MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
Not at all, it's a great source of amusement. I laugh at your hypocrisy and generally stupid comments all the time. Please continue...dance for me, DANCE FOR ME!does that disturb you?
Not at all, it's a great source of amusement. I laugh at your hypocrisy and generally stupid comments all the time. Please continue...dance for me, DANCE FOR ME!does that disturb you?
Doesn't make me a liberal, it makes you are Partisan.Don't worry, some of your lib buddies will come along and "like" a bunch of your posts and tell us how what you said is totally not racist/bigoted/whatever.
No, it makes you a pathetic, partisan hypocrite. The "preference" defense was bullshit and not even the point. It was the generalization of Jews using laughable stereotypes that was bigoted. She might as well have used blacks and they all stink of fried chicken and watermelons. There's no difference unless you're an anti-Semite and think anything against Jews is fair game.Doesn't make me a liberal, it makes you are Partisan.
That's great, except you gave "family pressure" as the reason. Now say it again using some ridiculous, bigoted stereotype as the reason and tell us how it's still not bigoted.Yeah, it's your breath.
I will date a lot gals for friendly sex, but I would never marry a Jewess or a Dark Goddess or an Asian wonderwoman,, or another WASP princess from CA.
All about the family pressures. And you can call names. You are good at that.
This seems very light-hearted, to me.tightpocket? so lemme guess?..you're jewish
um, that would be donald "the jew" sterling who made such a remark during his slumlord days.No, it makes you a pathetic, partisan hypocrite. The "preference" defense was bullshit and not even the point. It was the generalization of Jews using laughable stereotypes that was bigoted. She might as well have used blacks and they all stink of fried chicken and watermelons. There's no difference unless you're an anti-Semite and think anything against Jews is fair game.
It's getting fucking dumb as fuck up in here.
leave my thread heathen.No one hears you. Try posting again.
well didn't that have a little thing to do with security and how the republicans didn't want to pay for it?Won't this just highlight the fact that he was interviewed two weeks after the attack, by the US press?
Why now? What dodge is this?
And this has nothing to do with the foul up in the first place. That foul up/cover up is what is being investigated.
so, you're not voting for her?"the uber successful ex-secretary of state?"
honey.....how fucking high are you? look at our nation. where success? just, uber.
America, America, uber alles....................
she is a fucking oligarch, and would perform fellatio on a dead Ronald Reagan, dressed as a Vestal Virgin, before she would let you use the servant's privy.
deluded!!
voting?so, you're not voting for her?