self defense? because the bad guy has a gun so you need a gun? then he needs a gun bigger than your gun, so do you now need a gun bigger than his? nobody should have guns, at least not a civilian. and hunting, with a gun, i mean whatever. imo hunting with a gun is cheating anyway...
well, that's certainly an opinion.
And when you've passed the NY Times and spent even 5 mins in the last year watching MSNBC, that's when you know you've had a lobotomy and can truly call yourself a liberal.
You don't know what the argument is. The 9th Amendment is very clear. We have all Rights. We grant the govt some power. The 2nd A is about military weapons, specifically. SCOTUS DC vs Heller. M-16 is mentioned. And I'm afraid you know nothing of asymmetrical warfare. It ain't the weapons it's the balls. OK a hint, for the under-informed.
They can have my gun if they want it, I'm a little more worried that they'll take my weed away and me with it. Now that's a concern! Worrying about the goober-ment taking my gun away is really a funny joke. WTF have you been eating?
I'm gonna say, you have never seen the elephant. Never been invaded. Never been held at gun point. I have been, 3 times now, in 3 different parts of the country. You can see the rifling...never mind.
How many of these weapons are legally obtained?
We don't trust the US govt. Where have you been? No one trust the govt. The govt does not trust us. They are not suppose to. Don't step in the bullshit.
Really? I notice you round off the numbers to an even 3,000 - i guess after 3,000 lives lost get a little redundant, huh?
If for whatever reason I need information from an encyclopedia I prefer Britannica for that reason. Better yet, there's these things called books..
actually the 9th amendment is not very clear, as it states "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people". it was actually just a compromise between Federalists and Anti Federalists, as Hamilton wrote, Why should a Bill of Rights "declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do?". it pertains more to privacy than to guns specifically.You don't know what the argument is. The 9th Amendment is very clear. We have all Rights. We grant the govt some power. The 2nd A is about military weapons, specifically. SCOTUS DC vs Heller. M-16 is mentioned. And I'm afraid you know nothing of asymmetrical warfare. It ain't the weapons it's the balls. OK a hint, for the under-informed.
WE take the weapons from those WE kill. Thus it is ever so in lopsided warfare. WE are not afraid of this govt. They are afraid of US. That's why all this numb-nut gun banning talk....fear from those elected. All the lies are based on fear including the one about how much ammo one NEEDS.
Please know we will go after this govt WE elected with sticks and stones if WE NEED TO. Human waves. WE will draw the worlds attention. So, don't step in the bullshit. These clowns can say what they want. Freedom of speech.
Specifically this means that Laws that are seeking to tell us what we need, have to be put against the "common good" in every case. And the common good here is a bunch of armed citizens. That is the 2nd Amendment.
So, you are falling for the wrong agreement, seems to me. You don't know how many rounds are needed in a 2nd A situation. No one does. So, that is not to be infringed on the Federal level and it won't be. And the same thing goes for hunting. That's not 2nd A. There is no right to hunt with a firearm.
Keep and bare - 2nd A.
Right to life, and chase happiness - Preamble
ALL other Rights not mentioned =- 9th A
What we need is an early education on Rights. Early gun safety awareness in kindergarten is what we need.
You have been sold down the TV opinion river. Swim back. It's not too late.
