Weird when i hit it it says it cant find server. I have said it befror if 19 passes I hope it is great for everyone I just fear that won't be the case. Is what your talking about officially part of 19 now or not? or is it something legislatur will introduce if it passes and try to get 2/3rds to pass it?
ok. fair enough. Here it is from another site.
any citation as to what you say about this tag fee? or how do you know about it?
dont care if you distrust me ive no reason to make shit up. If you have 5.99 you can go get the latest issue of high times or if you have a computer you can google the tax zip tie program. I could be missing something as i have not read the info on his link-as i honestly stated. I am unable to use his link but as I said I googled Tom's attatchments and amendments to prop 19 and read what i found and nothing persuaded me that he had changed the bill. I admit I could be missing something and invite you to copy and paste so i can be enlightened.
thanks for the link...I read a lot of it and will finish reading it word for word. My problem is that right at the beginning it says that this is a proposed addition to 19. Has the bill actually been changed or will it be? This is still a long complicated bill-I'm no lawyer but I WOULD VOTE YES ON THIS. if this amendment takes place i'm a yes vote
google > actual information, eh?
Google is only as good as the person using it. The internet is loaded with data, actual information. The trick is discerning what is what.
call the mendocino sheriff's dep then sheriff tom allman is in charge of the program
No. It's the implementation bill. It's conditional on prop 19 passing. It's designed to implement and clarify prop 19 to prevent chaos like we had right after prop 215. Basically this is to prop 19 what sb420 is to prop 215. Only difference is this time Ammiano got to write it. And he of course, kicks ass.
what are the chances of it going through AS IS? I read they need 2/3 majority ..is it their?
As long as prop 19 passes, it'll be very good. The only contentious point would be the tax cap on recreational use. It's been made clear that Ammiano will be leading the implementation charge on this. Meaning we are all in the best possible hands if prop 19 passes. There is no one in congress more friendly to herb.
say what...? thanks for the links and summary. this bill needed some cleaning up. some will still oppose, for many reasons, including: preference of prohibition's affect on price, hate of commercial anything especially herb, and other anti gov/tax/regulate folks. but this is a game-changer for many of "us" who oppose this bill simply for being poorly written (because it was).
Sometimes citizen written ballot initiatives are difficult to legally interpret or practically implement (like prop 215 for example). When that happens sometimes the state assembly will make a law that clarifies and makes practical implementation possible (like SB420 does for prop 215). For prop 19 rather than having years of chaos and law enforcement arresting people in an inconsistent manner because they are confused about the law (like with prop 215) Tom Ammiano already has this bill ready to go before it's even passed. He's the best possible person we could have doing this.
Sure, some people support prohibition because they make money off of it being legal. However this now gives them a benefit as well. They can continue what they are doing with no risk of law enforcement ruining their lives. Everyone wins.
AGREED.. Former 1/3 ownership in a small LLC right here, far from big bizness. Thanks again for the clarity
well, that answered one of my questions, but you skipped the more important one.
I will leave it to you to do a reality check. I have read his bill and it is not prop 19 it is something he will try to do if 19 passes. I said i was unable to access his link but read other articles that lead me to believe they hadn't fixed prop 19 and I stated I would like to know more dan kone then posted another link wich listed tom ammiano's bill and it's good the only problem is it is not part of 19 and would need a 2/3 majority to change 19. I read that asked dan kone his opinion on it and I responded. What does exposing myself have to do with this????
wrong he will need 2/3 to pass it as a addition or amendment and 215 is affected under 19 so aren't 18-21 year olds parents and anyone who needs to smoke in public places