Senate Report: Hillary's State Dept Could Have Been Prevented Benghazi Attack

ginwilly · Jan 16, 2014

see4 said:
No. Not true. Why do you not think it possible his deductions are consistent throughout the year? What evidence do you have to support your assertion?

None, but there is also no evidence that they are. I am not claiming it's false, he IS claiming it's true and that's his proof. I'm just claiming it's not proof of anything other than on that one paycheck.

It's like I'm picking on your dad how steadfastly you are defending this.

fotolia_8939355_XS.jpg%3Fw%3D410%26h%3D410%26keep_ratio%3D1

google image of pay stub, not hard to find

see4 · Jan 16, 2014

ginwilly said:
None, but there is also no evidence that they are. I am not claiming it's false, he IS claiming it's true and that's his proof. I'm just claiming it's not proof of anything other than on that one paycheck.

It's like I'm picking on your dad how steadfastly you are defending this.

google image of pay stub, not hard to find

I am not defending UB, I am defending my point. My point is very very simple. Which is, UB made a claim, you called him a liar, he showed you a pay stub, and you continue to call him a liar without proof. Prove that he didnt pay 22%.

If what you are saying is that he needs to prove his claim, then I will go along with that. Which means you need to go after Finthere and ask him to prove he owns a million dollar business.

Stop being one-sided and hypocritical. Just be honest.

kelly4 · Jan 16, 2014

see4 said:
I am not defending UB, I am defending my point. My point is very very simple. Which is, UB made a claim, you called him a liar, he showed you a pay stub, and you continue to call him a liar without proof. Prove that he didnt paid 22%.

If what you are saying is that he needs to prove his claim, then I will go along with that. Which means you need to go after Finthere and ask him to prove he owns a million dollar business.

Stop being one-sided and hypocritical. Just be honest.

It means YOU should go after Finthere, if YOU are the one who is in doubt...

see4 · Jan 16, 2014

ginwilly said:
It's like I'm picking on your dad how steadfastly you are defending this.

I'd rather defend Finthere over my father. He's an ankle grabbing assclown. A rich prick, but a prick nonetheless.

see4 · Jan 16, 2014

kelly4 said:
It means YOU should go after Finthere, if YOU are the one who is in doubt...

No. Like your claim, I am taking his word for it.

Do you know why? Because I DONT GIVE A FUCK either way.

You girls cry about it like your life depends on it. I'm just making fun of you for it.

kelly4 · Jan 16, 2014

see4 said:
No. Like your claim, I am taking his word for it.

Do you know why? Because I DONT GIVE A FUCK either way.

You girls cry about it like your life depends on it. I'm just making fun of you for it.

Making fun of me? You are the one who says proof is not with the one making a claim, but on the one arguing the claim.

I'm going to play with my 18" penis now. It grew 3" this morning...prove it didn't.

Plus, I'm not crying about it, just making note that his picture of a pay stub means nothing...and making sport of you.

ginwilly · Jan 16, 2014

see4 said:
I am not defending UB, I am defending my point. My point is very very simple. Which is, UB made a claim, you called him a liar, he showed you a pay stub, and you continue to call him a liar without proof. Prove that he didnt pay 22%.

If what you are saying is that he needs to prove his claim, then I will go along with that. Which means you need to go after Finthere and ask him to prove he owns a million dollar business.

Stop being one-sided and hypocritical. Just be honest.

Hope you are using the royal You. I've never called UB a liar about his jobs, it doesn't even register a blip on the radar of things I care about.

The claim I'm making is if he claiming that as proof of anything other than he posted some random paystub on a pot forum that he must think we are stupid. Well, he does think that, that's obvious. He would have to think we are stupid to believe most anything he says.

Ever notice when you are talking to someone in real life and they tell you something absolutely ridiculous. you are more offended by the fact they think you are stupid enough to believe it than the fact they are lying to you? It's like that.

kelly4 · Jan 16, 2014

see4 said:
Because I DONT GIVE A FUCK either way.

Then why do you keep defending UB's position...even though that pay stub proved nothing?

see4 · Jan 16, 2014

kelly4 said:
It means YOU should go after Finthere, if YOU are the one who is in doubt...

Right. And YOU need to prove that UB is lying, if YOU are in doubt.

Glad we agree. Thanks for clarifying your position.

see4 · Jan 16, 2014

ginwilly said:
Hope you are using the royal You. I've never called UB a liar about his jobs, it doesn't even register a blip on the radar of things I care about.

Yes, I am using the royal You.

see4 · Jan 16, 2014

kelly4 said:
Then why do you keep defending UB's position...even though that pay stub proved nothing?

