Appalachia/West Virginia is not "left wing." Let's not confuse being members of the Democratic party with being leftists. Looking specifically at West Virginia, the national Democrats are vastly out of sync with what the people believe, which is why the state is shifting after being dominated by that party for so long. Republicans are already expected to win the senate seat there in 2014, and had Joe Manchin sat out the race last time, they would have already won the other seat.
This is what liberals buy after bitching about minimum wage.
- Thread starter Canna Sylvan
- Start date
Appalachia/West Virginia is not "left wing." Let's not confuse being members of the Democratic party with being leftists. Looking specifically at West Virginia, the national Democrats are vastly out of sync with what the people believe, which is why the state is shifting after being dominated by that party for so long. Republicans are already expected to win the senate seat there in 2014, and had Joe Manchin sat out the race last time, they would have already won the other seat.
Well said mate
Well, I could say to you not to mistake being religious for being conservative. The Appalachian people are religious, but they also support a left labor candidate. The Dems have not been offering that lately.
That's why there is debate. Are they really turning red, or are the democrats just offering up the candidates from a different part of the tent? The democrats have a very big tent. Appalachia is libderal excethe that they are very religious. The republicans scream religion, so they steal votes, but the people of WV see themselves as democrats.
Asheville, nc likes to think of it's self as the San francisco of the south east. Hippys everywhere pan handling, carving something out of wood, and a lot of homosexuality.
It is certainly a different breed of liberalsm that one finds in Appalachia, but they aren't conservatives.
see4
Well-Known Member
Your opinion on any topic means absolutely nothing. You are racist and proud of it.
I bet this is you...
[video=youtube;GKlDBi0cyIA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKlDBi0cyIA[/video]
So let me get this straight. To you, because a person looks around the globe and fails to notice even one place where blacks rule the country and also maintain a decent standard of living for the people, and draw from that observation and others that blacks are not equal, that somehow such a person has an intelligence failing?
In fact, blacks can be given a fairly prosperous country and manage to completely fuck it up rather quickly. South Africa, Hati, and various former European colonies on the african continent come to mind.
I don't give a shit what anyone says, that race, with it's utter failure to be able to feed itself without outside help, pretty much everywhere it exists, cannot be the equal of the other races which generally are able to produce an abundance of food and resources enabling prosperity.
How anyone can believe that all races are equal in all regard is representing the height of head-in-sand thinking.
You can totally put a dent in my argument by showing me a country of black folks that is a prosperous nation. Mexico is far ahead of any country composed primarily of blacks that I am aware of.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
The Bahamas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bahamas
90% black, third richest country in the americas.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Well, let us be Aliens watching, waiting....biding our time....bruuuuuuhhahhsshshahaaaa. A'hem.
We see one branch of humans in Africa, were subject to constant invasion and enslavement, under the banners of various crazy "gods."
To StarView, the dark ones, were the beginning of the monkeys called Man, but because they never left the equatorial homelands they sat out the Ice Ages.
When the inner Age warming began these pitiful pale ones that survived, had become very mean and possessive and seeking conquest and slaves.
The Vikings are seen from SpaceView, as the beginning of the madness phase of "civilization". Scholars on the home world first believed the pale ones were deranged and could not prevail. But, later it was understood that the privations of the Cold, had expressed some very aggressive genes. It is still not settled as to why the pale ones have never allowed the darker one to have their own freedom much less their own countries until this Stardate -4 zios.
Studies will continue, in parallel, with the Vikings / Zulu simulations, local circa 1002 - 2742
----------------------
....All in how we look at it. If we beat on all dogs, in general, is it any wonder all dogs look beaten on? And brother, these aren't dogs, but they have been beaten on, as sub-human, and never given a break. You are not looking at incompetency, you are looking at suppression, in every way, since the Flood.
We see one branch of humans in Africa, were subject to constant invasion and enslavement, under the banners of various crazy "gods."
To StarView, the dark ones, were the beginning of the monkeys called Man, but because they never left the equatorial homelands they sat out the Ice Ages.
When the inner Age warming began these pitiful pale ones that survived, had become very mean and possessive and seeking conquest and slaves.
The Vikings are seen from SpaceView, as the beginning of the madness phase of "civilization". Scholars on the home world first believed the pale ones were deranged and could not prevail. But, later it was understood that the privations of the Cold, had expressed some very aggressive genes. It is still not settled as to why the pale ones have never allowed the darker one to have their own freedom much less their own countries until this Stardate -4 zios.
Studies will continue, in parallel, with the Vikings / Zulu simulations, local circa 1002 - 2742
----------------------
....All in how we look at it. If we beat on all dogs, in general, is it any wonder all dogs look beaten on? And brother, these aren't dogs, but they have been beaten on, as sub-human, and never given a break. You are not looking at incompetency, you are looking at suppression, in every way, since the Flood.
see4
Well-Known Member
Don't you just hate when facts get in the way of bullshit? Glad someone on your team calls you out so I don't have to.
Yawn.....
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Cool Lovecraft meets Blavlotsky story, bro.
see4
Well-Known Member
Nothing in life is free.
That depends on your definition of free.
Nutes and Nugs
Well-Known Member
Nothing good is ever free.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Beautiful victimization ....the only excuse for not being able to learn is absence of will, not funds.
see4
Well-Known Member
Which I suppose depends on your definition of life. And nothing. lol.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
The Wonderful Whites of West Virginia are all right wingers.........sure buddy.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
how do you get a degree from an accredited university without funds?
bootstrap magic?
free market TROOF?
servicing 10-15 dudes per day at $20 a pop?
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
I partly agree with this. I think it's up to the individual to want to learn, but there are some institutions (Oxford, Harvard, Yale, Stanford, MIT, etc.) where leading experts tend to congregate and teach students. Not only that, but being exposed to that sort of education and developing that sort of will to want to learn lies heavily on each individuals parents during their childhood.
You can have all the will in the world and still never be exposed to the same quality of education as someone with unlimited funds