Who said anything about "aid". I'm talking about weapons and military support.
I'm for sending humanitarian aid, taking in refugees, etc... that goes without saying.
If it weren't for the romancing from the US and other European countries with the old carrot on a string trick (a NATO membership that has zero possibility of coming to fruition without sparking WW3), Zolensky would have been forced to take a more diplomatic approach to Russia. When you openly tell your enemy they are too pussy to use nuclear weapons, from that point forward you stand alone. Period!!!! Ridiculous cowboy bullshit, those are not the words of a "hero", those are the words of a fool and his ego.
This is turning into another proxy war for American energy interests. Oil and money under the guise of "protecting democracy". Welcome to Ukghanitan!!
Haven't we had enough of this?
Seriously?
there will be no one to eat the food or wear the clothes you say is sufficient aid if we don't supply the Ukrainians with weapons...
no one promised Ukraine NATO membership, or even EU membership, except for frootloops who had no authorization to offer anyone anything, and Zelensky knows that, but you can't fault him for holding out unlikely hopes...
why should Zelensky be forced to take a diplomatic approach? putin could have made a diplomatic approach, could have made his case before the UN and NATO...
this has nothing to do with America wanting Oil...Ukraine is a transit country, not a producing country....the oil that russia produces is shipped through Ukraine in pipelines and tanker trucks...
Ukraine does produce a lot of food and iron and steel...not a sufficient cause to start a war imo...
do you read anything not from faux, newsmax, or oan?