we will return from under the ice in due time, refreshed and once again ready to bore you with bits of the real world.
we are seldom gone completely and are always watching.
Ya, I feel ya UTI.
Who exactly is your "we"?
Composed of various audacious accusations and questions with blatant lies and since its a new thread its bound to attract WeTarded's sea of stupid links. I know their tactic now, its the zerg attack.
HAHA Your too funny Zen!
You barely ever bring facts (with sources/links) to the table. Most of your information comes from your Dad which works for "KBR" or something. Its no wonder why your so biased, headstrong and closed minded. (Because your Dad is making good money working for KBR in the middle east, you can't come to terms about the reality of why he is there. Or maybe you ignore your logic because its easier that way. I know your a smart guy Zen)
I have no tactics besides to spread what I believe to be true. I'm still waiting for you people to debunk my "stupid links". Where are my blatant lies? Free free to point out any "false facts" which I post.
Do you remember the difference between facts and opinions? Its my opinion that the USA currently should not be at war with any countries in the middle east.
Its a fact that we didn't find WMD's in Iraq. Its a fact that Afghanistan is one of the worlds largest producers of opium/heroine. Its a fact that Iraq has vast oil fields. Its a fact that the USA put military bases on these two countries after
illegal wars. Its a fact that the USA has military bases on ~70% of the worlds counties. Its a fact that, presently, the only country to drop two nuclear bombs was the USA. Its a fact that WTC7 was a structural steel building and it collapsed at nearly free fall speed even though a hijacked plane didn't directly hit it. Operation Northwoods is a fact.
Operation Northwoods - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, was a false flag conspiracyUnited States government in 1962. The plan called for CIA or other operatives to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Castro-led Cuba. One plan was to "develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington". plan, proposed within the
This operation is especially notable in that it included plans for hijackings and bombings followed by the use of phony evidence that would blame the terrorist acts on foreign governments.
The plan states, "The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere." Operation Northwoods was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and signed by then-Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer, and sent to the Secretary of Defense.
Several other proposals were listed, including the real or simulated actions against various U.S military and civilian targets. Operation Northwoods was part of the U.S. government's Operation Mongoose anti-Castro initiative. It was never officially accepted or executed
In response to a request for pretexts for military intervention by the Chief of Operations of the Cuba Project, Brig. Gen. Edward Lansdale, the document lists methods (with, in some cases, outlined plans) the authors believed would garner public and international support for U.S. military intervention in Cuba. These are staged attacks purporting to be of Cuban origin.
"1. Since it would seem desirable to use legitimate provocation as the basis for US military intervention in Cuba a cover and deception plan, to include requisite preliminary actions such as has been developed in response to Task 33 c, could be executed as an initial effort to provoke Cuban reactions. Harassment plus deceptive actions to convince the Cubans of imminent invasion would be emphasized. Our military posture throughout execution of the plan will allow a rapid change from exercise to intervention if Cuban response justifies.
2. A series of well coordinated incidents will be planned to take place in and around Guantanamo to give genuine appearance of being done by hostile Cuban forces.
a. Incidents to establish a credible attack (not in chronological order):
(1) Start rumors (many). Use clandestine radio.
(2) Land friendly Cubans in uniform "over-the-fence" to stage attack on base.
(3) Capture Cuban (friendly) saboteurs inside the base.
(4) Start riots near the base main gate (friendly Cubans).
(5) Blow up ammunition inside the base; start fires.
(6) Burn aircraft on air base (sabotage).
(7) Lob mortar shells from outside of base into base. Some damage to installations.
( Capture assault teams approaching from the sea or vicinity of Guantanamo City.
(9) Capture militia group which storms the base.
(10) Sabotage ship in harbor; large fires -- napthalene.
(11) Sink ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims (may be lieu of (10)).
b. United States would respond by executing offensive operations to secure water and power supplies, destroying artillery and mortar emplacements which threaten the base.
c. Commence large scale United States military operations.
3. A "Remember the Maine" incident could be arranged in several forms:
a. We could blow up a US ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba.
b. We could blow up a drone (unmanned) vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters. We could arrange to cause such incident in the vicinity of Havana or Santiago as a spectacular result of Cuban attack from the air or sea, or both. The presence of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of the vessel could be fairly compelling evidence that the ship was taken under attack. The nearness to Havana or Santiago would add credibility especially to those people that might have heard the blast or have seen the fire. The US could follow up with an air/sea rescue operation covered by US fighters to "evacuate" remaining members of the non-existent crew. Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.
4. We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington.
The terror campaign could be pointed at refugees seeking haven in the United States. We could sink a boatload of Cubans enroute to Florida (real or simulated). We could foster attempts on lives of Cuban refugees in the United States even to the extent of wounding in instances to be widely publicized. Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement, also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government.
5. A "Cuban-based, Castro-supported" filibuster could be simulated against a neighboring Caribbean nation (in the vein of the 14th of June invasion of the Dominican Republic). We know that Castro is backing subversive efforts clandestinely against Haiti, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, and Nicaragua at present and possible others. These efforts can be magnified and additional ones contrived for exposure. For example, advantage can be taken of the sensitivity of the Dominican Air Force to intrusions within their national air space. "Cuban" B-26 or C-46 type aircraft could make cane-burning raids at night. Soviet Bloc incendiaries could be found. This could be coupled with "Cuban" messages to the Communist underground in the Dominican Republic and "Cuban" shipments of arm which would be found, or intercepted, on the beach.
