UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
don't you think that you are smart enough to determine when, rather than any state or federal government telling you when WHEN is?
Ron Paul Has A Legit Shot.
- Thread starter Dan Kone
- Start date
- Status
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
run on sentence.
also, 'should have', not 'should of'.
i don't know how many times i have warned about this, maybe three times.
but i am ready to merge the threads that are obvious 'ron paul' threads into deprave's thread, 'the truth about ron paul'.
should i allow goat sex porn as well?
obviously, as an outspoken ron paul supporter, this is ALL you would see.
thank you sir, may i have another?
close, but exactly wrong.
it is when people do not agree that they usually reply. take our conversation now, for example. you opened by expressing how you did not like my moderation of this section.
you did not like how i handle spam, you replied to it.
your own statement is disproven by your very actions.
this is barely understandable. what i get out of it is that you are upset. why are you upset? you still get a place to catch up on all the ron paul information you want, but it is all in one place. that makes it easier for you to find what you want, and all of us "haters" who dislike him can ignore that thread and enjoy the politics section more.
this is why i want to merge the threads. keep the paulites happy. keep the haters away from you poor people who don't like to listen to us cry about how much we hate him. make it easier for those who want an actual political discussion to avoid running into yet another thread that devolves into a ron paul debate, as the spammers so often turn threads into.
unless you have not been paying attention, a small group of people turn most every thread into a ron paul debate. the evidence is there, check for it.
sorry i am trying to stop spam.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
spam.
point proven.
goodnight.
i will be home in 2 or so days. in the meantime, i will check with the other mods, one of them a staunch ron paul supporter, about exactly how to handle the ron paul spam.
i don't think i am asking too much here.
deprave
New Member
I have to agree, nothing wrong with posting a video and writing about it but to just post videos constantly and not even write anything, many times the video not even being on topic is a bit out of hand and really sort of disrupts the thread. I will take the time to write out a very long well thought out post and then BAM someone posts a random video and says nothing, the thread goes to the next page and my long post is thus buried.
I don't think that post is exactly the best example as it is relevant and there is a little bit of text written, I think its kind of funny that is the "last straw" for unclebuck because the video sheds some light on his strawman bullshit lol.
I don't think that post is exactly the best example as it is relevant and there is a little bit of text written, I think its kind of funny that is the "last straw" for unclebuck because the video sheds some light on his strawman bullshit lol.
Sure Shot
Well-Known Member
Now I'm a spammer?
Fail!
My rep is solid, "Mr. Moderator".
"Point proven, goodnight"
That's a priceless gem.
Guess you have not the will to moderate only to make ridiculous claims.
You failed in all attempts to discredit the honorable Dr. Paul.
Otherwise, you wouldn't be projecting such negative energy.
Go look up the definition to Moderator. A moderator has a unbiased or non-partisan position.
You sir, have clearly staked a claim against Ron Paul on many occasions,
and I'm theorizing on many a thread. It must be exhausting trying to impose your perception
to multiple people at multiple times, with so much opposing views. So much so, you would like to concentrate
them all so you could narrow your own attack and maybe rest easier that your views can be forced upon others.
You disgrace your own title by trying to play both sides of the field to your own gain.
That's the exact mindset that people are awaking from and it's great to see it sprout up everywhere!!
If only we can relate the cause and effect our economic and foreign policies,
have on our individual freedoms, Ron Paul will win by a landslide!
Point proven. Good Day!
[youtube]UBngrfL0B6U[/youtube]
tryingtogrow89
Well-Known Member
All i see is post after post of your anti ron paul rhetoric on ron paul titled forums, maybe i should take it up with some other mods and admins because we're trying to figure out a way to go about handling your blatant excessive unclebuck anti ron paul SPAM.
budlover13
King Tut
i disagree with merging all Ron Paul threads. Strongly.
I would think most reading the Ron Paul threads do as well.
I quit reading when you singled out that I made a run on sentence there Uncle Buck. I'll just assume it's just more of the same.
sync0s
Well-Known Member
http://money.cnn.com/2011/12/30/news/kelly_clarkson_ron_paul/
Clarkson got blasted on twitter for the endorsement, bet this will make up for it.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
budlover13
King Tut
i totally understand what your saying as far as merging to clean up the forum a little. And for us "regulars", it would be fine imo. But for anyone cruising through or new members, it would appear that there isn't much support for Ron Paul on this site and that is misleading.
budlover13
King Tut
Maybe merge them per topic?
RP Economics
RP Foreign Policy
RP Social Issues
RP Legal Issues
RP Gov't Discussion
etc, etc.
RP Economics
RP Foreign Policy
RP Social Issues
RP Legal Issues
RP Gov't Discussion
etc, etc.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i will resist the urge to post a picture of a tube of vagisil, and instead simply point out that i would have no need to even look at anything ron paul (mush less respond) if it were not for a dedicated group of people who post excessive amounts of ron paul spam.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i think that if all the ron paul threads were merged into deprave's thread, 'the truth about ron paul', people would notice the several thousand posts and infer that the man has plenty of support on this site.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
maybe something like that would work.
just so that i don't have to click on an innocent sounding thread that is simply a well-disguised ron paul thread. i've had enough of deifying a guy who will lose the nomination and retire from congress this year.
budlover13
King Tut
Ok. i'll give you that lol.
At very least, a mega RP thread would be useless for the simple reason that it would be so huge. How could/would one find and follow a given topic?
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
Legal issues and Gov't discussion could probably be considered the same topic. That would bring it down to 4 threads. Then people would be able to keep track of which Ron Paul stuff should go in what thread. It would end the chaos. I don't think anyone has a problem with people wanting to discuss Ron Paul, it's the chaos of it spilling into every thread and people posting Ron Paul videos in threads unrelated to the topic that is the problem.
If you did merge them by topic, it actually might help the Ron Paul advocates post things in the right topic, allowing for better discussions of the topic. Also it wouldn't turn off posters who aren't interested. With 3-4 threads Ron Paul would still be the dominant topic on this forum, and the threads would likely be long so new people would know that Ron Paul is supported by many people here. And the discussions would be more coherent, so people would better understand Ron Paul on each of those topics.
Seems like everyone wins if that is done.
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
I like your idea of merging by topic very much. Actually that seems like something that benefits everyone, Ron Paul supporters included.
- Status