abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Wars are business risks. They are fought to keep the world safe for capitalism.
What are your thoughts on a basic income?
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
Doer
Well-Known Member
Capitalism is war risk, and businesses fight, to keep the world safe from peace.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
War is a racket.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
wars are wars, business is business.
unless you sell weapons, war is bad for business.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
The military industrial complex has interests far beyond weapons, oil for example.
Masturbate elsewhere, grown folks is chattin up in here.
Wars are fought for resources.
Masturbate elsewhere, grown folks is chattin up in here.
Wars are fought for resources.
Could the US survive without a military industrial complex?
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Can the world survive with one?
Doer
Well-Known Member
Who's serve is it, anyway?
I asked first, I'll answer your question as soon as you answer mine.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
orly? what resources did vietnam, korea and afghanistan have?
why has the US not received iraq's oil?
what profit was gleaned in resources from ww1 ww2 or the cold war?
your assumptions are based on marx's failed materialist view of society and history.
ASMALLVOICE
Well-Known Member
A small factoid to remember, war is waged for many reasons, none more so than gains. If there is a war going on, you can bet your bottom dollar, someone is gaining and gaining a lot. The system as a whole shifts the focal points (where we war at), but the outcome is still the same, gains to be made.
Whether the gains are monies, lands, minerals, principals, ethics or morals or as simple as want or perception of a want, all have an agenda to bring about a change that in turn leads to gains.
War does not decide who is right, only who is left.
Peace
Asmallvoice
Whether the gains are monies, lands, minerals, principals, ethics or morals or as simple as want or perception of a want, all have an agenda to bring about a change that in turn leads to gains.
War does not decide who is right, only who is left.
Peace
Asmallvoice
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Vietnam and Korea are cheap manufacturers for the west. Besides capitalism vs communism is nowhere more evident than in those countries. Iraqi oil is only purchased by dollars. Lol@ the notion that Afghanistan has no resources. Business as usual.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
I don't care.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
so, failing to defend vietnam's democratically elected regime, and it's fall to Marxism was the west winning, and forcing them to become a cheap manufacturing base for crap textiles.
man those capitalists are SUPER SNEAKY!
S. Korea is really just a puppet regime of the US which is why they are so rich and successful...
Even Sneakier!
N. Korea is being USED by the west as a boogeyman, to spur more consumption...
sneakier still!
afghanistan is a nation with vast resources (besides a strategic location on the old silk road...) but it's a SEEKRIT!!
so sneaky!
iraq's oil is traded in US dollars (like almost all oil is...) and this helps the us because....
ummm....
ohh, i got it!
when japan buys iraq's oil with their $'s, then iraq uses those $'s to buy machine parts from germany, and germany uses those $'s to buy japanese electronic components every time they make the trade, the US gets a taste...
ohh wait..
they could use rocks, or old safeway coupons, or David Hasselhoff CD's as long as the currency is accepted by each party, and everybody is confident that the currency wont fold up or get inflated before they use it to buy THEIR shit.
youre an idiot,.
LOL I didn't think so.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Absolutely none of this long winded diatribe refutes my argument that war for business interests. See my sig and learn brevity. Then learn what petrodollar means.
Oh wait, brevity is impossible to achieve when you're full of shit.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
If you have an argument you could just posit it instead of waiting for me to answer a retarded question.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
none of your short winded soliloquy refuted the fact that we LOST vietnam to marxism, yet still somehow "won" in your fantasy world
nor did you explain why S Korea is free and prosperous with plenty of fat sassy people dancing Gangnam Style, while marxist N Korea has people eating grasses and tree bark and getting shot trying to sneak into china...
brevity is useless when dealing with complex issues, which is why your bumpersticker slogans dont convince anybody except those who already suckle at the teat of Marx, like yourself.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
I never said that. I said it was fought for business interests. You see, our business class opposed the whole commy thing. We didn't have to win in order for them to now be a source of cheap labor. We just had to fight. Good job on turning your otherwise useless post into an opportunity to call me a Marxist though.
