Greengenes707
Well-Known Member
Shameless no doubt.
Good on you for keeping it real gg. eatum' up.....Shameless no doubt.
Damn Man! I didn't know u hated me like that?Good on you for keeping it real gg. eatum' up.....
If I was AP I'd separate myself from jimmy pronto and let the lights and GROWERS do the talking. Starting to wonder..
Actually kind of sick of what this forum has turned into. From helping people and GROWING...repeat...GROWING...into a f@cking COB advertisement. From optic, a company previously hawking cheap chinese crap no less. Morals showing up in their advertising.
Ahhh well...concentrate on whats right in the world and continue to give my cents....
I know some of these sellers just looove my opinion.
p.s. have a nice day and yes I did capitalize growing....
2 of the 200s would be better for coverage. What your ceiling height?looks like the cobs may be too close to each other on the 4cob panel. 2-2cob panels is probably better in every instance i assume.
I thought I was doing the right thing? Showing what the units I bought with my own $-Could do! That's it. It took me 25+years to get the knowledge I have. I hand in out like tick tacks to people that need it on here. For nothing in return. I give more than I take!I didn't.. And don't..
But opinions change as people change
I have my own strong opinions, on cobs and their worth, among other things. So when I see hype, and I'm not sure the hype is totally warranted I question it
That was aimed at me, right? I feel like we've been down this road before in a previous thread...hmm lol.Shameless no doubt.
Ive got a four cob optic box. i think you are right. The 360 light would be a better value if it were stretched out. Im addressing this opportunity by extending the structure and adding 2 cxb 3590s to pontoons on each end.looks like the cobs may be too close to each other on the 4cob panel. 2-2cob panels is probably better in every instance i assume.
what temp u got? 360watt in a 17in x 17in case would be just right I think! there considering sizing the 200 watt box up too 7in x 17in! I told em about what I thought the 360 should be and he didn't say nothing back!Ive got a four cob optic box. i think you are right. The 360 light would be a better value if it were stretched out. Im addressing this opportunity by extending the structure and adding 2 cxb 3590s to pontoons on each end.
I have no questions about the effectiveness of the basic optic 360 light. it grew large, ripe, potent flowers for me, first try.
4k, flowers were really superb.what temp u got? 360watt in a 17in x 17in case would be just right I think!
It should be clear to most here that GreenGenes and I are both entering into a new market of lighting and that we are naturally poised to compete with one another in any necessary fashion. I'd like to think that we can both be joyful of the fact that we're leading the way for this market in a noble manner and not in the same way some money-hungry companies do, who, on the contrary, lack any real roots to their customer base.Good on you for keeping it real gg. eatum' up.....
I think it was @robincnn who said in a different thread that reflectors dropped total light output quite dramatically through the buildup of heat (reduced COB efficiency) and that lenses most likely followed the same trend.4k, flowers were really superb.
The pontoon cxbs are 3k @ 50w x 4.
Agree 17 x 17 would be an improvement.
i think an optic vero 360 could be 20 x 20" and with no lenses and highly reflective environment would maxout one or two plants in a 28 x 28" with good training and ~12 / 14" canopy to cob space. (assuming vero 29s emitting 80 watts)
ya you can easily remove the lenses. On my last grow i had plants of very different heights. I lensed 2 cobs to match the (lack of) height of one plant. The other taller plant was under bare cobs. It worked out.I think it was @robincnn who said in a different thread that reflectors dropped total light output quite dramatically through the buildup of heat (reduced COB efficiency) and that lenses most likely followed the same trend.
Can you take and leave off the lenses from the Optic fixtures?
It should be clear to most here that GreenGenes and I are both entering into a new market of lighting and that we are naturally poised to compete with one another in any necessary fashion. I'd like to think that we can both be joyful of the fact that we're leading the way for this market in a noble manner and not in the same way some money-hungry companies do, who, on the contrary, lack any real roots to their customer base.
And as for Jimmy, he's been my dedicated consigliere; please don't second guess him after cheering for GG, as it makes me wonder...
I can see your frustration with the advertisements, not only the paid ones that pop now but the ones for Twilight, Optic, and hell even my own HB. I admit that I've put my brand out there not thinking about other's opinions but at the same time, if you have something to offer to others, who don't know a whole lot about COB lighting, that is something they're looking for, whether they know it or not, aren't you going to raise your hands and say LOOK - I got what you need!
I quite take the point that there's a danger the LED forum could turn into an LED advertising forum. Perhaps there are enough posters like you who will push back hard enough so the advertising stays within some sort of acceptable limits. I hope so. Some of the other forums I went to seeking info were pretty lame in that regard.I do see a lot of companies calling themselves growers... Only a few actually strike me as real old school underground. The rest kinda look like fakers....