Senator Sanders, in his own words

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
And he is STILL 100% better than any shithead the DNC will put forth in the next decade.

Trump 2020 bro?
That's not a valid appraisal of the situation. You see, by fracturing the DNC, he actually handed all 3 branches of the gov't to the other party. If he had actually been running for president, I'm sure he would have done better than to lose so badly to Clinton.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
That's not a valid appraisal of the situation. You see, by fracturing the DNC, he actually handed all 3 branches of the gov't to the other party. If he had actually been running for president, I'm sure he would have done better than to lose so badly to Clinton.
True this. Bernie is OK but insufficient. He's very divisive leader who hasn't gotten much done unless you want to count a few solar water heaters installed on govt buildings and renaming a post office.

But he's passionate about the change that he can't accomplish.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
That's not a valid appraisal of the situation. You see, by fracturing the DNC, he actually handed all 3 branches of the gov't to the other party. If he had actually been running for president, I'm sure he would have done better than to lose so badly to Clinton.
Lol all three branches?

As if the Democraps hadn't lost the House, the Senate, the majority of Statehouses and state governorships while Mr Obama was still in his first term?

Tell us another one!
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
True this. Bernie is OK but insufficient. He's very divisive leader who hasn't gotten much done unless you want to count a few solar water heaters installed on govt buildings and renaming a post office.

But he's passionate about the change that he can't accomplish.
At least he is passionate about wanting to and if he gets the power of the Executive, you may find that he'll be more effective than you think. I'm certainly willing to give him the chance.

Good knows the Democrats have had plenty of opportunities and they've proven beyond any doubt they don't WANT such change.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
At least he is passionate about wanting to and if he gets the power of the Executive, you may find that he'll be more effective than you think. I'm certainly willing to give him the chance.

Good knows the Democrats have had plenty of opportunities and they've proven beyond any doubt they don't WANT such change.
Children are passionate but don't accomplish much,

I'm willing to listen during the debates and decide then. "Getting stuff done" can't be the only figure of merit. Why nothing of import was done should figure into one's decisions too. Assuming Oprah runs, we'd have to decide about her without any experience or opportunity to get something done. Obama wasn't that prolific but he was a junior senator and had only a few years. Sanders had twelve years as a Senator and has pretty much nothing to show for it. He chose to be an independent which put him in poor position to enact change. That's why I keep harping on his piddly track record.

In this way, he's more like you. He carps from the sidelines as if passionate but futile carping is useful. Sanders certainly had the opportunity to work with others in the interest of accomplishing objectives but he chose not to. You talk as if carping from the sidelines and WANTing change is something noble. Actually his noise is divisive and distracting.

The healthcare bill he introduced is an example of a harmful action because Democrats have to win in conservative districts in order to win the house. That bill is poison to them. It's an example of why Bernie got nothing done and why hes a divisive leader, not one who can bring people together to get work done.

Sturm und Drang
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Voting to extend the debt ceiling is not an indicator that he's in the bag for big banks.

You thinking it is would be an indicator that you need to learn more about economics.

Running a deficit isn't necessarily a bad thing. If it is so excessive that inflation spikes that's when you dial it back.

I think what is important to know about "economics" is what is a symptom, what is a cause and what is manufactured bullshit.

The prevailing monetary system used in the world is based in something very "unequal" and backed by force, therefore it's a bad thing. If you can elaborate on how Bernie will do away with that scam and replace it with something resembling freedom, I'd be happy to hear your astute argument.

Maintaining a grip on running other peoples lives IS necessarily a bad thing. Bernie wants to force people to do things, his things, which is undeniable. You failed to address that in your weak attempt to defend Bernie.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Arguably it is weird to build a hole above the ground to crap in, but putting in a wooden chair to sit on when you’re drunk or just tired is not sanitary, so in the west we build the chair of porcelain as well.

Modern muslim toilet.


One upside, no bitching about leaving a seat up.


If there had been a bathroom like this in Uncle Bucks town during his teenage years it might have saved us all from a lot of lame "@Uncle Buck shat on the floor at Wendy's " jokes.
 
Last edited:

schuylaar

Well-Known Member





You should write your congressman about the risks muslim squatters who don’t was their hands pose for employees in the US.
Have you not seen a tissue seat cover dispensary in the bathroom? Maybe it’s ladies only thing?

