I agree some CEO compensation is absolutely atrocious, but as a business owner I definitely feel my compensation = my input and risk involved in running my company, not to mention the fact my employees are fairly compensated and I rarely have turnover. Not every business owner is a slave driver.
It's all relative.
Logic doesn't work well here with the ideology crowd. In their minds the CEO should make about $500,000 a year and the remaining $76.5 miliion should be equally distributed amongst all employees because, let's face it, just like chesusrice was personally responsible for making his former employer literally millions of dollars over the course of 2 years, every Oracle employee is personally responsible for every drop of profit. I seriously doubt many Oracle employees are complaining about making over $110k/year.
Averages aren't medians.
My employers pay very well.
Larry actually made $153 million last year at Oracle. If Larry generates so much value for the company, why do you think the majority of shares not owned by Ellison have voted against his pay package for the last few years?
impossible..my benefits package at kushy fortune 500 was worth $40k and you were reminded of it each year.
With over 122,000 employees, I highly doubt The CEO's $77mil skewed the employees average income by much, irregardless, his compensation is peanuts in relation to the company's total payroll.
He made $77mil in salary from Oracle in 2013, what he made in stocks and other investments is irrelevant to this discussion.
I have no idea how you post was relevant to my quote, come again.
haven't you ever heard of a profit share?
I don't know why I even bother you slimy little fuck. We've BEENTHERE before. Last year, Ellison made almost $153 million, making him one of the highest paid executives in the U.S.
Didn't we have this discussion the other day? Trust me, if you were that valuable, no Hmong would now be doing your OLD job and your OLD employer would have been making sure he gave you enough incentive to move with the company.
Obviously, Oracle isn't a profit-sharing company. And Oracle employyes are more than welcome to "get smart and walk" if they find better opportunities. And once again, another "employee" who bears none of the costs associated with a business, thinks she is entitled to 100% of her "revenue contribution. Unbelieveble.haven't you ever heard of a profit share?
my average revenue per client: $3k
my average clients per year: 150
my career with them: 10 years
so that would make my revenue contribution of $450k/year = $4,500,000M
and mr. business man..we do EXPECT it or we get smart and walk..like me
I guess that means you don't know either.
...then does work make you free?
