DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
They only carry two bombs each, but if the hit nearly 100% of the time, a dozen could take out a stopped column. I think in this war at least, drones would be a better option for close air support, both bomb droppers and cheap killer drones that can kill em in their foxholes from miles away or take out defensive positions on highway junctions and armor.How many Bayraktar drones can you buy for 110b?....
View attachment 5106944
I think armor has become obsolete, even APCs, Stinger took choppers and close air support off the table too. Infantry is king again, switchblades can take out gun artillery in range and rocket launchers too. Forces won't be concentrated, but spread out into tank hunter teams with air defense for tactical air. You don't need massed armor to stop tanks any more, rockets and drones can do it. Now they just have to beat them up bad enough before the ground dries out and they can get off the roads. I don't see the Russians lasting more than a few weeks at their causality rate and at the rate their supplies are being destroyed. The Ukrainians have vast man power reserves in theater and arms and equipment for them. It's common sense to build a big army of infantry, equipped with modern and old soviet weapons, to eject the Russians and beat them quickly, before Vlad can muster additional forces, if he can. They don't need tanks or choppers, they need light trucks and jeeps and they don't need months of training either. They don't need psychological or physical conditioning, though they will get that too, they need weapons and tactics training, chemical warfare seminars, how to read maps and how to use soviet mortars and communicate on radios.