Does it matter if they are off by 2/3? Is 2 million dead OK but 6 million not?
Ok, so how many Jews do you think the Nazis killed? You must have an idea for a lower estimate...
Yes it does matter very much for instance Russia killed every second Ukrainian may be look up Holodomer ??? Do you see Ukrainians crying as much as the JEWS ?? i mean really and its estimates are 2.5 - 7.5 million killed
Now some may same well its not the same Sure it is i mean whats the difference between putting a bullet in some ones head???
Or force them into a Gas chamber ??? or starving them to death its forced upon them so SAME THING
Now common sense tell everyone Jews have been persecuted for ever so again lets break it down
Vital events constitute one of the components of population dynamics; the others are migration and, for a group like the Jews, adhesion and withdrawal. In a "closed" population, unaffected by migrations and by adhesions or withdrawals, the numerical evolution depends entirely on the balance of births and deaths. The natural increase (or decrease) is indeed of fundamental importance for the future of any population, but the migratory changes may counteract the vital balance for some time. For example, despite strong natural increase, there was probably no growth in the total number of Jews in Eastern Europe at the beginning of the 20th century because of extensive emigration, mostly to America. On the other hand, among Jewish populations in Central and Western Europe throughout the 20th century prevailing natural decrease was outweighed or at least compensated by a positive migratory balance.
The limited data available from some European cities in the 18th century give the impression that Jewish mortality was already declining. There is ample documentation to show the systematic decline of Jewish mortality all over Europe throughout the 19th century, though there was some time lag between this development among the Jews in the countries of Central and Western Europe, on the one hand, and of Eastern Europe, on the other. In any country of Europe and at any time during the 19th century, the crude death rate of the Jews was almost always lower than that of the entire population of the respective country
Its proven FACT that many of the Events that occured have been Exaggerated
Its like saying John , luke and mark knew JESUS which truth is they NEVER even sat at a dinner table or talked all here say but again its got to be true RIGHT
Luke: Did not know Jesus directly, but gathered His information from eye witnesses and the Apostles. Luke was very careful and detailed in His account.
Mark: Did not know Jesus, and was actually the traveling companion of Paul and Barnabas (who later caused them to split up) *read Acts( which was also written by Luke).* It is said, though not proven, that Peter (the disciple/Apostle) may have dictated the Gospel of Mark to him. It is known that Peter took Mark on to be a disciple for a time.
John: This book is the most widely debated because it's content differs from the others. However, it is thought of to be written by the Apostle John, who knew Jesus very well, and who also outlived the rest of the Apostles. John may have written the book from a different persepctive to shed light on areas that the other gospels did not cover, which would make John's Gospel the last to be written.
its like truth fully saying your a minority now that you are WHITE and its true