desert dude
Well-Known Member
So, knives are effective implements of mass murder, just not int the US.
What a fucking moron.
Here is why "gun registration" is a freedom killer...
- Thread starter desert dude
- Start date
What a fucking moron.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Well, I don't know about if he is fucking a moron, but I doubt it. What if Buck and ABC, (where did he go?) could get their wish.
What does the vicious mind turn to next for mass killing.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2012/07/aurora_shooting_how_did_people_commit_mass_murder_before_automatic_weapons_.html
How did people commit mass murder before the advent of automatic weapons?
Often with fire. Revolutionary War veteran Barnett Davenport is widely considered the first mass murderer in U.S. history. On the evening of Feb. 3, 1780, Davenport burst into the bedroom of his employer, Caleb Mallory, and began to bludgeon Mallory and his wife with a club. When the club broke in two, Davenport beat the couple to death with Mallorys gun. If Davenport had stopped there, he would be remembered as just an ordinary killer; most criminologists define mass murder as the killing of at least three people in a single incident. After beating the Mallorys to death, however, Davenport burned the house down, killing their three grandchildren.
In 1932, Julian Marcelino, a Filipino immigrant of relatively small stature, managed to kill six and wound 15 on a Seattle street using only a pair of blades. In 1915, Monroe Phillips shot seven dead and wounded 32 with a shotgun in Georgia.
-----------
So as usual on this subject emotions push out the facts. Buck, 6 killed outright and 15 wounded with a blade rivals the ususal gun mass stuff we see every year.
No guns? Fire bombs and Blades. It is the history of humans you lack.
Beefbisquit
Well-Known Member
I'm pretty sure everyone is aware people can die by fire, and knives.
Didn't I just read you giving UB shit for bringing up Sandy hook because you regard it as an isolated case, and here you are bringing up some random Filipino immigrant story where a guy goes on a stabbing rampage. lol
The irony.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Hey, you seem to be in some weird world of keeping score and giving/getting shit. Maybe...widen your circle of friends?
And you seem to think you see irony as if it is meaningful for you. Good. Be Happy.
In broad middle, it often seems ironic or sarcastic to those that can't swim strongly to the deeper parts.
That is the very unusual (for you)....the true sincerity of Don't Care.
Doer
Well-Known Member
BTW, t'was not I who said sandy hook was isolated,
The press isolated it. The Hate Nuts wave it around.
I showed a chart where this goes on year after year, no matter what the weapon.
And we were doing adult talk about blades and mass murder in general. So, again you are swerving all over the topic.
The topic is not your personal view of me, btw.
The press isolated it. The Hate Nuts wave it around.
I showed a chart where this goes on year after year, no matter what the weapon.
And we were doing adult talk about blades and mass murder in general. So, again you are swerving all over the topic.
The topic is not your personal view of me, btw.
Doer
Well-Known Member
OK, back to adult talk.
The article continues.
Guns arent even the most lethal mass murder weapon. According to data compiled by Grant Duwe of the Minnesota Department of Corrections, guns killed an average of 4.92 victims per mass murder in the United States during the 20[SUP]th[/SUP] century, just edging out knives, blunt objects, and bare hands, which killed 4.52 people per incident. Fire killed 6.82 people per mass murder, while explosives far outpaced the other options at 20.82. Of the 25 deadliest mass murders in the 20[SUP]th[/SUP] century, only 52 percent involved guns.
The U.S. mass murder rate does not seem to rise or fall with the availability of automatic weapons. It reached its highest level in 1929, when fully automatic firearms were expensive and mostly limited to soldiers and organized criminals. The rate dipped in the mid-1930s, staying relatively low before surging again in the 1970s through 1990s. Some criminologists attribute the late-century spike to the potential for instant notoriety:
The article continues.
Guns arent even the most lethal mass murder weapon. According to data compiled by Grant Duwe of the Minnesota Department of Corrections, guns killed an average of 4.92 victims per mass murder in the United States during the 20[SUP]th[/SUP] century, just edging out knives, blunt objects, and bare hands, which killed 4.52 people per incident. Fire killed 6.82 people per mass murder, while explosives far outpaced the other options at 20.82. Of the 25 deadliest mass murders in the 20[SUP]th[/SUP] century, only 52 percent involved guns.
The U.S. mass murder rate does not seem to rise or fall with the availability of automatic weapons. It reached its highest level in 1929, when fully automatic firearms were expensive and mostly limited to soldiers and organized criminals. The rate dipped in the mid-1930s, staying relatively low before surging again in the 1970s through 1990s. Some criminologists attribute the late-century spike to the potential for instant notoriety:
Doer
Well-Known Member
OK, back to adult talk.
The article continues.
Guns arent even the most lethal mass murder weapon. According to data compiled by Grant Duwe of the Minnesota Department of Corrections, guns killed an average of 4.92 victims per mass murder in the United States during the 20[SUP]th[/SUP] century, just edging out knives, blunt objects, and bare hands, which killed 4.52 people per incident. Fire killed 6.82 people per mass murder, while explosives far outpaced the other options at 20.82. Of the 25 deadliest mass murders in the 20[SUP]th[/SUP] century, only 52 percent involved guns.
The U.S. mass murder rate does not seem to rise or fall with the availability of automatic weapons. It reached its highest level in 1929, when fully automatic firearms were expensive and mostly limited to soldiers and organized criminals. The rate dipped in the mid-1930s, staying relatively low before surging again in the 1970s through 1990s. Some criminologists attribute the late-century spike to the potential for instant notoriety:
The article continues.
Guns arent even the most lethal mass murder weapon. According to data compiled by Grant Duwe of the Minnesota Department of Corrections, guns killed an average of 4.92 victims per mass murder in the United States during the 20[SUP]th[/SUP] century, just edging out knives, blunt objects, and bare hands, which killed 4.52 people per incident. Fire killed 6.82 people per mass murder, while explosives far outpaced the other options at 20.82. Of the 25 deadliest mass murders in the 20[SUP]th[/SUP] century, only 52 percent involved guns.
The U.S. mass murder rate does not seem to rise or fall with the availability of automatic weapons. It reached its highest level in 1929, when fully automatic firearms were expensive and mostly limited to soldiers and organized criminals. The rate dipped in the mid-1930s, staying relatively low before surging again in the 1970s through 1990s. Some criminologists attribute the late-century spike to the potential for instant notoriety:
Which is probably the primary factor in school shootings. Crazy people wanting to make a mark on the world, why don't people realize the mind is the weapon?
Doer
Well-Known Member
like!!!!!!!>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>....................
Beefbisquit
Well-Known Member
I could care less what you post, just pointing out the fact that you berate peoples examples they provide, while providing the same quality of example for your own argument.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you could fertilize your fields many times over with all the bullshit you are full of and come up with even bigger strawmen.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
when was the last mass murder by machete or knife then?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
when was the last mass murder by telekinesis?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
there is nothing new under the sun.
see4
Well-Known Member
aint that tha truth. when you heading down to Gilbert next?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
probably in a month or two, need to pick up my fat ass cat (named fatty) who has been snowbirding in AZ.
see4
Well-Known Member
cool. well i should be around.
When was the last time a gun shot someone?