Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
well, you do for every other problem people cause for themselves, so we just assumed....Not sure i ever did?
well, you do for every other problem people cause for themselves, so we just assumed....Not sure i ever did?
Was just saying to my wife, all we need now is for China to posture in the disputed maritime area to call the USA's bluff and we have big shit.the U.S is not directly involved in this...this is a NATO issue..Biden volunteered to negotiate and macronroni had to jump in the spot light and play to putin's hand...so....
If NATO doesn't put more troops on the ground IF Russia invades Ukraine (and not the Separatists states) then its a green light to China to move in on Taiwan.
there, fixed that for you...
I'm not rejecting it at all. The overall message is strong. It was just a minor critique. I don't really like how money has become a reference for what's right or wrong. I said something critical about Musk in the Tesla thread and someone's reply was, "well I'm pretty sure he has more money than you, so...". Then again there was that guy that was arguing with someone here and he wanted to compare bank accounts, as if that's somehow the creator of truth. I think that mentality is connected to the demise of society, particularly in the US, so I'm a bit sensitive to it when I see it.Society's moral codes are a distillation of many learning experiences and people who follow them avoid mistakes others made in the past. Moral codes enable others to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past. As a person who makes a living carrying out experiments that often test conventional wisdom, careful study and understanding of the basis of that belief saves the cost of carrying out an empirical study on the subject to test it. Society benefits when people follow moral codes that are based upon good reason and the experience of others. Thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not bear false witness, for example. It's completely reasonable to question those codes. If one stops and thinks on the subject, it's not hard to figure out why they exist.
You are rejecting the statement by a government body made up of people who probably know more than you do on the subject. You did so due to your own belief that economic decisions should not be based upon morality. Isn't that simply following your personal moral code?
I'm not saying your are wrong or right, I'm saying your logic is muddled. Rejecting that paragraph because "economy" does not belong in a "moral argument" fails to convince because you brought no facts. Just your own bias against moral arguments.
My post suggests how to state that there are economic rights without mentioning money.I'm not rejecting it at all. The overall message is strong. It was just a minor critique. I don't really like how money has become a reference for what's right or wrong. I said something critical about Musk in the Tesla thread and someone's reply was, "well I'm pretty sure he has more money than you, so...". Then again there was that guy that was arguing with someone here and he wanted to compare bank accounts, as if that's somehow the creator of truth. I think that mentality is connected to the demise of society, particularly in the US, so I'm a bit sensitive to it when I see it.
You could certainly argue that it's projection, since I think the main selling point in gathering sympathy for Ukraine is the people and I also think that most people do too, or at least they should, and not so much about economics, but I'm sure there are many out there that care more about the situation from an economic perspective, even though I think it's a little bit of a shitty point of focus.
And, I'd hate to think that's what's happens as knowledge increases, one cares more about economics than people. That doesn't seem to come through in writings from the greats of history. Perhaps with knowledge of certain unfortunate realities comes a degree of being jaded. If that were the case, then I think I'd prefer to stay parked in naïve idealism.
in a fucked up way, caring about economics is caring for people...they both need stability, good trading partners, industry....whats good for the wallet is good for the peopleI'm not rejecting it at all. The overall message is strong. It was just a minor critique. I don't really like how money has become a reference for what's right or wrong. I said something critical about Musk in the Tesla thread and someone's reply was, "well I'm pretty sure he has more money than you, so...". Then again there was that guy that was arguing with someone here and he wanted to compare bank accounts, as if that's somehow the creator of truth. I think that mentality is connected to the demise of society, particularly in the US, so I'm a bit sensitive to it when I see it.
You could certainly argue that it's projection, since I think the main selling point in gathering sympathy for Ukraine is the people and I also think that most people do too, or at least they should, and not so much about economics, but I'm sure there are many out there that care more about the situation from an economic perspective, even though I think it's a little bit of a shitty point of focus.
And, I'd hate to think that's what's happens as knowledge increases, one cares more about economics than people. That doesn't seem to come through in writings from the greats of history. Perhaps with knowledge of certain unfortunate realities comes a degree of being jaded. If that were the case, then I think I'd prefer to stay parked in naïve idealism.
i hope you grow big beefy rock hard nugs like you do biceps... maybe you should let ukraine borrow some of those gunsyeah. i popped a pimple on my nose, and it started bleeding so i had to put ointment on it, then i went to go smoke weed.
putin "guaranteed" he wouldn't invade...till he decided to invade...you have to treat putin the same way you treat trump...every fucking word out of his mouth is a lie, until confirmed by at least three independent sources.Moscow is willing to negotiate terms of surrender with kyiv, Kremlin Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov. In exchange Ukraine would: a guarantee of neutral status and the promise of no weapons on its territory. Per RT.
i only workout the beauty muscles. i don't bother with legs.i hope you grow big beefy rock hard nugs like you do biceps... maybe you should let ukraine borrow some of those guns