Entitlement

[desert dude]

here he is calling laws against pedophilia a type of TYRANNY.



freedom? not without diddling kiddies, according to undertheice.

Typical propaganda, Marie. You chose one incendiary portion of UTI's post, which is diametrically opposite to his overall point, and used it to smear him. RIU can ALWAYS count on you to be a lying piece of shit, and boring to boot.

Here is another part of the same post you quoted:

"the question then is "what are reasonable protections?" the simple answer, the only one folks like you are really capable of understanding, is that they are protections from the inevitable infringement on the rights of others. if i continuously run red lights, eventually i will cause death, injury or, at the very least, property damage to someone else. this would be infringing on their rights. if you decide to go and screw your neighbor's 11 year old daughter or son, then you are directly infringing on the rights of that child. children cannot consent, so you are essentially raping the child."

 

[UncleBuck]

i dunno, you got a link to your fake poll that actually comes from PPP?

or just more Scribd, Wikipedia and Pastebin links?

PPP has no info on that supposed poll.

therefore it is FAKE (and i dug all the way back to 200

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/08/in-louisiana-clinton-keeps-up-governor-falls.html

dumbass.

 

[UncleBuck]

Typical propaganda, Marie. You chose one incendiary portion of UTI's post, which is diametrically opposite to his overall point, and used it to smear him. RIU can ALWAYS count on you to be a lying piece of shit, and boring to boot.

Here is another part of the same post you quoted:

"the question then is "what are reasonable protections?" the simple answer, the only one folks like you are really capable of understanding, is that they are protections from the inevitable infringement on the rights of others. if i continuously run red lights, eventually i will cause death, injury or, at the very least, property damage to someone else. this would be infringing on their rights. if you decide to go and screw your neighbor's 11 year old daughter or son, then you are directly infringing on the rights of that child. children cannot consent, so you are essentially raping the child."

but a law against raping that child is tyranny, undertheice even said so.

 

[DonAlejandroVega]

they stopped marrying 12 year olds off when the life expectancy went past 25.

islam however...[/QUOTE]
they stopped sending me the news-letter. I refused to stone a non-virgin. she was "hit" for her sins, don't worry.... I'm not a Philistine...........

 

[DonAlejandroVega]

not any more.

they stopped marrying 12 year olds off when the life expectancy went past 25.

islam however...

no more......."if there's turf....play ball?"

 

[UncleBuck]

not any more.

they stopped marrying 12 year olds off when the life expectancy went past 25.

islam however...

don't be afraid to look up actual age of consent laws in muslim nations and realize what a bigoted lying retard you are being.

 

[abandonconflict]

marxism has failed.
it fails because it is based on faulty premises and idiotic assumptions made by 19th century coffeehouse fops who never had to work a day in their lives, so EVERYTHING was just a hobby for them.

they could stop drafting marxist polemics any time they felt it became to onerous, and they would never have to actually get up in the morning and put their shoulder to a plow.

from that life of luxury, their idiocy seems almost rational.

peasant must LOVE working from sun up to sun down, otherwise they would join us in our salons, and discuss art, literature and economic theories from those who have never known hunger or poverty!

marxists come in Four Flavours:
fuzzyheaded utopians who think their daydreams will make excellent economic policy
the desperate proles who will hurl their bodies at the barricades for a chance at something, ANYTHING which might be better than their current poverty
lazy shits who think that when marxism rules they will live a life of ease while everybody else works
and the opportunistic power hungry greedy assholes who think that when the revolution comes, they will be on top.

i know which one you are, do you?

Oh look, a racist is still insisting I'm a marxist.

 

[Dr Kynes]

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/08/in-louisiana-clinton-keeps-up-governor-falls.html

dumbass.

what do you know. you actually found the data.

it's still horseshit, but at least you were able to demonstrate it's not faked.

congratulations.

it was buried under 37 pages of "what do you think of drew brees and jesus?"

so rigorous, and aint it funny you linked to bana millbank's fucking blog, who linked to scribd who linked to NOBODY.

i had to dig for it and i missed it. that must mean it's not horseshit then right?

after all it came from a "scientific polling group" who neglected to include the data they included on other hotbutton issues like "how do you feel about duck dynasty?"

nice job proving that your side will work their asses off to hide the actual source of their claims, for no other reason than to gloat later about how it exists, as if that also proves it's worth a shit.

bask in it bucky, bask. it's still a pile of shit, and youre getting it all over you.

 

[Dr Kynes]

Oh look, a racist is still insisting I'm a marxist.

ohh look, a marxist is repeating a slogan.

that has never happened before!

 

[abandonconflict]

ohh look, a marxist is repeating a slogan.

that has never happened before!

I agree with about half of Karl Marx's ideas. You're more of a racist than I am a Marxist.

Tread carefully, I have caught you several times professing to have read literature which you clearly hadn't. I have read Marx, and I know you have not read more than a biased review.

 

[UncleBuck]

what do you know. you actually found the data.

it's still horseshit, but at least you were able to demonstrate it's not faked.

congratulations.

it was buried under 37 pages of "what do you think of drew brees and jesus?"

so rigorous, and aint it funny you linked to bana millbank's fucking blog, who linked to scribd who linked to NOBODY.

i had to dig for it and i missed it. that must mean it's not horseshit then right?

after all it came from a "scientific polling group" who neglected to include the data they included on other hotbutton issues like "how do you feel about duck dynasty?"

nice job proving that your side will work their asses off to hide the actual source of their claims, for no other reason than to gloat later about how it exists, as if that also proves it's worth a shit.

bask in it bucky, bask. it's still a pile of shit, and youre getting it all over you.

it's funny that you have to blame your own stupidity of "leftist fraud" when it took me all of two seconds to find the poll.

you have been so incredibly wrong in so many dramatically stark ways lately that i'm beginning to think you have had a stroke recently.

just give up you fucking stooge.