I find it disgusting when I see dirty shoe prints on a public restroom seat.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
If there had been a bathroom like this in Uncle Bucks town during his teenage years it might have saved us all from a lot of lame "Uncle Buck shat on the floor at Wendy's " jokes.
You know this was on purpose for his friend to clean.

Bucky was quite the cherub and a handful I’m sure..I really wish he had a boy and could’ve experienced a mini version of himself..:lol:
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Bernie can't be "against big banks". Since he's voted to extend the debt ceiling.

Bernie can't be "against war" . Since he's voted for a budget which fully funds the military, ie the continuation of the military industrial complex and empire.

Bernie has no economic reasoning ability. He's never laid out any way to fund his ideas which have any basis in economic reality and which don't rely on imaginary numbers.

Bernie can't possibly be "for equality", since all of his programs lack the option of participating or not for the average person. That means his idea is "more equal" than any person who prefers not to participate and their choices not to participate are removed in favor of his mandatory choices.

Bernie isn't "against using guns offensively". How else would he enforce his policies against people who decline them? if his policies came into being, people would be forced to follow them, under pain of government gun threats for noncompliance. His ideas would INCREASE THE THREAT OF violence.

Bernie campaigned for Hillary. That should raise suspicion he's just part of the circus, not to mention his voting with her over 90% of the time.




Not to mention, Bernie's suspected criminal wife.

She's large enough to be the first and second lady simultaneously and she needs to fire her hair dresser. Not since Barbara Bush would there have been a less fuckable first lady.

Even Michelle Obama, the Idiot Bush wife and Kankles herself scored higher on the first lady fuckability chart. A serious let down after Foxy Melania, yes a very serious letdown.
Boo! Talk about a letdown post..I thought you were better than that last paragraph- really admired you..regarding the first portion of your soapbox? There’s only two ways to vote..
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
you said you couldn't stand his old man smell
It wasn’t old man; it was death..since that time I’ve never smelled that smell on anyone except a cop within the last month who was talking big about the Parkland debacle.

It’s not easy to tell someone you can see or smell death on them.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
At least he is passionate about wanting to and if he gets the power of the Executive, you may find that he'll be more effective than you think. I'm certainly willing to give him the chance.

Good knows the Democrats have had plenty of opportunities and they've proven beyond any doubt they don't WANT such change.
Pelosi is on record there’re not changing a thing. They don’t know how to do anything without corporate money they’ve been doing it so long..least of all working for ‘we the people’.

That’s okay ‘we the people’ are catching on with strength in numbers rather than allow the divide and conquer tactics.

I’m proud of the ‘teacher on strike’ map I saw this morning right through the Bible Belt:clap:
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
You know this was on purpose for his friend to clean.

Bucky was quite the cherub and a handful I’m sure..I really wish he had a boy and could’ve experienced a mini version of himself..:lol:
Yes, I am aware teen agers do some silly things. I got a lot of mileage out of it though. :fire:
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Yes, I am aware teen agers do some silly things. I got a lot of mileage out of it though. :fire:
yes, me pranking my friend almost two decades ago was a nice distraction for you from the fact that you are a pedophile and a white supremacist cretin
 

rollitupuser666

New Member
I know this isnt the place to post this but i cant work out how to post im new here in terms of trying to post, anyway i have a question.

I plan to winterize but i dont have a buchner ect so i plan to pour the winterized product into my open blast column, seal it up place a small amount of butane inside and force over the filters.
My issue is the evaporation and i had an idea!! could i release my winterized filtered product into a large body of water and have the oil seperate from the alcohol?

So would i be right in thinking the alcohol will bond with the water leaving my oil and i can pour away the water containing alcohol.
Then obviously vac purge the water out the oil????
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Boo! Talk about a letdown post..I thought you were better than that last paragraph- really admired you..regarding the first portion of your soapbox? There’s only two ways to vote..
The last part was probably mean, you're right, but didn't seem inappropriate given the levity and inanity that occurs here.

A vote is ultimately a threat against your peaceful, but of a different opinion, neighbor. The reason that is so, your vote enables people to force your neighbor to comply with something or other they don't endorse. Further, since your neighbor is being peaceful voting to force them to do or not do X , can only be seen as a threat if we are to use the same way of judging government as we would normal people. Which part of what I just said isn't true?
 
Top