Who has the dankest of the dank?

Who has the dankest of the dank?

  • Rare Dankness

    Votes: 13 10.8%

  • Og Raskal

    Votes: 11 9.2%

  • Gage Green

    Votes: 6 5.0%

  • Bodhi

    Votes: 14 11.7%

  • Mr. Nice

    Votes: 9 7.5%

  • Sannie/E$cob@r

    Votes: 12 10.0%

  • Connoiseur Genetics

    Votes: 2 1.7%

  • DNA/Reserva Privada

    Votes: 18 15.0%

  • Cali Connections

    Votes: 10 8.3%

  • TGA Subcool

    Votes: 25 20.8%
  • Total voters
    120
imo, they all have some fire.. and nothing every one breeder puts out is going to be super top notch, they all have a few that aren't as good as the rest imo..
but some strains from any of those breeders will be top notch smoke imo..
 
Raskal & Cali connection have some off the most potent kush. Haven't tried bodhi yet ( have some head trip in the vault ) but have heard great things.
 
I voted for Sannies/e$ko, because not only has fire genetics and serious work done but also great client service and unbeatable prices. But then, it would be unfair not to tell that everybody in ur list has some really good strains to offer..
 
What is the point of asking? Anything like this is personal preference. Who are good breeders is one thing, who is the best is just daft.
 
tip top toker said:
What is the point of asking? Anything like this is personal preference. Who are good breeders is one thing, who is the best is just daft.
Click to expand...
I guess I was asking just out of curiosity to see if any breeders stood above the pack. Another reason is because I am currently absorbed in reading about seeds and strains and gathering as much info as possible. Also, these seeds are freakin' expensive, and with the time and effort that goes into growing out a strain, the more certainty that it will be fire the better.

I do realize that it is imperfect to ask because it IS personal preference and probably very few people have the contrast between all of the breeders to say who is the best. It may be pointless for some, but it is both fun and informative to me and I'm sure others and if we get enough votes then it may be revealing.
 
I say cc. The tahoe is the description of dank.

All around, sannie and co take the cake. Great genetics, great prices, great customer service.
 
Gage Green and Bodhi only getting 1 vote each? Wow does everyone purchase from McDonald breeders? Grape Stomper and Bodhi strains are almost always sold out for a reason!
 
Nightmarecreature said:
Gage Green and Bodhi only getting 1 vote each? Wow does everyone purchase from McDonald breeders? Grape Stomper and Bodhi strains are almost always sold out for a reason!
Click to expand...
I really respect the serious work of GGG and Bodhi and yes, they r top notch, no doubt, but they also provide the market with a very limited number of beans, that's the other reason they sell out so quickly.. and that makes them even more desirable ;-)
 
My first ever smoke up was with some good quality stuff grown by my uncle's friend, supposedly an OG R strain. That was still the best ever high I've had. But we'll see after I start growing my own. I've got a good variety including OG R, G13, dinafem and GHC.
 
Redeye Bri said:
I guess I was asking just out of curiosity to see if any breeders stood above the pack.
Click to expand...

Put it this way, all of the breeders you listed have at least some top notch lines, and you can get something great from any of them. Many of them are ultimately starting with the same elite bred lines or clones anyway, so there is going to be some genetic overlap. (EG, more than one of the above are starting with famous CA-kush cuts, etc).

A few of them probably don't offer anything in their entire lines that isn't at least "very good", though you may have to watch out for hermies with some of the CA-type kushes (that's just how those lines are).

The way you asked the specific question ("who's got the dankest of the dank"), to my mind is a question about who has the most potent strain.

In my opinion, focusing on that is a mistake, albeit a common one. Everyone seems to want "the most potent" strain possible, but that's really just one of many criteria you should consider, and probably nowhere near the top one.

Once you hit about 20% THC, you're got a "really potent" strain to the point where you won't need much, and I'd argue that something 22-26% isn't functionally any "better". Is 100 proof whisky really better than 80 proof? If 20% THC won't do it for you, a 25% "superstrain" probably won't either, and in either case you can make hash to increase potency if you really feel the need.

Instead, things you should think about include ceed availability and cost, flowering time, yield, flavor, medical effect, and general ease of growth. *Especially* if you're a new grower, these things are more important than absolute potency.
 
I just feel like some1 like tga has dank, I loved vortex n ace of spades, n I just cycled out cheese qua, but so many of his strains r pretty much the same genetics. Maybe 25% dif, n all his males still have that space queen in em. N let me repeat, he def has dank strains, even if personally I feel like he can be quite arrogant n contradicts himself on a pretty regular basis. That wld b like Bohdi using ONLY snow lotus or a snow lotus cross males n hittin the same few mothers. I like variety n I feel like those strains can be way too similar in some cases. I got 2 phenos of Chernobyl in bloom right now n I will def run ace of spades agn, n I wld run vortex agn but my fav pheno was a-13 dom so I just scooped up f4's from mota so I'm good there. I guess the point is I dnt feel like its necessary to run 3d or plushberry or many of his others bc w.running the 4( including the Chernobyl) I've touched 90% of his gene pool. I guess w.how his stuff is w.the genes being like so n reading dank 2.0 n his forum the past yr I cldnt consider him up there in my top 4-5, which I did after runnin a cpl of his. But obv that's just my opinion n I have rly liked the things I've ran from him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top