wyteboi
Well-Known Member
You went to school , work, and came home in an hour ??Flight 93. Sorry for making you wait, had school then work.
You went to school , work, and came home in an hour ??Flight 93. Sorry for making you wait, had school then work.
On a side note, if I have offended anyone by attacking their intelligence, I apologize. I do not mean to insult you as a person, but obviously this is a subject that I am emotionally invested in because of my friend and therefore can get pretty heated regarding the subject.Wow dude I have never seen a post that was so FACTUALLY inaccurate on this forum to date.
You have the wrong planes, the wrong fuel load, the wrong fuel type, your understanding of thermite is NON EXISTENT. you understand nothing being presented here because you refuse to read any of the evidence shown. IE you do not think for yourself because you are completely close minded.
As I said, I had the correct planes - 767s, and correct fuel loads 24,000. My understanding of thermite is correct, its Iron Oxide and Aluminum. It is extremely flammable and could not have survived the fireball that was the gas igniting. Please, do not simple tell me I am wrong, tell me WHY I am wrong.
If you really think that the planes aluminum deconstructed itself into a powder, then combined with rust from steel girders that are painted and covered with spray on asbestos and then somehow got the 2500F heat required to start the reaction you sir are the truly uneducated. You don't need a chemistry degree, thermite can get so hot that it will glow red, and yet still it will not start the reaction, you need something 4-5 times hotter than Jet fuel ( Which is NOT gasoline) burns at in open air. All these supposed "Facts" you are throwing out there have all been THOROUGHLY debunked as false, all of them.
I never said it did this to make a thermite like explosion. I was making an argument about the supposed presence of thermite residue. Thermite is one of the most difficult combustibles to explode. It is chaotic, meaning it would not make a clean cut through support beams. Instead, its makes a giant hole by the area of detonation. If you look at picture of the support beams, there are clean cuts. It would also require about 5 lbs of thermite just to make a hole through a car "shell". Obviously, the outside is much less stable than the support beams of a monstrous tower. With this being said, how much thermite would you need to blast a hole in a very strong tower and then have it burn for 6 weeks (how long some fires lasted at the site)? You would need tons and tons of it to accomplish this.
When you can come up with some provable facts please post back, otherwise read the whole thread so you don't have to keep sticking your foot in your mouth, only to take said foot out and replace it with the other foot. Thermite does not explode. LOL just another "Fact" you got wrong.
Wow, I said explode instead of ignite, I must be an idiot or something!
Your posts did make me laugh though, +rep to you!!
I meant for not responding to everyone... school in the morning, came home for lunch, responded to you, went to work at 2:30 - it was slow, so I got off early after only 2.5 hours at 5:15ish.You went to school , work, and came home in an hour ??
that sounds like the same fishy timeline on sep 11th...betcha he was in on it tooYou went to school , work, and came home in an hour ??
On a side note, if I have offended anyone by attacking their intelligence, I apologize. I do not mean to insult you as a person, but obviously this is a subject that I am emotionally invested in because of my friend and therefore can get pretty heated regarding the subject.
Keep em coming!
They are coming , you just seem to only want to respond to the weaker one here....... ME .Keep em coming!
of course it goes down..... right into its own footprint?"even 8 year olds who play Jenga know if you fuck with the bottom of the tower it goes down
I didnt say bush did it....AT ALL. But yes he was involved somehow because he was president at the time. He could not of carried that one out by himself.I think bush is an idiot but to say he would set the US up for an attack is just plain crazy
No one is claiming bush was a lone attacker ... he may not have been in on the planning part ... but it is certain he knew about it. We won't know for sure what really happen that day until we have a full independent investigation. That's the point of all of this.I think bush is an idiot but to say he would set the US up for an attack is just plain crazy
No who said it ?[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"In the simplicity of their minds, people more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have such impudence. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and continue to think that there may be some other explanation."
[/FONT]Anyone know who said this? Its a quiz.
No who said it ?