6. Use of MIG type aircraft by US pilots could provide additional provocation. Harassment of civil air, attacks on surface shipping and destruction of US military drone aircraft by MIG type planes would be useful as complementary actions. An F-86 properly painted would convince air passengers that they saw a Cuban MIG, especially if the pilot of the transport were to announce such fact. The primary drawback to this suggestion appears to be the security risk inherent in obtaining or modifying an aircraft. However, reasonable copies of the MIG could be produced from US resources in about three months.
7. Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft should appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the government of Cuba. Concurrently, genuine defections of Cuban civil and military air and surface craft should be encouraged.
8. It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner enroute from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight.
a. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone.
b. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will being transmitting on the international distress frequency a "MAY DAY" message stating he is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO radio stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to "sell" the incident.
9. It is possible to create an incident which will make it appear that Communist Cuban MIGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft over international waters in an unprovoked attack.
a. Approximately 4 or 5 F-101 aircraft will be dispatched in trail from Homestead AFB, Florida, to the vicinity of Cuba. Their mission will be to reverse course and simulate fakir aircraft for an air defense exercise in southern Florida. These aircraft would conduct variations of these flights at frequent Intervals. Crews would be briefed to remain at least 12 miles off the Cuban coast; however, they would be required to carry live ammunition in the event that hostile actions were taken by the Cuban MIGs.
b. On one such flight, a pre-briefed pilot would fly tail-end Charley at considerable interval between aircraft. While near the Cuban Island this pilot would broadcast that he had been jumped by MIGs and was going down. No other calls would be made. The pilot would then fly directly west at extremely low altitude and land at a secure base, an Eglin auxiliary. The aircraft would be met by the proper people, quickly stored and given a new tail number. The pilot who had performed the mission under an alias, would resume his proper identity and return to his normal place of business. The pilot and aircraft would then have disappeared.
c. At precisely the same time that the aircraft was presumably shot down a submarine or small surface craft would disburse F-101 parts, parachute, etc., at approximately 15 to 20 miles off the Cuban coast and depart. The pilots returning to Homestead would have a true story as far as they knew. Search ships and aircraft could be dispatched and parts of aircraft found.""
I could spew more facts forth, but I have yet to see you(Zen) rebut any of my facts. Rather, Zen tries to undermine the person and his/her opinions. Instead of debating facts, Zen reverts to different tactics because you can't argue with the truth.
I'd like to hear more, how do you get your nieghbors to iniciate a "militia". Do you go door to door and say, "hey folks, we're starting a militia, do you want to join"? Then what? do you go to the nearest school and hold meetings talking about what you're going to do when they come for you to take you to the FEMA camps. You really should have some firearm training to be a real Militia. I just would like to know more, hell, I might start one here in my neighborhood, Viva Villa. Come on We, clue me in. I've heard of the Michigan milita, but they are a bunch of rednecks that live in the boonies of Michigan. Do you live in the "Boonies"?
Good for you MM! +Rep for being a true patriot! (I don't live in the boonies, I live in the suburbs....... Also, I know how to shoot a gun. I can shot an egg at 200 yards with my 17hmr. I can shoot a paper plate at ~500 yards with my 30-06'. I would say I'm good enough)
Let me first let you know that I didn't start the militia that I'm in. I found the militia because word of mouth.
It depends on where you live and what the peoples dispositions are like. If you live in a big city than you might have a harder time finding your local militia (if one exists). (Gangs and militia are two different entities.) If you live in the country and you are close with your neighbors than you might have an easier time starting a militia. (It depends on your community)
Information is key and the truth is contagious. A militia will not form if people don't understand what the problems are. My militia actually informed the police, local radio stations, local news papers, local schools and just about every local pertinent entity. You can inform them via email (or phone if you want) with any links that you know to be true. You don't want to spread false propaganda, so make sure you do your research on most (if not all) facts presented.
Another thing you could do is go to make signs out of poster board and post them places. If your really interested in starting your own militia you could post your phone number at public boards and state your
peaceful intent.
Maybe the best thing to do is making sure you inform your local police (anonymously, if you want), firefighters, schools, radio stations and etc. Persistence pays, so don't be shy to resend the same information a handful of times to the community.
Actually, I heard talk about my local militia through the radio a couple weeks ago. A pastor from a church was informing the public about current events and was recruiting men. He was mildly coy with his intentions, but the underlying principles where there. He was talking about RON PAUL and how the second ammendment was put forth to keep the gov't in check. He was also talking about the militia and was inviting everyone to his church. Basically he was informing and recruiting.
So, you could check out your local churches and talk to them. If they aren't informed than you can inform them (giving people the links help because there is too much info to remember and recite).
People have to learn things in order to know it. Many people are ignorant, but those which are mildly astute can make the correct deductions when presented with the right infomation. Remember that the militias intentions are not radical, but rather a conservative truth revolution that protects our constitutional rights that are being taken away by the gov't in the name of "your protection and security".
Time for me to go eat. Feel free to ask anymore questions.
The REVOLUTION has begun!
RON PAUL REVOLUTION
~PEACE~