 

[Dr Kynes]

don't be afraid to look up actual age of consent laws in muslim nations and realize what a bigoted lying retard you are being.

http://www.girlsnotbrides.org/where-does-it-happen/
http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/341/facts.html
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/girls-treated-cattle-child-brides-divide-pakistan-n65956
direct from what obviously must be "Right Wing Think Tanks"

laws which are unenforced are meaningless.
yemen's "age of consent" is a mighty 15, and yet...
https://tavaana.org/en/content/age-10-and-divorced-nujood-ali-and-fight-against-child-brides-yemen

married at 9, ran away and petitioned for a divorce at 10...

yeah bucky tell me more about how islam has such strict laws regarding child brides.

 

[UncleBuck]

http://www.girlsnotbrides.org/where-does-it-happen/
http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/341/facts.html
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/girls-treated-cattle-child-brides-divide-pakistan-n65956
direct from what obviously must be "Right Wing Think Tanks"

laws which are unenforced are meaningless.
yemen's "age of consent" is a mighty 15, and yet...
https://tavaana.org/en/content/age-10-and-divorced-nujood-ali-and-fight-against-child-brides-yemen

married at 9, ran away and petitioned for a divorce at 10...

yeah bucky tell me more about how islam has such strict laws regarding child brides.

mexico's age of consent is lower than any muslim nation, but you don;t pick on them for their religion.

you only pick on them because you are too much of an incompetent brokedick to pick fruit.

 

[Dr Kynes]

I agree with about half of Karl Marx's ideas. You're more of a racist than I am a Marxist.

Tread carefully, I have caught you several times professing to have read literature which you clearly hadn't. I have read Marx, and I know you have not read more than a biased review.

your retarded interpretations of various works notwithstanding, you have no clue what marxism is about, since you have NOT read the communist manifesto (or failed to grasp it's meaning) you have NOT read mao's little red book of quotations from the chairman (or failed to understand it's meaning despite being written for ignorant peasants).

if you did you wouldnt have tried so hard to argue that socialism wasnt the authoritarian middle stage between revolution and utopia.

 

[abandonconflict]

kynes once called me a marxist and a socialist because i stated that i believe in private ownership of the means of production, the main tenet of capitalism.

This site would be boring without our jester.

 

[Dr Kynes]

mexico's age of consent is lower than any muslim nation, but you don;t pick on them for their religion.

you only pick on them because you are too much of an incompetent brokedick to pick fruit.

and it's subject change time!!

mexico has a low age of consent, and thats fine for mexico, but its not 9, theres no tales of 9 year olds marrying middle aged men, mexicans dont drown their daughter for getting a job, mexicans dont stone women for being raped if they cant find enough male witnesses to support their charges, mexico doesnt hang homosecxuals by the neck in public spectacles, and i dont "pick on mexicans"

i happen to like mexicans, i just oppose illegal immigration.

such subtle distinctions are beyond your simple brain's capacity though.

 

[UncleBuck]

and it's subject change time!!

mexico has a low age of consent, and thats fine for mexico, but its not 9, theres no tales of 9 year olds marrying middle aged men, mexicans dont drown their daughter for getting a job, mexicans dont stone women for being raped if they cant find enough male witnesses to support their charges, mexico doesnt hang homosecxuals by the neck in public spectacles, and i dont "pick on mexicans"

i happen to like mexicans, i just oppose illegal immigration.

such subtle distinctions are beyond your simple brain's capacity though.

you have no shortage of stereotypes and slurs about mexicans.

japan's age of consent is lower than any muslim nation, but you don't pick on them at all (because the jobs they take are WAY above your level, generally).

saudi arabia refuses to annul marriages between 8 or 9 year olds, or anyone below 14 for that matter. the age of consent is 13 in japan.

but for some reason it's the muslims that are the problem with your bigoted ass, like usual.

go away you useless retarded bigot.

 

[abandonconflict]

another rant about marxism nobody will ever read

No, you have been trying to redefine the word socialism for this entire thread. You're the idiot who thinks fascism is a form of socialism, despite the privatization that is the core tenet of fascist regimes.

 

[UncleBuck]

No, you have been trying to redefine the word socialism for this entire thread. You're the idiot who thinks fascism is a form of socialism, despite the privatization that is the core tenet of fascist regimes.

he thinks that supporting the current minimum wage makes someone a marxist.

the dude is an idiot.

 

[Dr Kynes]

it's funny that you have to blame your own stupidity of "leftist fraud" when it took me all of two seconds to find the poll.

you have been so incredibly wrong in so many dramatically stark ways lately that i'm beginning to think you have had a stroke recently.

just give up you fucking stooge.

so now you argue that you DID verify it was not faked before you posted your bullshit link to a bullshit blog that linked to a bullshit scribd post...

admit it, you didnt even check, you just heard something you thought was suitable for your narrative and ran with it.

you probably didnt even look a millbank's "citation" to scribd, you just assumed he was right and went balls out.

if you DID check it out, why didnt you link to the actual "poll" instead of millbank's blog, who in turn didnt link to the poll?

cuz you are intellectually lazy.

i didnt find it, despite searching, you didnt even bother to check on it.