Is it Possible That the U.S. Government Staged the Boston Marathon Bombing?
- Thread starter MidwesternGro
- Start date
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
You didn't "operate in the USA" to pick up your wife either, ehh Chesus?
Sorry, you asked for all this by letting the Duke out the other night, you McFuckingRetard.
Doer
Well-Known Member
ricky1lung
Well-Known Member
....come closer, closer.....ok....stand still.....now.....pull my finger.
Nah, I will let you wallow in your own filth
Samwell Seed Well
Well-Known Member
Doer more like no clue'er right guys . . . . . insert (honky laughing)
Figong
Well-Known Member
My view.. charter or not, the CIA exists, and will continue on per status quo. That said, am happy to see the CIA fully function as they have been - that goes back to my previous statement/view which is: Terrorists/those who commit treason have no rights, and if it takes waterboarding and electrocution to gather intel that's valid and matches SIGINT - one less potential 9/11 or similar on our hands.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
If the CIA wants info on you they just farm it out to Britain or Australia. No charter violated there if an ally just happens to have info on you.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Figong
Well-Known Member
Agreed, but there's times where extraction team or clandestine set just don't have time to go half way around the world.. and for that, they do it themselves and then pop off a drone.
echelon1k1
New Member
No, they just ask the NSA. They're tapped into your communications backbone. They don't farm that out to regularly not something that can now all be done remotely and by computer.
That little work around on a charter violation is generally only used after the fact.
kpmarine
Well-Known Member
In an interesting twist: the CIA's nation building is the major reason that Iran hates us. Look up "operaion ajax" sometime. Afterward, you will be less surprised by following military actions.
Doer
Well-Known Member
There is no doubt WE tinker big time with other societies for our self interest in self-rule. It really does help to see both sides and not take sides. Iran will never forgive us, nor Cuba, etc.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Just a word, and if you have no other, it too is rhetorical.....feel me?
MojoRison
Well-Known Member
Yes I do...and to be precise, rhetoric is more than just a word.
Doer
Well-Known Member
My forum friend, I am only trying to understand what you saw as rhetorical.. But, more interesting , by far are your views on rhetoric itself.
various uses
history of
main forms
But, if you mean the constant backbiting is rhetorically repetitive and boring, well, I agree with that, whole heartedly.
various uses
history of
main forms
But, if you mean the constant backbiting is rhetorically repetitive and boring, well, I agree with that, whole heartedly.
MojoRison
Well-Known Member
Yes. Basically I see people "colouring" the facts in order to suit their argument.
From my understanding, rhetoric is the art of conversation and I see very little of that at times.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Yes, and a few of us can discuss the art and science of rhetorical devise...I think there are 7 (?) classical approaches.
And we see every single kind of false argument there is. I tire of pointing it out..the ad homims, strawmen, base sophisters, etc but the itch to fight and not discuss, I just have to ignore.
So people can't speak without shaking a fist under your nose. I hardly call that debate and certainly not discussion.
Cheers!
And we see every single kind of false argument there is. I tire of pointing it out..the ad homims, strawmen, base sophisters, etc but the itch to fight and not discuss, I just have to ignore.
So people can't speak without shaking a fist under your nose. I hardly call that debate and certainly not discussion.
Cheers!