abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Wars are business risks. They are fought to keep the world safe for capitalism.
Capitalism is war risk, and businesses fight, to keep the world safe from peace.Wars are business risks. They are fought to keep the world safe for capitalism.
Wars are business risks. They are fought to keep the world safe for capitalism.
Capitalism is war risk, and businesses fight, to keep the world safe from peace.
Could the US survive without a military industrial complex?The military industrial complex has interests far beyond weapons, oil for example.
Masturbate elsewhere, grown folks is chattin up in here.
Wars are fought for resources.
Who's serve is it, anyway?War is a racket.
I asked first, I'll answer your question as soon as you answer mine.Can the world survive with one?
orly? what resources did vietnam, korea and afghanistan have?The military industrial complex has interests far beyond weapons, oil for example.
Masturbate elsewhere, grown folks is chattin up in here.
Wars are fought for resources.
I don't care.AC, you never answered my question whether the US could survive without a military industrial complex, all I got was another question.
so, failing to defend vietnam's democratically elected regime, and it's fall to Marxism was the west winning, and forcing them to become a cheap manufacturing base for crap textiles.Vietnam and Korea are cheap manufacturers for the west. Besides capitalism vs communism is nowhere more evident than in those countries. Iraqi oil is only purchased by dollars. Lol@ the notion that Afghanistan has no resources. Business as usual.
LOL I didn't think so.I don't care.
Absolutely none of this long winded diatribe refutes my argument that war for business interests. See my sig and learn brevity. Then learn what petrodollar means.so, failing to defend vietnam's democratically elected regime, and it's fall to Marxism was the west winning, and forcing them to become a cheap manufacturing base for crap textiles.
man those capitalists are SUPER SNEAKY!
S. Korea is really just a puppet regime of the US which is why they are so rich and successful...
Even Sneakier!
N. Korea is being USED by the west as a boogeyman, to spur more consumption...
sneakier still!
afghanistan is a nation with vast resources (besides a strategic location on the old silk road...) but it's a SEEKRIT!!
so sneaky!
iraq's oil is traded in US dollars (like almost all oil is...) and this helps the us because....
ummm....
ohh, i got it!
when japan buys iraq's oil with their $'s, then iraq uses those $'s to buy machine parts from germany, and germany uses those $'s to buy japanese electronic components every time they make the trade, the US gets a taste...
ohh wait..
they could use rocks, or old safeway coupons, or David Hasselhoff CD's as long as the currency is accepted by each party, and everybody is confident that the currency wont fold up or get inflated before they use it to buy THEIR shit.
youre an idiot,.
If you have an argument you could just posit it instead of waiting for me to answer a retarded question.LOL I didn't think so.
none of your short winded soliloquy refuted the fact that we LOST vietnam to marxism, yet still somehow "won" in your fantasy worldAbsolutely none of this long winded diatribe refutes my argument that war for business interests. See my sig and learn brevity. Then learn what petrodollar means.
Oh wait, brevity is impossible to achieve when you're full of shit.
I never said that. I said it was fought for business interests. You see, our business class opposed the whole commy thing. We didn't have to win in order for them to now be a source of cheap labor. We just had to fight. Good job on turning your otherwise useless post into an opportunity to call me a Marxist though.none of your short winded soliloquy refuted the fact that we LOST vietnam to marxism, yet still somehow "won"