Have I showed you the retarded horse video? If not, you maybe nearing that.

see4 · Jan 16, 2014

kelly4 said:
Making fun of me? You are the one who says proof is not with the one making a claim, but on the one arguing the claim.

I'm going to play with my 18" penis now. It grew 3" this morning...prove it didn't.

Plus, I'm not crying about it, just making note that his picture of a pay stub means nothing...and making sport of you.

Yawn. You are full blown retard. Good luck with that.

kelly4 · Jan 16, 2014

see4 said:
Right. And YOU need to prove that UB is lying, if YOU are in doubt.

Glad we agree. Thanks for clarifying your position.

You should ask your buddy UB who needs to prove their side...you knowz you are wrong.

People have went round and round on this already. The consensus on here is that the person who makes a claim needs to prove it. Sorry that UB and the rest of us are not on your side on this one. You are one of the only ones arguing this. Accept you are wrong and move on.

Why does Ginwilly need to prove anything about Beenthere's business if it's you who doesn't believe Beenthere?

Learnz to comprehendz.

see4 · Jan 16, 2014

kelly4 said:
You should ask your buddy UB who needs to prove their side...you knowz you are wrong.

People have went round and round on this already. The consensus on here is that the person who makes a claim needs to prove it. Sorry that UB and the rest of us are not on your side on this one. You are one of the only ones arguing this. Accept you are wrong and move on.

Why does Ginwilly need to prove anything about Beenthere's business if it's you who doesn't believe Beenthere?

Learnz to comprehendz.

You STILL haven't answered a simple question. You talk in circles. Your own stupidity is getting in the way of holding an intelligent conversation. Answer the question. Is the burden on the accuser or the claimant. Answer it. You can't, you know you're wrong.

Your trolling is not very good.

kelly4 · Jan 16, 2014

see4 said:
You STILL haven't answered a simple question. You talk in circles. Your own stupidity is getting in the way of holding an intelligent conversation. Answer the question. Is the burden on the accuser or the claimant. Answer it. You can't, you know you're wrong.

Your trolling is not very good.

It's on the claimant, of course. If you claim the polar ice sheets have melted, you better be able to prove it. It's not my duty to prove they haven't melted. This directly contradicts what you posted in another thread.

You can't possibly be trying to tell me that you don't realize that you are the only one that I'm doing this to, are you? I do this because you are the only one saying that the burden of proof is on the other foot. To prove this, I have bumped the thread that you said this in. You shouldn't be able to call anyone Fin for a while.

You try to call me stupid, yet you are the one who

see4 · Jan 16, 2014

kelly4 said:
It's on the claimant, of course. blah blah blah

Ok, prove you have a pinball machine on the dark side of the moon. Hypocrite.

kelly4 · Jan 16, 2014

see4 said:
Ok, prove you have a pinball machine on the dark side of the moon. Hypocrite.

kelly4 said:
You can't possibly be trying to tell me that you don't realize that you are the only one that I'm doing this to, are you? I do this because you are the only one saying that the burden of proof is on the other foot.

I have a 20" weener.

see4 · Jan 16, 2014

kelly4 said:
I have a 20" weener.

Thus furthering my point. You seem to think I care, or that anyone cares for that matter. This is the underlying issue. You and Finthere seem to think this is a real issue, you continue to harp on it as if a minor claim that someone is taxed a certain rate. Why are you so concerned?

My point is this: you make a claim, that you have a 20" wiener, I honestly don't give a shit, so I will just assume what you are telling me is fact. But because you asshurt little boys seem to be so far up UB's ass you want to get to the bottom of something that nobody really gives a shit about.

Sad. So very very sad.

P.S. You owe me $0.13 for the use of Fin4. I have claimed copyright for the Fin prefix.

kelly4 · Jan 16, 2014

kelly4 said:
I have a 20" weener.

see4 said:
You seem to think I care, or that anyone cares for that matter.

Of course I think you care. You constantly talk about bulbous erections and like posts where people talk about big, bulbous erections.

I know you care!

UncleBuck · Jan 16, 2014

beenthere said:
the effective tax rate

beenthere said:
their effective tax rate....federal effective tax rate

oh, look.

that's you trying to change the goalposts!

WOOOOOOOPS!

because effective tax rate and federal effective tax rate are two different things, clayton.

seems like a genius intellect and master CPA like you would take care not to move the goal posts so blatantly, but you are too much of a dummy for that.

Senate Report: Hillary's State Dept Could Have Been Prevented Benghazi Attack

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Similar threads