f series
Well-Known Member
Idk man, spek and retiredguirlla are saying some random shit hahaA bit of reading and you’ll figure out who is on the level
Idk man, spek and retiredguirlla are saying some random shit hahaA bit of reading and you’ll figure out who is on the level
But very different in terms of content. Whom of the two do you favor, and why?Idk man, spek and retiredguirlla are saying some random shit haha
I've lived long enough to see some of those conspiracies turn out to be true though, I've never managed to fall off the earth.Flat Earthers are pretty much like all Conspiracy fans, plainly wrong and in this case, proven wrong millions of times over hundreds of years.
Later
Back to growing threads
They seem to be saying the same thing, I don't really care about what they're saying, honest.But very different in terms of content. Whom of the two do you favor, and why?
jesus They’re not saying the same thing at all. WowThey seem to be saying the same thing, I don't really care about what they're saying, honest.
Give us an example of a true conspiracyI've lived long enough to see some of those conspiracies turn out to be true though, I've never managed to fall off the earth.
CIA selling crack to blacksGive us an example of a true conspiracy
If you don't care, why did you bring it up in the first place? To make such claims, wouldn't it have been prudent to read through the entire thread, so that you could have gained significant and extremely clear context and storyline?They seem to be saying the same thing, I don't really care about what they're saying, honest.
Just reread what I said and you will get it.Hasn’t the CIA selling crack to blacks been proven? So not a conspiracy.
Possibly “to get a reaction”. He got one, so troll point scored.If you don't care, why did you bring it up in the first place? To make such claims, wouldn't it have been prudent to read through the entire thread, so that you could have gained significant and extremely clear context and storyline?
Not the case, I only read like 1-2 pages, but to me, there was no point to their conversation.Possibly “to get a reaction”. He got one, so troll point scored.
No worries. However the two posters you mentioned are on opposite sides of a basic cognitive divide.Not the case, I only read like 1-2 pages, but to me, there was no point to their conversation.
Got tired of if, talked some shit. Then you ask me my thoughts, basically trying to see who's "side" I'm on. As I said earlier though, I really don't care about their topic.
Not trying to troll, sorry if it came off that way...
I don't consider my post troll worthy personally, but if you do, sorry
Yeah I knew that, (hostility) it's just the particular post I saw had 1 person (A) trying to get the other (B) to prove his point, then it appeared person (A) took on person (B)'s point and defended it against person (B)No worries. However the two posters you mentioned are on opposite sides of a basic cognitive divide.
I missed that. Are you willing to give me a more detailed account of that?Yeah I knew that, (hostility) it's just the particular post I saw had 1 person (A) trying to get the other (B) to prove his point, then it appeared person (A) took on person (B)'s point and defended it against person (B)
Which I thought was hilarious.
This is why I was saying it was pointless, this is how the conversation appeared to me via the few text I read, maybe I got confused amongst all this stuff here. But yeah, I understood they were against each other