the tendency to think evolution stopped from the neck down

Status
Not open for further replies.

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Again sir, if ginwilly had posted something factually disparaging about any African nation, you would use it forever against him, branding him a white supremacist, trying to get him banned, hating on him forever.

You're as big a racist as any you've ever accused here.
everyone is racist; even bucky.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
i don't think he's murdoch bucky..@murdoch was @ironeyes and he hasn't been here for a bit sunni keeps banning him.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I've familiarized myself with you sir. But obsession? No sir. I have a demanding full-time job. So I couldn't possibly have the time to be obsessed with you.

But I've got a good idea just how extreme you are.
scenario 1: you've spent hours digging through and reading years of my posts.

diagnosis: obsession

scenario 2: you're on your 8th sock puppet account that we know of (wileycoyote, alabamaredneck, auburn1985, hm murdoch, therifleman, tbonejack, and others).

diagnosis: obsession

you are obsessed with me no matter which version of your pathetic excuses we go with.
 

TBoneJack

Well-Known Member
scenario 1: you've spent hours digging through and reading years of my posts.

diagnosis: obsession

scenario 2: you're on your 8th sock puppet account that we know of (wileycoyote, alabamaredneck, auburn1985, hm murdoch, therifleman, tbonejack, and others).

diagnosis: obsession

you are obsessed with me no matter which version of your pathetic excuses we go with.
The search feature is very powerful when used to its full potential...and it's easy to use it to its full potential...
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The search feature is very powerful when used to its full potential...and it's easy to use it to its full potential...
so even though you are totally not obsessed with me, you decided to spend a whole bunch of time going through the search feature to look up years worth of my posts?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
@ginwilly , what are your thoughts on all of this?

were you aware your theory is widely shared by white supremacists, or did you come to the same conclusion as white supremacists independently?
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
scenario 1: you've spent hours digging through and reading years of my posts.

diagnosis: obsession

scenario 2: you're on your 8th sock puppet account that we know of (wileycoyote, alabamaredneck, auburn1985, hm murdoch, therifleman, tbonejack, and others).

diagnosis: obsession

you are obsessed with me no matter which version of your pathetic excuses we go with.
what was hm murdochs avi picture?
 

TBoneJack

Well-Known Member
@UncleBuck, give this a read. It mentions many reasons why Europe advanced faster than the rest of the world at and before the Industrial Revolution.

It was written by:

Philip T. Hoffman
Caltech ([email protected])
Research

http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrBT8nXKP5UIQ4A9SVXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTEzc2o5YXZhBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMyBHZ0aWQDVklQMzAxXzEEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1425971544/RO=10/RU=http://www.yale.edu/leitner/resources/papers/politicseconofeuropescompadv2.pdf/RK=0/RS=4pqnOGqBWa63mmRwe4BFShgZftY-

One obvious thing mentioned in the article is violence. The Europeans for some reason got real good at violence before the rest of the world, so they conquered and impeded the progress of other nations.

Also, they brought new diseases to the rest of the world that wiped out masses of people - while the Europeans were immune to these diseases. I somewhat guessed this as a reason and stated so in a previous post.

And more reasons are given in the article.

I never stated the advance of Europe was because of superior intelligence. I am not a white supremacist, and I am not a racist.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
what ever happened to KKKynes? Ever since I made my return, I have not seen him around. He must be too busy with his real life clan buddies...
That's a good question I was also wondering about.. His account page says 'error' so I assume he got banned.. Can't really say the dipshit didn't deserve it..
 

see4

Well-Known Member
@UncleBuck, give this a read. It mentions many reasons why Europe advanced faster than the rest of the world at and before the Industrial Revolution.

It was written by:

Philip T. Hoffman
Caltech ([email protected])
Research

http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrBT8nXKP5UIQ4A9SVXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTEzc2o5YXZhBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMyBHZ0aWQDVklQMzAxXzEEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1425971544/RO=10/RU=http://www.yale.edu/leitner/resources/papers/politicseconofeuropescompadv2.pdf/RK=0/RS=4pqnOGqBWa63mmRwe4BFShgZftY-

One obvious thing mentioned in the article is violence. The Europeans for some reason got real good at violence before the rest of the world, so they conquered and impeded the progress of other nations.

Also, they brought new diseases to the rest of the world that wiped out masses of people - while the Europeans were immune to these diseases. I somewhat guessed this as a reason and stated so in a previous post.

And more reasons are given in the article.

I never stated the advance of Europe was because of superior intelligence. I am not a white supremacist, and I am not a racist.

Except the only problem with this information is that it is not accurate, according to "A Short History of War", where we note that the first formal armies were "Sumer and Akkad", in the area known as present day Iraq. I don't want to spoil it for you, but these folks were very violent indeed.

And oddly, Europe has not been the foremost advanced society, unless you include the Romans as European. Some argue they were not. Many advances in technology, back then, were adopted from Chinese and other Asian culture. Like gunpowder, which changed the world forever.
 

TBoneJack

Well-Known Member
Except the only problem with this information is that it is not accurate, according to "A Short History of War", where we note that the first formal armies were "Sumer and Akkad", in the area known as present day Iraq. I don't want to spoil it for you, but these folks were very violent indeed.

And oddly, Europe has not been the foremost advanced society, unless you include the Romans as European. Some argue they were not. Many advances in technology, back then, were adopted from Chinese and other Asian culture. Like gunpowder, which changed the world forever.
What do you think are the reasons for the high number of European scientists and mathematicians who won Nobel prizes and Fields Medals, respectively?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top