Dr. Greenhorn
Well-Known Member
yeah....I usually stay away from these threads and stick to the grow room.... I get schooled in here!!! LOL peace man
I took 1 class on greek mythology and learned how generic some of the bible's stories were. For instance the story of Noah's Ark was almost a direct copy of a part of the story of Gilgamesh and the story of Gilgamesh is the oldest known work of literature.i have more belief that we came from aliens than a god created us. not even kidding...
the bible is a joke... of all the historians in jesus's day, not one wrote about him. the gospels were written centuries after jesus's supposed death. many religions mirror the bibles text to a T... it's sad people live every moment of their life to this book.
People do act good in the name of god but they have also acted very, very bad in the name of god as well. Why do you have to hope for a better life after this one? Why not make the life your living the best you can?yes dr greenhorn guessed right. FAITH
have FAITH in a better life after this one. Do good things, treat people with respect, if not for GOD do it for yourself and the feeling you get after helping someone out whether it be giving a few bucks away or sharing a few kind words of ecouragement.
God Bless
I think you have a Pantheistic view thereI have been asking the same questions for a while. More so I had been trying to prove Gods existence, and a benevolent existence at that. I finally came across Zen. Zen asks probably one of the most important questions I have ever heard Who are you, the real you, can you show me?.
Its tricky but gets the job done, we are talking about the real you, not the wannabe, changing, developing person etc.. The real you. Most would think its soul, yet the questions asks for a demonstration. It basically brings the question of God to your front door. Zen as Alan Watts said is concerned with the finger pointing at the moon. Quotes like The sword can cut everything but itself are a perfect point as to what it attempts to ask. We speak of belief, love, and all that jazz. Yet who is the one doing this?
After some consideration and a good smoke, I had an epiphany of an understanding. This is me, all of it. It is up to me to assume what me I wish to be, and this is only done in relationship to someone or something else. I am God, if you understand the definition of it. God the Creator separated in to separate matter to experience myself (Conversations with God- Donald Walsh)
The funny thing is I am human right now, but because I at some level have chosen that. If I chose or willed to be God, all I would have to do is lose the identity of the false self (The I am, what I am Not, thus I am) and understand the unity I have with All. If I did that though no more super highs, love, tears, drama and so on. Or maybe not, maybe I would be everything?
Would I be all the people in our lives? Since I know its only a role, an identity, that is the only way I can compare to being something more. In other words there is a self out there, a Me, that has done it. Defied space and time and became the universe and upon looking back said, hey I liked the ride, going to keep it. Its a loop anyways, the eternal loop of the Now. Every moment being re-created to eternity.
So from it you get various understandings about life. You realize first off you are who you are because of a relationship to something. Secondly, you control that relationship. You also realize that all the other yous out there, are you deciding to act as another person. Heck the future God You is here Now and we dont even see it. We cant see it because its us. The moment we ask who is God, it means that we consider God to be a separate force, separate from our own consciousness. How could that be, if that was the case how would God even know of us? How do we know of us?
The whole thing leads to the process of freedom. The action of getting free will. For the most part we have sold our free will to an game console, a car, or even another human being to be happy (marriage). Most of us run away from something. Rarely do any of us run towards ourselves, or at least an understanding of. Its called attachment. Definition of self with something that appears to be external to our self. LSD points out that maybe we are not so separate, so do various modern theories of physics. But I find peace in knowing that: Hey if we didnt do this whole thing to begin with, I wouldnt be here right now. Would I?
The argument is basically simple. How certain are you that this world you live in is real? Blue Pill -- Red Pill
I don't get what you mean, if you believe in evolution you should believe that anything is possible. Why put limits ?i don't believe we came from monkies. thats for sure. i believe in a little evolution... but not changing species
I think in the end... no one will know the truth. That's the great trick of it all. It is all a canard.Well certainly everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Only in the end will everyone know the truth. So I'm takin' bets!
I do keep it friendly, but if ppl just do it again, anyway, then its needs to be corrected.I believe faith is godsgarden validation......not all people are led by the "seeing is believing, bring me facts" etc. etc. philosophy.....as for me, I am still searching for answers ....... another thing, if you ask to keep things civil, be sure too follow your own advice peace out
and seeing as how every religion we know of, has a god, their term for god translated still means "god" so by having it in the pledge isn't hurting any one in any way, since translated it IS the same word. so even for atheists saying they dont like it cuz they have no god, then in turn infringes on those who do, so dont pledge your allegiance skip the words, you do make good points, but i mean by taking it away from everyone, the only ppl you havent havent taken away from is the atheists.What someone else chooses to believe is largely irrelevant to me. In other words, it's none of my business.
The First Amendment addresses the right to believe, or to be free from belief altogether.
My problem is with those who would hold fast to the First Amendment in defense of their own beliefs, but refuse that same protection to people who believe differently, or not at all.
In God We Trust on our currency? Bullshit!
Public subsidizing of churches with property tax exemptions and non-profit status? Bullshit!
My state Legislature opens every session with a prayer offered by a different minister brought in each day specifically for that purpose. Bullshit!
When I served, a soldier who needed counseling had no choice but to go see the Chaplain. Bullshit!
And let's not forget the Pledge of Allegiance with the phrase 'under God' included. When it was added is not important. The fact is it was added - by Congress. Bullshit!
Interesting rebuttal. And kudos to you for encouraging a civil debate on a volatile subject.and seeing as how every religion we know of, has a god, their term for god translated still means "god" so by having it in the pledge isn't hurting any one in any way, since translated it IS the same word. so even for atheists saying they dont like it cuz they have no god, then in turn infringes on those who do, so dont pledge your allegiance skip the words, you do make good points, but i mean by taking it away from everyone, the only ppl you havent havent taken away from is the atheists.
That always troubled me, too. Canada has hockey players on their money, as well as a portrait of the living Monarch. ... Nothing about God, as far as I know.The simple fact that my money makes a liar out of me is hard evidence that my right to be free of belief has been infringed.