why are conservative women so sexy next to their counterparts?

joepro

Well-Known Member
Yeah I agree completely with you on this one Stoney. Hey conservatives, since your set of morals seems to include racism, oppression, and just plain ugly selfishness all in one package deal, I think I'll pass on the morals thing.

Instead, I think I'll continue leading a life without morals, a life spent advocating equality(in all aspects) and being compassionate towards the less fortunate. Oh wait, I think some people may consider those traits to be morals. Now I'm confused, which of us is being moral again?:dunce:
:lol: you need a history lesson on morals.
republican presidents end wars, while dem presidents start them. The dems were for slavery and against civil rights.(dem congress put cannabis on the book, while repubulicans fought against it) 67 chicago DNC?? the republicans do nothing but push moral beliefs.(most of the time, they are way to moral if anything)


photo of 192? DNC in DC.(yep, that would be 20,000 demorcatic klan members)


please put away your racism trump card, it clearly can't be used to attack republicans.
 

TheDankness

Well-Known Member
I don't see where in that I accused you of being a failure...

I remember typing Failure should not bring success

and that I wish I was a failure so the government would support me, as I've at least paid for 3 years of such support (quite possibly more.)


I don't remember saying anything about you being a failure...

I don't know if you've noticed, but those people on welfare carrying their three kids in one arm at the grocery store don't have it that well off. Are you jealous of their EBT card, because I bet they would give it up in a heartbeat, IF THEY COULD.
 

Stoney McFried

Well-Known Member
Then what was the point of the post?To say liberals are failures?Or that they support failure?
I don't see where in that I accused you of being a failure...

I remember typing Failure should not bring success

and that I wish I was a failure so the government would support me, as I've at least paid for 3 years of such support (quite possibly more.)


I don't remember saying anything about you being a failure...
 

TheDankness

Well-Known Member
:lol: you need a history lesson on morals.
republican presidents end wars, while dem presidents start them. The dems were for slavery and against civil rights.(dem congress put cannabis on the book, while repubulicans fought against it) 67 chicago DNC?? the republicans do nothing but push moral beliefs.(most of the time, they are way to moral if anything)


photo of 192? DNC in DC.(yep, that would be 20,000 demorcatic klan members)


please put away your racism trump card, it clearly can't be used to attack republicans.
Its 2009, and liberals are no longer for war or racism. Maybe you should update your information, its from the stone age.:sleep:
 

Stoney McFried

Well-Known Member
The south abandoned the democratic party.The racists defected.Most kkk members are conservative white Christian men.
:lol: you need a history lesson on morals.
republican presidents end wars, while dem presidents start them. The dems were for slavery and against civil rights.(dem congress put cannabis on the book, while repubulicans fought against it) 67 chicago DNC?? the republicans do nothing but push moral beliefs.(most of the time, they are way to moral if anything)


photo of 192? DNC in DC.(yep, that would be 20,000 demorcatic klan members)


please put away your racism trump card, it clearly can't be used to attack republicans.
 

TheDankness

Well-Known Member
The south abandoned the democratic party.The racists defected.Most kkk members are conservative white Christian men.
:clap::clap::clap::clap:

You know what else I find funny? So many liberal bashers on a forum that's designed for what is essentially a liberal dominated activity, historically speaking anyway. Without us liberals I doubt any of you conservatives would even be smoking pot.
I'm still waiting for someone to dispute this one...
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
Then what was the point of the post?To say liberals are failures?Or that they support failure?
To say that I don't see any problem with my morals, that include believing that failure should result in well... failure, instead of being rewarded, and that people should have self-responsibility.

Regardless of if it's some one that's found themselves knocked up with three kids, or a Corporate CEO whose company was ran into the ground by a lack of solid, intelligent management.

Being responsible, and not making mistakes is hard enough. Having to watch my labor get stolen from me to help others, that don't even have the courage to ask me to help them, but insist on electing politicians who promise to steal from the productve for their benefit...

