peter north pole, circa 1985.
Must be man-made shifting of magnetic north, the planet stays exactly the same without human activity, 97% of us agree.
You sure cos science?Global warming has no effect upon the earth's rotational axis.
No, I'm not sure. I think I recall reading that very conclusion in a NASA article but I can't find it.You sure cos science?
How about turning that question around?No, I'm not sure. I think I recall reading that very conclusion in a NASA article but I can't find it.
I would love a citation if you are claiming that global warming does in fact have an effect upon the rotational axis.
Nope, it's got more to do with the fact you think our rotational axis and magnetic north are the same.No, I'm not sure. I think I recall reading that very conclusion in a NASA article but I can't find it.
I would love a citation if you are claiming that global warming does in fact have an effect upon the rotational axis.
Can you prove I don't own an invisible fire breathing dragon?How about turning that question around?
Can you prove the shifting magnetic fields have no effect on the melt rate of Arctic "multi-year" ice?
Care to ever answer a question directly with something other than "But...Science!!!" ???Can you prove I don't own an invisible fire breathing dragon?
Care to actually learn the science instead of internetting your way to 'science-citizen'?Care to ever answer a question directly with something other than "But...Science!!!" ???
I can, I happen to know your parents wouldn't allow it.Can you prove I don't own an invisible fire breathing dragon?
The correct answer is no, you can't, because you can't prove a negativeI can, I happen to know your parents wouldn't allow it.
You Can Prove a NegativeThe correct answer is no, you can't, because you can't prove a negative
Now that is a very specific claim and we're going to have to tussle with the burden of proof but I will admit I made the first claim. I would settle for any peer reviewed scientific research article which draws a conclusion one way or the other on it. So let's cooperate and share anything either of us finds which meets the standard.How about turning that question around?
Can you prove the shifting magnetic fields have no effect on the melt rate of Arctic "multi-year" ice?
No, I don't.Nope, it's got more to do with the fact you think our rotational axis and magnetic north are the same.
He has a point and it is worthy of a thread. There seems to be a dearth of research on it. You should start the thread. Follow the research where ever it goes.Can you prove I don't own an invisible fire breathing dragon?