How many gun laws do you think this kid broke?perhaps the fact that the rounds were in his pocket rather than in the gun ready to shoot means there was only 2 victims rather than the many more it could have been
is this a case of california's gun laws helping in part to stop this being worse?
well this time he had a pocket full of shells rather than a magazine full of themHow many gun laws do you think this kid broke?
How did those gun laws help again?
It was a double barreled shotgun....well this time he had a pocket full of shells rather than a magazine full of them
If you are implying that registration would prevent those previously convicted of felonies from buying or owning guns, then what is the purpose of a background check? Are you just dumb, or is your proglodyte mind failing you?are you playing dumb or is your old memory just failing you?
Prove that the gun was legally purchased, and in fact belongs to YOU.What would registration accomplish?
no, more stringent, tougher requirements would never catch the odd criminal here and there.If you are implying that registration would prevent those previously convicted of felonies from buying or owning guns, then what is the purpose of a background check? Are you just dumb, or is your proglodyte mind failing you?
You only want the criminals to have legal guns?I thought you wanted to get illegal guns out of criminals hands .... or is the inconvenience of it all just not worth it to you?
lolIt was a double barreled shotgun....
How would that work with a magazine?
The police already know who can and cannot carry firearms. I fail to see how registration will help the police at all.Prove that the gun was legally purchased, and in fact belongs to YOU.
If not, you go straight to jail. No questions asked.
I thought you wanted to get illegal guns out of criminals hands .... or is the inconvenience of it all just not worth it to you?
Scratch a liberal, expose a fascist. It is so comforting to me to know that fascists are looking out for my interests by thumbing their noses at the constitution.no, more stringent, tougher requirements would never catch the odd criminal here and there.
same formula every time there's another school shooting. you guys go into hyper-defensive mode claiming that there is nothing wrong. yet the hyper-defensive mode says otherwise.
can't wait until you die, old man.
Background check would prove that you are legally permitted to buy the gun, and when registered to you on a central database it would provide law enforcement quick access to verify that you are in fact the lawful owner of said gun.If you are implying that registration would prevent those previously convicted of felonies from buying or owning guns, then what is the purpose of a background check? Are you just dumb, or is your proglodyte mind failing you?
How many laws did this kid break again?lol
remind me again about california's gun laws
and as a result of those laws which guns would be easy to get your hands on?
What is an illegal gun?Background check would prove that you are legally permitted to buy the gun, and when registered to you on a central database it would provide law enforcement quick access to verify that you are in fact the lawful owner of said gun.
Seems pretty simple to me. Don't we want to crack down on the "bad guys"? This would provide framework to possibly catch one of the "bad guys" with an illegal gun prior to using that illegal gun to carry out a crime.
you can't even explain how common sense gun safety is inconsistent with the constitution, you just spout off "constitution!!! arrrgggghhhhh!!!!" like some senile old coot.Scratch a liberal, expose a fascist. It is so comforting to me to know that fascists are looking out for my interests by thumbing their noses at the constitution.
Background check would prove that you are legally permitted to buy the gun, and when registered to you on a central database it would provide law enforcement quick access to verify that you are in fact the lawful owner of said gun.
Seems pretty simple to me. Don't we want to crack down on the "bad guys"? This would provide framework to possibly catch one of the "bad guys" with an illegal gun prior to using that illegal gun to carry out a crime.
I don't think "simple" means what you think it means. A background check would expose prior felony convictions, which would disqualify a felon from buying the gun. What purpose would registration serve?Background check would prove that you are legally permitted to buy the gun, and when registered to you on a central database it would provide law enforcement quick access to verify that you are in fact the lawful owner of said gun.
Seems pretty simple to me. Don't we want to crack down on the "bad guys"? This would provide framework to possibly catch one of the "bad guys" with an illegal gun prior to using that illegal gun to carry out a crime.
how do you punish someone for a legal action?Where are all these gun *checks* going to occur?
A felon CANNOT have a gun. It doesnt matter if it is his gun or someone elses gun. The bad guys have illegal weapons that they have no intention of registering....
You keep trying to punish LEGAL gun owners.
now your just playing dumbHow many laws did this kid break again?
Marijuana is illegal in California right?
Are you deluding yourself purposely or just trolling people?