The entire problem with the so called "Progressive" Liberalism is that it's ass backwards, built up on the concept of giving power to a State that is empowered to steal from others, and if the others don't give their permission, then it takes everything and locks them up.

Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
 

Stoney McFried

Well-Known Member
But how much is enough for you?Why is it that the folks who are screaming the loudest about being forced to pay more taxes are always the ones who have the most money?I don't personally believe you owe me anything.I wouldn't ask you if I needed help.It's called pride.But you should have to pay your fair share, just like everyone else.I don't think it's necessary to have four cars and a two million dollar house...but if YOU want them, fine.Just pay fair taxes on them, like everyone else should. I don't think that stepping on the poor is the way to success.And I don't define success in the same way that you might. As long as I have enough money to pay the bills and put food on the table and clothes on the kids, fine.I don't need things, because they're just things.They come and go_One day, I WILL live off the grid. I will be completely self sufficient, and, hopefully, out of the monetary system for good.
To say that I don't see any problem with my morals, that include believing that failure should result in well... failure, instead of being rewarded, and that people should have self-responsibility.

Regardless of if it's some one that's found themselves knocked up with three kids, or a Corporate CEO whose company was ran into the ground by a lack of solid, intelligent management.

Being responsible, and not making mistakes is hard enough. Having to watch my labor get stolen from me to help others, that don't even have the courage to ask me to help them, but insist on electing politicians who promise to steal from the productve for their benefit...

The entire problem with the so called "Progressive" Liberalism is that it's ass backwards, built up on the concept of giving power to a State that is empowered to steal from others, and if the others don't give their permission, then it takes everything and locks them up.

Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
 

TheDankness

Well-Known Member
Why are conservatives so arrogant they think they should decide where tax dollars go? I bet you don't consider it stolen if it goes to a cause you approve of, kind of a double standard, don't you think? We elect government officials for a reason, if you don't like it, enjoy the third world country of your choice.
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
Why are conservatives so arrogant they think they should decide where tax dollars go? I bet you don't consider it stolen if it goes to a cause you approve of, kind of a double standard, don't you think? We elect government officials for a reason, if you don't like it, enjoy the third world country of your choice.
No, it's stolen, more than my fair share (~$8K/year) is taken, thus the amount over that is stolen.

Of course, if the government was providing social services to idiots like Octomom then maybe my fair share would be considerably lower.

Government has a duty to provide services that benefit everyone, not just bureaucrats, or individuals that get to line up at the government trough.

I don't even have a guess on how much the actual services government provides that are truly used by everyone would cost.

Probably less than $1 Trillion, which reduces my fair share to $3,300/year, about 1/5th of what I paid in taxes this year.

Bite your tongue, I only make about what the average American Makes.

Maybe slightly more.

Of course, another person making the same amount that I am is likely to pay less...

Totally irrational illogical system.

The government should cut out all the loop holes and tax income at a flat rate across the board.

Though I like the concept of a FairTax or NRST better, Savings and Investment should not be punished, especially since the current crisis has been a result of too much debt.

People should not be punished for saving for their future.

I don't know why I'm bothering with even bringing up the fair tax, having to explain how it doesn't unfairly punish the poor and is progressive is beyond how much I feel like typing.
 

Twistyman

Well-Known Member
You know what else I find funny? So many liberal bashers on a forum that's designed for what is essentially a liberal dominated activity, historically speaking anyway. Without us liberals I doubt any of you conservatives would even be smoking pot.
The rights double standard.. Imagine the howls from the right if Obama's daughter was raising a baby sans father in her teens....
yet that Palin tramp can.. and its OK....
No double standards there........
 

joepro

Well-Known Member
Why are conservatives so arrogant they think they should decide where tax dollars go? I bet you don't consider it stolen if it goes to a cause you approve of, kind of a double standard, don't you think? We elect government officials for a reason, if you don't like it, enjoy the third world country of your choice.
This post is just WRONG.
I hope you cut n pasted this and this isn't your natural thought process.
 

