You know, I think I'll respond to this one. CPU's website is
http://cannabispatientsunited.org/ and their core principles and position papers are right there, clear as day.
My affiliations become important when I post as a member of an organization. I am a physician, and I am posting as such. My opinions are mine and mine alone.
Cpu's stance on p2p is that the law as written is what it is. 1 patient, 12 plants. 1 caregiver, 5 patients. Caregiver to their registered patient is protected by the act. They deal with what ares, not what ifs. p2p is a what if.
My personal stance mirrors that of CPU. I deal with what the act specifically allows. As far as p2p goes, that issue is before the Michigan SC. Until they rule, the issue is unsettled. Because folks are getting arrested over it, I don't recommend it. But I do recommend if you want to transfer to someone for compensation, make sure there is a registry connection between you for safety. I kind of like Komorn's 'easy as 1, 2, 3' Level 1 risk= clearly legal like caregiver to registered patient. Level 3 risk, clearly illegal like the current status of sales of marijuana as defined by the last court to rule on it, COA McQueen. Level 2 somewhere in between.
I base my recommendation on level 1 risk. I don't recommend anything in level 2 or 3.
Guess that sums me up. But everyone already knew that about me.
Dr. Bob