pubsters are NOT the fiscal conservatives they lead you to believe they are.How is this relevant? How does misleading and dishonesty help a scientific debate?
pubsters are NOT the fiscal conservatives they lead you to believe they are.How is this relevant? How does misleading and dishonesty help a scientific debate?
Anyone who thinks the ruling pubs are conservative weren't paying attention to what Bush spent, or spent on. He spent us nearly into oblivion. We are spending even more now...pubsters are NOT the fiscal conservatives they lead you to believe they are.
In this case though, it's harmful to the science, which is non-partisan by design. The focus shifts the debate from are we pooping in our kitchen to why are you lying about something so simple and obvious as money spent?Partisan lying is designed to be harmful to your aims.
Is it one of those where the counter is, how much did Obama spend while sucking off JZ? I'll pass.Well, it is a very partisan, inside joke. I doubt you would find it amusing. But, Sky's story to tell.
If it's a skytard joke, I highly doubt it's funny.Is it one of those where the counter is, how much did Obama spend while sucking off JZ? I'll pass.
Well, is it? There is plenty of lying in Science, Cold Fusion.In this case though, it's harmful to the science, which is non-partisan by design. The focus shifts the debate from are we pooping in our kitchen to why are you lying about something so simple and obvious as money spent?
Are you a dolt?.....Oh, yeah.............It never went from Neptune to Earth, as you stupidly claimed.So, Voyager 2 never went past Neptune?
You didn't quote NDT. You tried to claim him as a reference without citing anywhere he supported your idiotic statement that we detect and stop all objects approaching the Earth. We obviously can not. Even launching a rocket to reach the moon takes several years. I could also point out that you didn't even address my example off a total failure to detect a meteor. We have yet to do what you so blithely claim we can do. You "fact" is nothing but wishful thinking. You fail because, when confronted with someone pointing out the idiocy of your claim, you tried to make the argument about Voyager. Sucks to be you.The argument was about whether or not we could detect asteroids that could destroy earth. I quoted NDT and you basically said he was full of shit and you know better. I said it would take a long time (years) for an asteroid to reach us, and you brought up the 'Russian meteorite' incident as proof that we couldn't see a 10-15km asteroid approaching us within our reaction time (it took 12 years for Voyager 2 to go from earth to Neptune). I brought up that multiple organizations are scanning for that EXACT thing, e.g. NEO's.
We can detect things that are large enough to kill us in time to do something about them. Your opinion doesn't matter on the subject, it's a fucking fact.
Now you say I've changed the subject, and that I 'fail'. lol How so?
No I'm not, you are. No I'm not, you are. No I'm not, you are. No I'm not, you are. No I'm not, you are. Like dealing with a 5 year old.You seem stupid for trying to think.
Don't cry, baby.
She smells food.Just one of her legs weighs as much as the average adult human. How can she smile about that?
While you discuss people........lol.If you weren't, you simply wouldn't respond.. I mean, what's the point of replying to someone if only to "piss people off" as you say?
You're looking for the reaction to respond to, just like any troll on the internet
What you get out of that is nothing short of narcissistic. It adds to your ego.
From my experience in life, I've found that the less ego a person has, the better a person they are, usually in every aspect of their character; humble, welcoming, honest, reliable, passionate, etc. The people that attempt to fuel their ego, especially off the backbones of others, are worthless. They're not even worth consideration
"Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people." -Eleanor Roosevelt
you are an idiot.Geeze, I'm on the MMGW team and this little cartoon grosses me out. How do you expect to convince people with dishonesty?
The cartoon implies that everyone under consensus is working for a pittance funded by community organizers and eco-groups.... Add the governments expenditures and the picture looks quite different. We've spent over 70B through taxation just in this country alone, i have no idea how much it is when added to other governments spending. It dwarfs what the oil companies are spending.
We can win this debate with honesty and overwhelming data, when we argue from ignorance and deceit like in the cartoon, it adds fuel to the denier camp, and rightly so.
Yet you omitted it entirely in your deceptive post.Well, they want to debate. It is pretty stupid to think Halliburton will not benefit from moving infrastructure. Very checked out to think this political angle is some David against Goliath. Goliath and GodZilla against the people of the planet more like.
It is very dumb to think that there is not big govt (tax paid) money in this game.
maybe you should provide a citation that he's lying, which you have yet to do.In this case though, it's harmful to the science, which is non-partisan by design. The focus shifts the debate from are we pooping in our kitchen to why are you lying about something so simple and obvious as money spent?
your racism and hatred drips off each and every one of your posts.Is it one of those where the counter is, how much did Obama spend while sucking off JZ? I'll pass.
Because it turns out their "science" was pretty sketchy, requiring them to demonize those that disagree.How is this relevant? How does misleading and dishonesty help a scientific debate?
Does this inhibit your world-renowned rock throwing ability?Partisan lying is designed to be harmful to your aims.