Stoney McFried

Well-Known Member
I'd love to meet these average Americans you speak of.Average folks around here supposedly make 43k a year....but I've never met them.Most make considerably less.
No, it's stolen, more than my fair share (~$8K/year) is taken, thus the amount over that is stolen.

Of course, if the government was providing social services to idiots like Octomom then maybe my fair share would be considerably lower.

Government has a duty to provide services that benefit everyone, not just bureaucrats, or individuals that get to line up at the government trough.

I don't even have a guess on how much the actual services government provides that are truly used by everyone would cost.

Probably less than $1 Trillion, which reduces my fair share to $3,300/year, about 1/5th of what I paid in taxes this year.

Bite your tongue, I only make about what the average American Makes.

Maybe slightly more.

Of course, another person making the same amount that I am is likely to pay less...

Totally irrational illogical system.

The government should cut out all the loop holes and tax income at a flat rate across the board.

Though I like the concept of a FairTax or NRST better, Savings and Investment should not be punished, especially since the current crisis has been a result of too much debt.

People should not be punished for saving for their future.

I don't know why I'm bothering with even bringing up the fair tax, having to explain how it doesn't unfairly punish the poor and is progressive is beyond how much I feel like typing.
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
I'd love to meet these average Americans you speak of.Average folks around here supposedly make 43k a year....but I've never met them.Most make considerably less.
So I make a little bit more, big fucking whoop.

It still doesn't change the fact that I'm unfairly punished for being single, and not having dependents.
 

Stoney McFried

Well-Known Member
Weird.My old man and I aren't married,and we get some back in taxes.Married folks I know with single incomes actually seem to pay more.Must be an Iowa thing.
So I make a little bit more, big fucking whoop.

It still doesn't change the fact that I'm unfairly punished for being single, and not having dependents.
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
Weird.My old man and I aren't married,and we get some back in taxes.Married folks I know with single incomes actually seem to pay more.Must be an Iowa thing.
How much do you actually pay... you probably aren't really getting anything back.

Heck, tax returns are like a slap in the face to me. I don't care if I ever become a CEO or not, I do however want to be able to enjoy my retirement.

It'd be a lot easier to guarantee that if the government would stop trying to "help" me with my retirement.

Heck, even if just let me opt out of SS I'd be happy.

I'm willing to concede that there are is a need for taxes (I disagree with the extent), but I do believe that the government needs to cut the budget drastically and get out of debt.

Sound financial policy...

The opposite of what all the politicians since before Hoover have done...
 

joepro

Well-Known Member
You know what else I find funny? So many liberal bashers on a forum that's designed for what is essentially a liberal dominated activity, historically speaking anyway. Without us liberals I doubt any of you conservatives would even be smoking pot.
If it's so liberal, why so meny conservatives on this web site?
the way I see it, if it wasn't for a democratic congress cannabis wouldn't be outlawed; therefore this web site wouldn't really be needed as is.
...... historically speaking anyway:lol:
 

Stoney McFried

Well-Known Member
No real idea.He handles the finances,I just do the grocery shopping, babysitting and housecleaning.He's been at this particular job for 2 years, got back 4 k this year.Of course, he claims no exemptions at the beginning of the year, then when he files his taxes, he claims them all.
How much do you actually pay... you probably aren't really getting anything back.

Heck, tax returns are like a slap in the face to me. I don't care if I ever become a CEO or not, I do however want to be able to enjoy my retirement.

It'd be a lot easier to guarantee that if the government would stop trying to "help" me with my retirement.

Heck, even if just let me opt out of SS I'd be happy.

I'm willing to concede that there are is a need for taxes (I disagree with the extent), but I do believe that the government needs to cut the budget drastically and get out of debt.

Sound financial policy...

The opposite of what all the politicians since before Hoover have done...
 
Top