainian attack on Russian warships that are shelling cities, the coincidence is rather strange. Although turning off the entire Starlink network for this purpose may look like a rather open step.
This is especially true when the US Congress is already calling for an investigation into Elon Musk’s activities, as US foreign policy should be decided by the government, not an individual billionaire. Moreover, the Pentagon has been considering and testing Starlink as one of the global communication systems for its military since at least 2020.
During Ukraine's attack on Sevastopol, Starlink "crashed" again - latest news ➡️ The latest on technology and society SUNDRIES in English
Read more about During Ukraine's attack on Sevastopol, Starlink "crashed" again ✅ top world news in English ✅ latest news ✅ Follow the linksundries.com.ua
I noticed the video of the drone boat I posted looked like it had multiple phased array satellite antennas on it, pointing in various directions including fore and aft, angled on the side too. They might be using cube sat or another system that doesn't have the coverage of starlink, so for this they would need more antennas though.During Ukraine’s attack on Sevastopol, Starlink “crashed” again
Despite the fact that the Pentagon ordered “special” terminals for Ukraine, Starlink suffered a massive failure during the attack on Russian ships by surface drones
On the night of September 13, around 3 am, Starlink satellite internet service experienced a large-scale failure. According to monitoring services, it started around 02:30 and lasted until 04:30.
This is evidenced by DownDetector and NetBlocks, which reported such a global problem observed by Starlink subscribers around the world.
This failure was timed to coincide with Ukraine’s attack on Russian ships in the Black Sea and the bay of occupied Sevastopol. At the same time, while the cruise missile strike hit the Rostov-on-Don submarine, along with the large landing ship Minsk in dry dock, there was a simultaneous attack by surface drones on Russian ships, as declared by the Russian Federation. Three drones were involved, but they were destroyed and the attack was unsuccessful.
And according to the Russian Ministry of Defense, the attack took place around 3 a.m. That is, it coincided with a breakdown in Starlink’s operations.
It should be noted that last year, as it became known thanks to the biography of Elon Musk by Walter Isaacson, Elon Musk had already decided to at least not turn on, according to other information, to specifically turn off Starlink near the occupied Crimea during the attack of Ukrainian surface drones on Russian ships. The reasoning behind this decision was the alleged reluctance to draw the United States into the war.
At the same time, according to a number of reputable Western media outlets, in June of this year, the Pentagon purchased Starlink terminals for Ukraine with the ability to customize signals in order to “realize its goals.” We were talking about 400-500 such terminals.
And while it may be unfair and unreasonable to suspect Elon Musk of preventing another Ukrainian attack on Russian warships that are shelling cities, the coincidence is rather strange. Although turning off the entire Starlink network for this purpose may look like a rather open step.
This is especially true when the US Congress is already calling for an investigation into Elon Musk’s activities, as US foreign policy should be decided by the government, not an individual billionaire. Moreover, the Pentagon has been considering and testing Starlink as one of the global communication systems for its military since at least 2020.
During Ukraine's attack on Sevastopol, Starlink "crashed" again - latest news ➡️ The latest on technology and society SUNDRIES in English
Read more about During Ukraine's attack on Sevastopol, Starlink "crashed" again ✅ top world news in English ✅ latest news ✅ Follow the linksundries.com.ua
That is a tied record for the most artillery. Fifty next, anyone?Big jump in artillery systems today, looks like Ukraine might have relocated their guns forward for fresh targets further to the Russian rear. Or maybe they are putting the most recent shipment of HIMARS rockets to good use.
Counterbattery radars coupled with highly accurate 155mm rounds that have better range I figure drones correct the fire until they are dead or make sure. The Ukrainians should be experts at using it and probably developed lots of tactics and traps to suck the Russian's into firing their inaccurate guns and before they can correct fire...That is a tied record for the most artillery. Fifty next, anyone?