UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you poor, poor slave. tell us all about how difficult it is to be a slave, you whiny little bitch.ALSO:.....
you poor, poor slave. tell us all about how difficult it is to be a slave, you whiny little bitch.ALSO:.....
says the douchebag who relies on a government disability check, medicaid, and food stamps.the government is a front for the biggest crime bosses. they are out to take your money and land. if you defend it you get it worse.
it wouldn't be in israel's self interest to be anything but collectivist.Do ALL the people in Israel think alike? That seems almost...like you are being a collectivist there Mr. Archie Bunker.
it wouldn't be in israel's self interest to be anything but collectivist.
it's a counterexample that proves you wrong. again.
Buck where are you politically? I'd pin you for a liberal, but some things you say seem to lean right.it wouldn't be in israel's self interest to be anything but collectivist.
it's a counterexample that proves you wrong. again.
He believes that might makes right. That could make him a member of either cult.Buck where are you politically? I'd pin you for a liberal, but some things you say seem to lean right.
yes, we all know thats what you do when you cannot argue against the statement and it's factual nature, you fap vigorously, give yourself a French Mistake (moneyshot in your own eye) and then post an image with no commentary, no context and no ideas behind it.
rob doesnt understand why anyone would value anything more than his own self-interest.The Americans weren't drafted, they knew the risks.
rob doesnt understand why anyone would value anything more than his own self-interest.
he indulges in the lysander spooner school of thought which places the personal desire for immediate gratification over any other consideration, and rejects anyone who actually believes in anything which does not have any immediately apparent self-interest at it's heart.
he seems to be otherwise sensible, but his deliberate obtuseness over matters of faith, dedication and devotion to any idea outside his narrow world-view is frustrating.
i agree 100%, initiating violence is wrong, stealing other people's shit is wrong too, kidnapping, raping and murdering lollies is wrong too. my personal conviction to not start shit doesnt do anything to stop those who DO want to start shit from in fact Starting Shit.Good Doctor, please brush up on the non initiation of aggression principle. Peace. Thank you for the pictures of smurfy ponies...Uncle Buck seems to be on pony picture strike and THAT really hurts.
I am embarrassed. i meant the opposite of proponent. If I remember, von Mises dodn't like socialism.In America (Where this discussion is relevant.), the Libertarian party states in their FAQ: "Libertarians believe in, and pursue, personal freedom while maintaining personal responsibility.". I'd say you're good, neer. In a discussion of American politics, Austrian definitions of libertarianism are irrelevant; as is any other country's political definition of said term. Origination is irrelevant unless you're debating the validity of the word as it is used, not the underlying concepts' validity. The principles of Libertarianism may be a misnomer by European standards, it does not change what it means in the US.
Allow me to ask you, Rob Roy ... there is one thing about the nonaggression principle that i do not understand. How to arrive at a physicist's definition of aggression that applies to everyone ... and then how to respond to those who would subvert it for personal gain without any coercion (the other anathema)? cnGood Doctor, please brush up on the non initiation of aggression principle. Peace. Thank you for the pictures of smurfy ponies...Uncle Buck seems to be on pony picture strike and THAT really hurts.
Well I pulled my source from the pit of hell to appease any Beck fans out there like Keynes. All it takes is a simple google search.I am embarrassed. i meant the opposite of proponent. If I remember, von Mises dodn't like socialism.
I remain curious. GOD implied that outside the US and its immediate sphere of influence, libertarianism was wound onto a socialist core. I would love to know how that works. cn
Perhaps my problem is that I viscerally don't get anarchism of any stripe. It cannot work within the frame of what I believe I know about human nature. cnWell I pulled my source from the pit of hell to appease any Beck fans out there like Keynes. All it takes is a simple google search.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Libertarianism
"Outside the United States, the term "libertarian" refers to left-wing anarchism."
btw I didn't implicitly call it socialism, I mentioned syndicalism as well. Communism also falls under that banner even more often than syndicalism does since it's now a minority philosophy.
I used to fell that way too, the more I learned about it the more it grew on me. It's basically just the absence of hierarchy applied within an existing system.Perhaps my problem is that I viscerally don't get anarchism of any stripe. It cannot work within the frame of what I believe I know about human nature. cn
With apologies, that doesn't work. All existing systems are hierarchic to some degree. Remove all hierarchy, and the system loses all meaning and capacity for effect. My opinion. cnI used to fell that way too, the more I learned about it the more it grew on me. It's basically just the absence of hierarchy applied within an existing system.
Not true, but that's a whole other talk. I'm a libertarian, not a purist on the anarchist front. If you want to understand how it would work, it never hurts to read.With apologies, that doesn't work. All existing systems are hierarchic to some degree. Remove all hierarchy, and the system loses all meaning and capacity for effect. My opinion. cn
I do like to read, but I have never found a screed, either sociaist or libertarian, that sufficiently accounts for plain human nastiness. Both systems seem to require team spirit, and I accept as axiom that there will be one or more people on the team surveying it for strip-mining.Not true, but that's a whole other talk. I'm a libertarian, not a purist on the anarchist front. If you want to understand how it would work, it never hurts to read.