The 5% that puts us over the topHumans cannot possibly be the main reason given we only produce 5% of the CO2 created or released into the atmosphere...
The 5% that puts us over the topHumans cannot possibly be the main reason given we only produce 5% of the CO2 created or released into the atmosphere...
LolThe 5% that puts us over the top
it must suck real bad to have such a tiny penis and get cucked by your fat wife so often.There is a hiatus. It has been going on for nearly two decades. That is a simple fact.
yeah, totally.The 97% has always been contrived bullshit perpetuated by ignoramuses.
So the peer review process just completely missed that huh? The overwhelming majority of the world's climate scientists are just ignoramuses who contrive bullshit and human's are not the cause of global warming, because you say so. You. A dumb ass on a pot forum.You see? This is what makes you an asswagon. Fact is that only 2% of those same papers cite humans as the main reason for global warming.
No, he said that it was flawed. he was wrong though, since it passed peer review. You probably shouldn't have discussions about any kind of science until you learn basic critical thinking skills.He cited your own peer reviewed research but you were too obtuse to notice.
oh, you poor, stupid, tiny penis having loser.Humans cannot possibly be the main reason given we only produce 5% of the CO2 created or released into the atmosphere...
i posted an infographic that even a child can understand with people like you and ANALEXCESS in mind.
No, wrong again, asswagon. My statement is based on data from those SAME peer-reviewed articles you hold dear. Not saying they "missed" anything. You, seriously, are not very bright.So the peer review process just completely missed that huh? The overwhelming majority of the world's climate scientists are just ignoramuses who contrive bullshit and human's are not the cause of global warming, because you say so. You. A dumb ass on a pot forum.
Yet you expect to be taken seriously...
No, he said that it was flawed. he was wrong though, since it passed peer review. You probably shouldn't have discussions about any kind of science until you learn basic critical thinking skills.
Let me see if I get this straight, since I'm an ass wagon who is not very bright.No, wrong again, asswagon. My statement is based on data from those SAME peer-reviewed articles you hold dear. Not saying they "missed" anything. You, seriously, are not very bright.
You really need to step up your game if you want to be taken seriously by those of us who actually matter.Let me see if I get this straight, since I'm an ass wagon who is not very bright.
YOUR SAYING:
The conclusion of the meta-analysis study, which was peer reviewed, does not follow from the data it cites.
AND:
The peer review process did not miss this obvious flaw.
YET:
It is still flawed, yet passed peer review.
AND:
It is contrived bullshit, by ignoramuses.
BUT:
You expect to be taken seriously.
Not following orders should not get you killed.It's quite simple, when the cop says any of these phrases "I'm placing you under arrest", "Put your hands behind your back" or any variant of those, you cease all dialogue and physically comply. Those statements mean you are being taken to the beginning of your journey through the legal system and that NOTHING you say or do is going to prevent that reality. If you don't do exactly that, any number of bad things could and SHOULD happen to you. If you don't agree with that last statement, you're an idiot.
I don't need to be taken seriously. Peer reviewed research on the other hand...You really need to step up your game if you want to be taken seriously by those of us who actually matter.
Shouldn't get you killed, but it definitely deserves a swift and brutal education of how to conduct yourself during an arrest.Not following orders should not get you killed.
Reaching for a gun while repeatedly being told not to? Well, that might get you killed.
Me either. Hey look, gas just went down to $1.95, they won't be able to burn that shit fast enough.I don't need to be taken seriously. Peer reviewed research on the other hand...
Both recent shootings involved black men with guns with criminal histories who did not follow orders. It isn't surprising they were killed. Not by white people either in at least one of the cases. I'm still waiting for leftists crying about racist police to explain why east Asians have no problems whatsoever in their community with this type of violence. I guess it's selective racism?Shouldn't get you killed, but it definitely deserves a swift and brutal education of how to conduct yourself during an arrest.
Yet they expect to be taken seriously...i posted an infographic that even a child can understand with people like you and ANALEXCESS in mind.
you are welcome.
your penis is incredibly tiny.
No, they don't. Dude, you're the only one who is saying that they expect to be taken seriously. Believe me, idiots realize that they are stupid, they just don't like to admit it.Yet they expect to be taken seriously...
You could be right, maybe they don't expect to be taken seriously, but I definitely think they hope to be.No, they don't. Dude, you're the only one who is saying that they expect to be taken seriously. Believe me, idiots realize that they are stupid, they just don't like to admit it.
How's that legislation coming along?Yet they expect to be taken seriously...