NewSchoolgrower
Active Member
Your right. Its not enough lumens..lol.. Your right lol..
New way of growing. No electricity. Stealth.
- Thread starter NewSchoolgrower
- Start date
PJ Diaz
Well-Known Member
iblazetoomuch
Active Member
You used enough electricity in this thread to run a cheap chinese ufo LED to grow instead, but I like the concept of not having to use electricity though, just not in this form; light refraction doesn't seem to have as much potential as it did when I read the first post, lol.
NewSchoolgrower
Active Member
They suggest 5000 lumens a sq ft. So if each bottle is 675 lumens x 100 bottles that's 67,500 lumens Divided by 10 is 6750 lumens per square foot.. So it would take 100 bottles for a 10 sq ft.grow space.
Since the diameter of a cok3 bottle is 4 inches that's 180watts per linear foot. Isn't that like 720watts per square foot? I still think its feasible
Since the diameter of a cok3 bottle is 4 inches that's 180watts per linear foot. Isn't that like 720watts per square foot? I still think its feasible
iblazetoomuch
Active Member
Thats quite interesting but, remember tesla probably was using currents of some kind....I don't think he was exactly using "electricity free" means in that theory of grabbing electricity from the air, I assume maybe he meant high atomsphere? (alot of charged particles up there)
I've never read that quote or context of it before, but given his past dealings and inventions always having to deal with arcs and currents, but I guess its possible if they had a theory it could have just as easily included some materials that conduct the currents from the air without electricity.
I did find one relevant article, but it has a pic of his lab and the tower he built which was involving high currents I believe, don't know for sure.
http://arcanumdeepsecrets.wordpress...nt-solution-to-the-planetary-energy-‘crisis’/
Thanks anyhow, I never had really heard of his estimate, but I certainly believe that is quite plausible in higher atmospheric conditions.
NewSchoolgrower
Active Member
If 1 sqft of bottles makes 6750 lumens and weed only needs 5000 lumens per sqft how won't that work?? Lol
675 is only average lumens. Peak is 1400 per bottle.
Admit Im right lol
675 is only average lumens. Peak is 1400 per bottle.
Admit Im right lol
kpmarine
Well-Known Member
You're still not understanding that plastic would be more efficient. It's simple: A coke bottle is going to have more light focused at a point, the plastic sheets will allow more light through with less blockage. Seriously, you're out of your element Donny.
NewSchoolgrower
Active Member
It says transparent sheets have less lumens in the study i provided. Page 27 or 28 compares the bottles to transparent sheets. Plus transparent sheets are not very stealthy
NewSchoolgrower
Active Member
You're just simply wrong. I'll provide the figures in 1 second
NewSchoolgrower
Active Member
Bulb was like 1054 lumens and transparent plastic was like 241 lumens.. The bulb is better than plastic during sunny and cloudy days.. I prevail... U fail. .not me..Im right lol..it can be done..
NewSchoolgrower
Active Member
To sum everything up, I was right and proved it MANY times over...
1 sqft of bottles is 6750 lumens.
1 sqft of weed requires 5000 lumens to grow.
I win... Simple as that fools..
1 sqft of bottles is 6750 lumens.
1 sqft of weed requires 5000 lumens to grow.
I win... Simple as that fools..
kpmarine
Well-Known Member
You're still not registering how the bottle acts like a light collector for the area of the bottle. It focuses the light, you keep ignoring this. Based on your logic, a ceiling of magnifying glasses would be the best way to build a greenhouse.
kpmarine
Well-Known Member
NewSchoolgrower
Active Member
Regardless. Each bottle is 675-1400 lumens and 60watts. Its just like a 60w light bulb that puts out 675-1400 lumens.. Its no different than a light bulb.
Except it doesn't need electricity lol
Except it doesn't need electricity lol
kpmarine
Well-Known Member
Oh, you're one of those people who read something one time and decided to disregard the laws of physics. Okay, it's cool, you'll eventually figure it out.
NewSchoolgrower
Active Member
Lol i win good sir.. Well that was a rather good win id say.Tigerblood. ..WINNING!!
I AM WINNING!!
I AM WINNING!!
NewSchoolgrower
Active Member
Lol buddy. Each solar bottle produces 675 lumens...lol FACT!!...HOW? I DON'T KNOW... BUT IT DOES..
kpmarine
Well-Known Member
The most you are winning right now is a participation ribbon at the special Olympics. Everyone else but you sees that. Like I said though, have fun with your grow. If you can't see how coke bottles will concentrate lights into points, thus artificially increasing lumens at one point of the bottle, then I will say your grow journals will be interesting.
echelon1k1
New Member
http://www.thrivemovement.com/the_code-new_energy_technology
you'll find some good info about Zero Point/Free Energy
People have built prototypes that are shown in the doco, you could potentially hash out some sources from the link
Interesting to know how you go...
NewSchoolgrower
Active Member
The fact of the matter is once they are installed they are identical to a 60w light producing 675 lumens.. Are u retarded?? If it produces 675 lumens then that's what it produces if that's what light measuring instruments say... Fack. ..dumb...ppl...
Similar threads
