Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
...but that was the OT.What about Exodus 21:17? "And he that curseth his father, or his mother, shall surely be put to death."
(you and me both know it will continue on like this...)
...but that was the OT.What about Exodus 21:17? "And he that curseth his father, or his mother, shall surely be put to death."
...but that was the OT.
(you and me both know it will continue on like this...)
Nice of you to completely ignore the cursing aspect of Ex 21:17 that I brought up.The definition of smite - To destroy the life of by beating, or by weapons of any kind; to slay by a blow; to kill; as, to smite one with the sword, or with an arrow or other instrument.
Therefor to smite is to kill. That then means that Exodus 21:15 says that if a child kills his parents than he or she shall be put to death. So if a child kills his parents they are violating two commandments.
“Yet for all that, when they are in the land of their enemies, I will not cast them away, nor shall I abhor them, to utterly destroy them and break My covenant with them; for I am the Lord their God. But for their sake I will remember the covenant of their ancestors, whom I brought out of the land of Egypt in the sight of the nations, that I might be their God: I am the Lord.”That is true, what people need to realize that the old testament is the law that convicts us of our sins. The new testament is the new covenant, the good news that Jesus was the ultimate sacrifice for our sins. He came to save us from the convictions. All men sin but only Jesus saves.
Nice of you to completely ignore the cursing aspect of Ex 21:17 that I brought up.
What did I bypass? Did I not do as I said I would and debunk your claims. Like I said in my last post. I proved my point. Why don't you try looking at something other than the usual passages. Dig deeper, read more, and come back with something of real substance.Yeah...he bypassed a couple more questions too...
“Yet for all that, when they are in the land of their enemies, I will not cast them away, nor shall I abhor them, to utterly destroy them and break My covenant with them; for I am the Lord their God. But for their sake I will remember the covenant of their ancestors, whom I brought out of the land of Egypt in the sight of the nations, that I might be their God: I am the Lord.”
(Lev. 26:44–45)
God is real. Jesus is a fraud.
So with a wave of your hand you dismiss the idea that execution of children that curse their parents is not evil, yet you provide no explanation except to say that I'm reading out of context and that it goes hand-in-hand with smiting parents. You said you would explain yet you don't even go to the trouble of putting it in context and describing how it is similar to your answer for Ex 21:15.crackerboy said:sorry if you felt left out. I don't spend all of my time on this site. Besides that Exodus 21:15 & 17 go hand and hand. I think that I have proven my point. This could potentially go on for ever. My point was simple. That point is that most people do just as you all are doing. You are not looking at those passages in the proper context. So yes, when you only read those individual passages they can seem to say something completely different. But if you just take the time and study instead of nit pick than you will see the true meanings.
Yes, it is referring to the old covenant telling the Hebrews that it will remain in effect. IOW, God doesn't change his mind. He might make a new covenant with people but that doesn't replace the ones he already made. The Mosaic covenant should be considered in full force and effect yet Xtians want to disregard almost all of it (except the Decalogue and any passage that pertains to homosexuals).This chapter is called the promise of Blessing and Retribution. This whole chapter is about how God will keep his promise even when we are unfaithful. I really don't see how this shows God or the Bible in a negative way. It actually confirms what I have been saying. This is referring to the old covenant which was replaced by Jesus and his new covenant.
So I guess the false messiah and the anti-christ didn't read Revelation, otherwise they would know they don't win.I think is IMAGE of Jesus is a fraud now a days.
-If you remember correctly I mentioned Idol worship?
I mean seriously...Mind Control. The media controls/censors EVERYTHING. So why not control Religion?? Something that is so powerful in EVERY SINGLE PERSONS LIFE. No matter what, you make a conscious decision(Sometime in your life) about whether or not you believe in God!
God will always be there for you. You just have to trust Him.
I love Moses story. He saved a NATION! The Israelites. Ever heard of the Holy Land, The Promised Land? Our Saviour Jesus Christ came then. Now, the Devil has control over the masses. There will be a False Messiah!!!!!!! He will be powerful. Like no other being we have ever fathomed. But dont fret...We will all be saved. He will come again!
Here were the one's you failed to answer...What did I bypass? Did I not do as I said I would and debunk your claims. Like I said in my last post. I proved my point. Why don't you try looking at something other than the usual passages. Dig deeper, read more, and come back with something of real substance.
So with a wave of your hand you dismiss the idea that execution of children that curse their parents is not evil, yet you provide no explanation except to say that I'm reading out of context and that it goes hand-in-hand with smiting parents. You said you would explain yet you don't even go to the trouble of putting it in context and describing how it is similar to your answer for Ex 21:15.
Yes, it is referring to the old covenant telling the Hebrews that it will remain in effect. IOW, God doesn't change his mind. He might make a new covenant with people but that doesn't replace the ones he already made. The Mosaic covenant should be considered in full force and effect yet Xtians want to disregard almost all of it (except the Decalogue and any passage that pertains to homosexuals).
[youtube]OtIyx687ytk[/youtube]
Here were the one's you failed to answer...
-Does everyone who follows a totally different religion other than christianity go to hell?
-What makes your God so much more special, and credible, than all the others?
Oh, I see, now you're doing my homework? What happened to the offer, " I ask you to show me a passage that tells man to do evil and I will help you to understand what it is really telling you to do." ? Don't go around blaming me for not researching something you said you would explain.Fine if you must make me do your homework for you than I will explain what the word curse meant to the Hebrew people.
It's only serious business if it is true. An all-powerful god should realize that there is no such thing as a literal curse and he wouldn't condemn people to death for superstitious nonsense. You can't have it both ways, that the bible was either written by god and should demonstrate that by giving us answers and moral guidance that could not be known by men at the time, or it was merely written by superstitious, bronze-age goat herders that created their own laws and only attributed them to a god. If that's the case, then we should give the book no more relevance than Homer or Plato and our belief in Yahweh should be no stronger than it is for Zeus and should give the story of Noah and the ark no more credence than Atlantis.It did not have the same meaning as we use it today. The Hebrews believed that when you cursed someone that you where not just calling them an ass hole like today. When one person cursed another they where essentially releasing demons on that person and that curse would become literal. This is a form of paganism. So yes it is very serious business.
Oh, I see, now you're doing my homework? What happened to the offer, " I ask you to show me a passage that tells man to do evil and I will help you to understand what it is really telling you to do." ? Don't go around blaming me for not researching something you said you would explain.
It's only serious business if it is true. An all-powerful god should realize that there is no such thing as a literal curse and he wouldn't condemn people to death for superstitious nonsense. You can't have it both ways, that the bible was either written by god and should demonstrate that by giving us answers and moral guidance that could not be known by men at the time, or it was merely written by superstitious, bronze-age goat herders that created their own laws and only attributed them to a god. If that's the case, then we should give the book no more relevance than Homer or Plato and our belief in Yahweh should be no stronger than it is for Zeus and should give the story of Noah and the ark no more credence than Atlantis.