why are conservative women so sexy next to their counterparts?

Drgreenz

Drgreenz

Well-Known Member
max420thc said:
bush was NOT a conservative ,he was a liberal,
we have been living in a socialist country for at least 60 years now.
it is turning into a full blown facist/communist police state now,
the constitution no longer binds the government to a set of rules.
most of the people i know who smoke pot are conservatives.i doubt it you know any of them as you do not run in the same influence of friends i do.yours are all stupid.
MOST investors are conservative. it keeps more money in their pockets that way,
investors run the country.or did, investors are leaving in droves faster than companys are shutting down and laying off people.
the majority of the people can vote to put their hand in someone else's pocket all they want.that does not mean the pocket is going to stay within the reach of the thief.
if liberals are so smart why are they not the majority of investors? i.e. THE ONES WHO HAVE THE MAJORITY OF THE MONEY.
liberals have picked the pocket dry and ran off the rest of their investment capital NOW WHAT DUMMYS?
Click to expand...
Finally another person who sees that the republican party is where the democrats were 60 years ago and the dems are just plain socialists. Take a look at the issues and most can see that being a conservative means you want less government, as in- no war on drugs, and less welfare. Whats going to happen when all the hard working conservatives in this country get tired of having their hard earned cash given to those who dont want to work hard?(ie: stereotypical welfare people)

"The roots of liberty must be watered in the blood of patriots" Thomas Jefferson
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
I was sent this the other day by a friend. Now i had no idea who Glenn Beck was since I'm not big on TV for information. My wife had to clue me in :mrgreen:. Apparently he has a radio show too. Anyways I watched this video and he explains in a few minutes the catastrophe which is the Obama presidency (6 weeks in!!!). Watch it and be very afraid. Numbers don't lie folks, pol's do. This train wreck is right around the corner. This guy Beck was a little too theatrical for my tastes, but it's for TV consumption so I'll give him a pass on that one. Not my cup of tea, but his info is dead on correct.

Here's the link.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62Vsgl6SUZ0


out. :blsmoke:
 
medicineman

medicineman

New Member
CrackerJax said:
I was sent this the other day by a friend. Now i had no idea who Glenn Beck was since I'm not big on TV for information. My wife had to clue me in :mrgreen:. Apparently he has a radio show too. Anyways I watched this video and he explains in a few minutes the catastrophe which is the Obama presidency (6 weeks in!!!). Watch it and be very afraid. Numbers don't lie folks, pol's do. This train wreck is right around the corner. This guy Beck was a little too theatrical for my tastes, but it's for TV consumption so I'll give him a pass on that one. Not my cup of tea, but his info is dead on correct.

Here's the link.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62Vsgl6SUZ0


out. :blsmoke:
Click to expand...
Glen Beck is just another right wing political Hack in the line up of Hacks on Fox, like Hannity and O'Reilly, dunderheads that spew hatred without any positive plans. Fox is just slightly right of the JBS and just as idiotic.
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
Like I said, numbers don't lie. Pay attention, that graph is 100% accurate. if that doesn't scare you, ur brain dead.


out. :blsmoke:
 
medicineman

medicineman

New Member
CrackerJax said:
Like I said, numbers don't lie. Pay attention, that graph is 100% accurate. if that doesn't scare you, ur brain dead.


out. :blsmoke:
Click to expand...
I guess you would have rather the market crashed all the way, the banks went under and ten thousand bucks wouldn't buy you a loaf of bread. I have no solutions, but at least Obama is trying to pull us out. What would your solution be Mr. genious??
 
medicineman

medicineman

New Member
CrackerJax said:
Okay, it's official. Med Man is brain dead. :lol:

yes, let's go from the frying pan into the fire and call it okay. :mrgreen:

out. :blsmoke:
Click to expand...
So, no solution, not even a hint, And you call me brain dead. Maybe we should have let everyone fail, afterall, when times were good, they weren't about sharing the profits with the taxpayers. I doubt that the failure of the big financial corporations would have bothered little old me much, in fact, it would have hurt those with some modicum of wealth the most. So...... Obama is really working for the wealthy, trying to save their asses, hell yeah, I say let them go eat shit. I have my guns and ammo, and a little stash of food, so my solution would be to let them fail and see where it all ends up. Maybe my million Dinars will be worth something someday soon.
 
joepro

joepro

Well-Known Member
medicineman said:
I guess you would have rather the market crashed all the way, the banks went under and ten thousand bucks wouldn't buy you a loaf of bread. I have no solutions, but at least Obama is trying to pull us out. What would your solution be Mr. genious??
Click to expand...
Let the liquidation start. Other companies will line up to buy into none tanted portfolios for 30-60 cents on the dollar.
Let the investors and the market do what they do..

or had the gov't invented its own insurance company and let the liquidation start for AIG. we could save the retirement funds and whats left of the pensions..

AIG will fall, its inevitable. we are only paying into a timeline of when AIG will fall.
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
Solutions do not include crashing the economy and devaluing the dollar beyond repair. Oops, too late.

I've already posted solutions before. Smack down the offenders (always). This BOLSTERS the business model. No bailouts for bad books and bad management. No saving bad mortgages (tough titty if you don't read your own contracts). Tax cuts all across the board (again bolsters business and creates jobs). Drop payroll taxes for a year (real money in EVERY workers paycheck and cuts unemployment). Drop Corporate tax rate to 10% ( corp's don't pay their own taxes, they merely pass them on to you).

