cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
“Society is slavery” in three! … two! …“Gold Standard”
Here We Go!
“Society is slavery” in three! … two! …“Gold Standard”
Here We Go!
Naw, we got jails, prisoners, and less regulated countries to be and host our slaves. Americans still thrive off slavery all over the world, including here at home.“Society is slavery” in three! … two! …
That doesn't somehow make him a progressive peace and freedom advocate. He was a war mongering bigoted fascist president.GW is scorned by today’s radical fascist Repugs.
Progressive is to the right of Peace and Freedom.That doesn't somehow make him a progressive peace and freedom advocate. He was a war mongering bigoted fascist president.
I wasn't referring to the peace and freedom party or "progressive" as a political group, I was referring to a progressive, peace and freedom state of mind.Progressive is to the right of Peace and Freedom.
Progressive is used to describe social democrats, who want a regulated market economy featuring private corporate ownership.
Peace and Freedom Party seeks the Marxist implementation of the collectivization of the means of production, including finance.
You posted a contradiction.
That is a contortion that does not justify your considered misuse of the terminology.I wasn't referring to the peace and freedom party or "progressive" as a political group, I was referring to a progressive, peace and freedom state of mind.
It's not a contortion. This is a legitimate definition of progressive:That is a contortion that does not justify your considered misuse of the terminology.
no link. Why am I not surprised?It's not a contortion. This is a legitimate definition of progressive:
a person advocating or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas
Your attempt to contort my statement is feeble at best, and I'd expect more from you. It's also a straw man argument, and your attempt to discredit my statement that Bush was neither progressive, or a supporter of peace and freedom, is frankly laughable.
Bro, you use straw man arguments multiple times a day, I just don't call you on it every time. I find it ridiculously hilarious that you constantly accuse others of something which you regularly practice yourself.no link. Why am I not surprised?
You do not know the definition of a straw man.
Or, more likely, you do, and are using it mendaciously.
Straw man: A straw man is a form of argument and an informal fallacy of having the impression of refuting an argument, whereas the real subject of the argument was not addressed or refuted, but instead replaced with a false one.You do not know the definition of a straw man.
No; you accuse me of using them without ever once proving it.Bro, you use straw man arguments multiple times a day, I just don't call you on it every time. I find it ridiculously hilarious that you constantly accuse others of something which you regularly practice yourself.
As far as a link, I just used Google, but here's your link (note the first definition as a noun):
define progressive - Google Search
www.google.com
You simply cannot stop lying.Straw man: A straw man is a form of argument and an informal fallacy of having the impression of refuting an argument, whereas the real subject of the argument was not addressed or refuted, but instead replaced with a false one.
Your argument here is classic straw man, as you never addressed or refuted the argument that Bush "was a war mongering bigoted fascist president". As reminder, here's what your argument to that is:
View attachment 5193740
I just proved it dude. You are too scared to debate. I guess you must think that Bush was a great president. It says a lot about you.No; you accuse me of using them without ever once proving it.
You are one of the most dishonest posters on this forum. Anyone wishing to fill a piñata with fallacies and falsehoods will be well-served by the posts in this thread alone.
View attachment 5193741
The brown triangles represent a thick and creamy center of fallacy surrounded by a delicate yet crispy feuilleté of just plain lies.
View attachment 5193743
No, actually.I just proved it dude. You are too scared to debate. I guess you must think that Bush was a great president. It says a lot about you.
Then feel free to to prove me wrong, since I noticed that you also didn't include any links for your self-made definitions.Nice try. I worked with the actual definitions.