We don't have a Parliament that allows for it..we are the Great American Experiment and like it or not it's two parties- we have faction within each of the two which is almost like proportional rule.I am good with the ideas of more parties and not having blind allegiances. Politics should be more local anyway, the democrat of Iowa is a republican in the northeast. Also, I like that a party has to earn your vote.
Still don't have the slightest clue what xtshos grievances are with the dems as a party, but that's cool. Only thing I ever figured out was he was mad about blm riots messing up his city, but eh, who knows. I'm mad that the homeless have messed up ours, we are dem run so they are responsible for the situation...more so than they were for riots, but still, I see two options and it's D or R. Feel free to go with a different one, but keep in mind what the other guy is doing and if you split to stay fully pure with your views then you may wind up with the least desired option.
It's a catch 22 situation, I'm really jealous of those other countries with like 10 parties and proportional rule that allows the 2% of total voters that vote for the green party or whatever to have a say. That isn't how it works here. Your minority 3rd party vote means nothing. We can't get to something better as if one side or the other sheds voters to a 3rd party, then the other monolith crushes them both.