Then sit back and watch the foreign capital POUR in and jobs fly through the roof.

Obama must surely know all this, but that doesn't jive with his socialist views. The fact that Communist China is chiding us says it all. In 6 weeks we are now LEFT of China....lawdy!!


out. :blsmoke:
 
TheDankness

TheDankness

Well-Known Member
TheBrutalTruth said:
Let's see, I think the very first line in my reply indicates that.

What's the hallmark of a bigot... stereotyping.

More embarrassing for you is the fact that you didn't even stereotype me correctly. No, you jumped feet first into a pile of shit created by faulty assumptions about my age.
Click to expand...
I told you, please quote me, tell me what you disagree with. Then I will respond. How did I stereotype you, quote it man. Your name calling is getting you nowhere, and I already responded to your bigot comment. You should look up the definition of bigot by the way, it has NOTHING to do with stereotyping. It has to do with intolerance , something a conservative should know a lot about... Shows what you know.:clap:
 
TheDankness

TheDankness

Well-Known Member
CrackerJax said:
So stereotyping is tolerant by your logic? just wondering....


out.
Click to expand...
No, its not tolerant, and that was not my logic. Applying a stereotype doesn't make you utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion, which is the definition of bigot. That was my logic. Not to mention I'm still waiting for someone to quote me stereotyping TheBrutalTruth...

Thanks for twisting my words around, that's really mature.:finger:
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
Definition: stereotypes - fixed impressions, exaggerated or preconceived ideas about particular social groups, usually based solely on physical appearance.

The danger in relying on stereotypes to guide our thoughts and actions stems from their being:
  • simplified ideas, whether negative or positive in nature
  • overgeneralizations that do not represent all, or perhaps even most individuals within a group
  • designed to enhance our own self-identity
  • the foundation for prejudice and discrimination
  • obstacles in getting to know others for whom they are versus who we think they might be
Gosh, my mistake... :lol:


out.
 
TheDankness

TheDankness

Well-Known Member
CrackerJax said:
the foundation for prejudice and discrimination
Click to expand...
So stereotyping is the foundation for prejudice and discrimination. I agree. What does this have to do with being utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion? I agree they tend to go hand in hand, but who says they have to? All of a sudden anyone that believes african americans are good athletes and have big dongs is a bigot? Anyone that thinks eastern Asians are mathematically advanced is a bigot? Doesn't seem like I'm being utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion when I make those comments to me... And once again, I never stereotyped TheBrutalTruth, which is what everyone is blindly claiming. Does anyone want to back up these accusations by quoting me, like I've been asking you to do?
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
Well if you agree that they go hand in hand, what are we arguing about? :lol: :peace:

I'll let TBT take out his own laundry.

Cut to National geographic film:

"Folks, we're here today to see if the elusive TBT will come out of the bushes. This is a wiley creature only known to prowl the political forums. he's a cunning predator, but we'll lay a liberal out as bait and see if we can catch a glimpse of him." :lol:



out.
 
TheDankness

TheDankness

Well-Known Member
CrackerJax said:
Well if you agree that they go hand in hand, what are we arguing about? :lol: :peace:
Click to expand...
Often I read my posts and realize I may not be communicating as effectively as I could be, case in point my last post. I was working on revising that even before I read your response. Read it again it makes more sense now.:bigjoint:
 
joepro

joepro

Well-Known Member
TheDankness said:
I already responded to your bigot comment. You should look up the definition of bigot by the way, it has NOTHING to do with stereotyping. It has to do with intolerance , something a conservative should know a lot about... Shows what you know.:clap:
Click to expand...
maybe you should re'read this thread from the start..where you will find "liberal intolerance" on display.

remember, conservatives are ugly on the inside, racist and in your book shouldn't be smoking pot since you proclaim it liberal.
....over a few fuckin photos.:finger:

practice what you preach, and show your tolerance to others.
You hate conservative views so much that you couldn't wait to grow up to have them yourself??

Stick a fork in this turkey, its done.
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
MMmmm I'll take a stab at that revised post.

It is the INFERENCE that is the bigotry. I.E.- All blacks are better athletes. The inference being that they are not that good at other things or worse the "JUNGLE" mentality is behind the stereotype. I'll leave the giant dong alone tyvm :mrgreen:

Stereotyping is a form of bigotry whether it is in a positive light or a negative type. Firstly, because it is simply wrong. One could easily offer the posit that there are more athletes at the professional level because there have been less opportunities for them to get ahead. If you saw that "sports" was your only way out of your neighborhood, this may give you that extra oomph to excel past your "white" competitor who is not as serious because other options are open to him/her.

out.
 
TheDankness

TheDankness

Well-Known Member
CrackerJax said:
MMmmm I'll take a stab at that revised post.
It is the INFERENCE that is the bigotry.
Click to expand...
No, the inference does not make me a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion. Therefore, the inference does not constitute bigotry. I am not, I assure you, a bigot. Statistically African Americans have more participants in professional sports than other races, so they are better athletes. How could this possibly be construed as bigotry?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top