America, the only country to use nuclear weapons. Did they save lives?

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
You dont surrender under your own terms retard.
What fucking part of that dont you understand.
If you cannot grant a defeated foe that he may spare an emperor considered by the Shinto religion to be a living god, than you are committed to exterminating the entire race of Japanese people to the very last. If that was the policy, than why are you so strongly clinging to the idea that you are of a righteous and noble people.

You must be from Florida...
 

Mindmelted

Well-Known Member
Where i live has nothing do with anything fucktard.
Name me one nation that surrendered under thier own terms!
 

Mindmelted

Well-Known Member


Amen,But this post will be deleted.
We are not allowed to wish harm to another asshole retard on this site.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Where i live has nothing do with anything fucktard.
Name me one nation that surrendered under thier own terms!
Name one nation that is unwilling to accept terms of surrender that include sparing the leader. USA

Even fucking Napoleon would let monarchs live.

Even fucking Pizarro got in trouble for killing a monarch.

You must be from Florida.
 

Mindmelted

Well-Known Member
Name one nation that is unwilling to accept terms of surrender that include sparing the leader. USA

Even fucking Napoleon would let monarchs live.

Even fucking Pizarro got in trouble for killing a monarch.

You must be from Florida.


And you must be a abortion that lived.

You need a little more makeup to hide those clothes hanger marks on your neck fucktard.

Silly little american hating douchebag.

You are the poster boy for swalloing jizz than taking it in the pussy.

Please slap your mother for all of us......:finger::finger::finger::finger::finger::finger::finger::finger::finger::finger::finger::finger::finger::finger:
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
If you feel so bad about it then please put a bullet through your skull, that would at least make me feel better.
Since I feel so bad about it, instead of committing suicide, like 18 veterans a day who also feel bad about it, I'll just spread some good old cold hard truth around. Hopefully it bothers you.
 

laughingduck

Well-Known Member
This is Truly An Incredible Story

In 1986, Peter Davies was on holiday in Kenya after graduating from Northwestern University. On a hike through the bush, he came across a young bull elephant standing with one leg raised in the air. The elephant seemed distressed, so Peter approached it very carefully. He got down on one knee, inspected the elephants foot, and found a large piece of wood deeply embedded in it.

As carefully and as gently as he could, Peter worked the wood out with his knife, after which the elephant gingerly put down its foot. The elephant turned to face the man, and with a rather curious look on its face, stared at him for several tense moments. Peter stood frozen, thinking of nothing else but being trampled. Eventually the elephant trumpeted loudly, turned, and walked away.

Peter never forgot that elephant or the events of that day.

Twenty years later, Peter was walking through the Chicago Zoo with his teenage son. As they approached the elephant enclosure, one of the creatures turned and walked over to near where Peter and his son Cameron were standing. The large bull elephant stared at Peter, lifted its front foot off the ground, then put it down. The elephant did that several times then trumpeted loudly, all the while staring at the man.

Remembering the encounter in 1986, Peter could not help wondering if this was the same elephant. Peter summoned up his courage, climbed over the railing, and made his way into the enclosure. He walked right up to the elephant and stared back in wonder.

The elephant trumpeted again, wrapped its trunk around one of Peter legs and slammed him against the railing, killing him instantly.

Probably wasn't the same elephant.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
And you are only capable of being a asshat.


And i highly doubt 18 soliders a day are taking thier life over the nuked JAPS.....:finger::finger::finger::finger::finger::finger::finger:
18 veterans a day are committing suicide, actually that was the rate in 2006, it has risen drastically. Nobody knows why exactly. My guess is they "feel bad". I'm sure it has nothing to do with "nuked JAPS". My guess is they regret "protecting" stupid fucking mouth breathers from Florida or killing starving barefoot Muslim teenagers. Could be either one.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
If it was political, that's pretty fucked up..

Actually, really fucked up.

If it was to save American lives and avoid an invasion of the Japanese Islands, still fucked up, but I guess if it saved lives it was for the best..

If it saved American lives while costing many more Japanese lives (which I'm sure it must have), that's fucked up, too..

If it saved American lives while saving Japanese lives, well, that would be the best outcome, right?

From the looks of it, it may have saved American lives (debatable), but it doesn't seem like it saved Japanese lives.. So, somewhat detestable.


It's always a grey area with war.. the sad reality. And yet, those who oppose abolishment of war stand in its defense using exactly the same examples...
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
If it was political, that's pretty fucked up..

Actually, really fucked up.

If it was to save American lives and avoid an invasion of the Japanese Islands, still fucked up, but I guess if it saved lives it was for the best..

If it saved American lives while costing many more Japanese lives (which I'm sure it must have), that's fucked up, too..

If it saved American lives while saving Japanese lives, well, that would be the best outcome, right?

From the looks of it, it may have saved American lives (debatable), but it doesn't seem like it saved Japanese lives.. So, somewhat detestable.


It's always a grey area with war.. the sad reality. And yet, those who oppose abolishment of war stand in its defense using exactly the same examples...
"it may have saved American lives (debatable)" ...??? I am simply amazed. Study Operation Downfall. That is what we avoided! More to the point, it completely turns your unfortunate impression around ... that dropping those two bombs cost more Japanese lives than not dropping them did. The sheer stubbornness of the Japanese can be appreciated by the fact that it took a second atom bomb to convince them that surrender was preferable to national and cultural gyokusai. cn
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
"it may have saved American lives (debatable)" ...??? I am simply amazed. Study Operation Downfall. That is what we avoided! More to the point, it completely turns your unfortunate impression around ... that dropping those two bombs cost more Japanese lives than not dropping them did. The sheer stubbornness of the Japanese can be appreciated by the fact that it took a second atom bomb to convince them that surrender was preferable to national and cultural gyokusai. cn
Read American Ceasar. Macarthur was appalled by Truman's refusal to except Japanese surrender.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Not the first time Corncob Doug was wrong. Jmo. cn
How was he wrong if the Japanese were looking for the same armistice that Truman ignored for months, then signed?

They wanted to surrender, yet you're asserting they were hard headed and needed a double nuking to surrender. The terms they wanted ultimately were the terms agreed upon. Therefore the delay had absolutely no purpose other than demonstrating our power which is a pretty way of saying terror.
 
Top