what do you think of advanced nutrients?

have you used advanced nutrients?

  • Total voters
    28
  • Poll closed .
WHODAT@THADOR said:
Maybe it's @Finshaggy in disguisebongsmilie
Click to expand...
beatdown.gif
 
BROBIE said:
The Obama thing was e-sarcasm

They (lithium batteries)defeat the purpose. At least here in Merica. Fact: Batteries create more carbon waste manufacturing via coal burning electricity then just burning gallons from a regular car.
You have a taxi firm?

View attachment 3265582

It was the same greenies who protested Nuke power, now they want it
Click to expand...

Fact: there are other power sources other than coal. How are you incapable of understanding this concept? your argument is utterly worthless.
 
You know maybe the best way to try and beat me is with words. instead of stupid piks. I can't answer and post properly with all this shit going off. I did find the post where I said COAL so please ok. you are fyunny funny with the piks. Yes you have a mouse and an internet connection.
 
tip top toker said:
Fact: there are other power sources other than coal. How are you incapable of understanding this concept? your argument is utterly worthless.
Click to expand...
Well buddy look up what percentage of the grid runs off coal. at this time. And the fact that I said "in merica at least " showed no deception.

It is going down but wind and batteries is not where it's at

For the twelve months ending in March 2013, United States' coal plants produced 1,517,203 gigawatt hours of electricity, or 37.4 percent of total U.S. electricity production.[1] At the peak year of coal's contribution to U.S. power production, 1988, coal produced 57.0% of U.S. power. [2][3] Coal's share in power production has fallen due to major increases in production from natural gas and smaller increases from nuclear and wind.

GAS also is a better alternative but the frack haters are on the go.

DEISEL is where its at. My car burns cleaner than a reg petro car!! clean deisel coupled with hemp sourced bio diesel

shut the fuk up
 
BROBIE said:
You know maybe the best way to try and beat me is with words. instead of stupid piks. I can't answer and post properly with all this shit going off. I did find the post where I said COAL so please ok. you are fyunny funny with the piks. Yes you have a mouse and an internet connection.
Click to expand...
team%20beatdown.gif
 
BROBIE said:
Well buddy look up what percentage of the grid runs off coal. at this time. And the fact that I said "in merica at least " showed no deception.

It is going down but wind and batteries is not where it's at

For the twelve months ending in March 2013, United States' coal plants produced 1,517,203 gigawatt hours of electricity, or 37.4 percent of total U.S. electricity production.[1] At the peak year of coal's contribution to U.S. power production, 1988, coal produced 57.0% of U.S. power. [2][3] Coal's share in power production has fallen due to major increases in production from natural gas and smaller increases from nuclear and wind.
Click to expand...

A year and a half ago, and even then only 37 percent of production? Ok :lol: thankyou for validating my point. You have yet again gone out of your way to highlight your stupidity.

So how does the carbon footprint of batteries work out for the other 63 percent of power created in the USA, the stuff that is not coal driven, the stuff you refuse to accept because it would defy your entire argument..
 
BROBIE said:
Well buddy look up what percentage of the grid runs off coal. at this time. And the fact that I said "in merica at least " showed no deception.

It is going down but wind and batteries is not where it's at

For the twelve months ending in March 2013, United States' coal plants produced 1,517,203 gigawatt hours of electricity, or 37.4 percent of total U.S. electricity production.[1] At the peak year of coal's contribution to U.S. power production, 1988, coal produced 57.0% of U.S. power. [2][3] Coal's share in power production has fallen due to major increases in production from natural gas and smaller increases from nuclear and wind.

GAS also is a better alternative but the frack haters are on the go.

DEISEL is where its at. My car burns cleaner than a reg petro car!! clean deisel coupled with hemp sourced bio diesel

shut the fuk up
Click to expand...
is that a cut and paste from wiki?
 
The Yorkshireman said:
No you fucking didn't (3 times now).
Click to expand...


BROBIE said:
The Obama thing was e-sarcasm

They (lithium batteries)defeat the purpose. At least here in Merica. Fact: Batteries create more carbon waste manufacturing via coal burning electricity then just burning gallons from a regular car.
You have a taxi firm?

View attachment 3265582

It was the same greenies who protested Nuke power, now they want it
Click to expand...


3 times here too you blind bat.. stop masterbating
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Lurpin
Jacks vs. Advanced vs. Remo
2 3
Replies
43
Views
3K
dwc420letsgo
dwc420letsgo
G
Biocanna - Canna v/s Advanced Nutrients
Replies
5
Views
494
greenBorg
G
G
Leaf issues and general question
Replies
6
Views
435
Delps8
D
S
Remo nuts after they opened
Replies
11
Views
660
7CardBud
7CardBud
by2
Soil test interpretation
Replies
4
Views
606
by2
by2
Back
Top