Is it Possible That the U.S. Government Staged the Boston Marathon Bombing?

Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
MidwesternGro said:
"University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach Ali Stevenson told Local 15 News, “They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about. “It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill.”
The news station also reports that Stevenson “thought it was odd there were bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines.”​
Stevenson then describes hearing the explosions as he ran away from the scene, having just completed the marathon.​
If this report is accurate, it clearly suggests there could have been some degree of prior knowledge of the bombing, which killed two people and injured at least 23.​
The fact that the explosions were preceded and overlapped by a”drill” of an almost identical nature mirrors other major terror attacks, such as the 7/7 bombings in London.​
It is important to emphasize that the New York Times recently reported that most of the recent domestic terror plots in the United States “were facilitated by the F.B.I.,” suggesting that today’s incident in Boston may have been part of such an operation." www.prisonplanet.com/eyewitness-authorities-announced-drill-before-boston-explosions.html​
Click to expand...
Wonderful treaty on why no one should believe anything the New York Times publishes
 
DoctorGregHouse

DoctorGregHouse

Member
MidwesternGro said:
"University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach Ali Stevenson told Local 15 News, “They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about. “It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill.”

The news station also reports that Stevenson “thought it was odd there were bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines.”

​
Stevenson then describes hearing the explosions as he ran away from the scene, having just completed the marathon.​
If this report is accurate, it clearly suggests there could have been some degree of prior knowledge of the bombing, which killed two people and injured at least 23.​
The fact that the explosions were preceded and overlapped by a”drill” of an almost identical nature mirrors other major terror attacks, such as the 7/7 bombings in London.

​
It is important to emphasize that the New York Times recently reported that most of the recent domestic terror plots in the United States “were facilitated by the F.B.I.,” suggesting that today’s incident in Boston may have been part of such an operation."

www.prisonplanet.com/eyewitness-authorities-announced-drill-before-boston-explosions.html
​
Click to expand...
God, I don't care what one guy said. All anyone has to go on is this one quote, this one interview from a local news station half a nation away. Who is this guy? Why should we take his word for it? And did you see the end of the Marathon? It was packed. Surely at least one other person would've heard something. His story stinks of BS, and it's pathetically hilarious that that's all the conspiracy nuts have to go on.

But whatever, go ahead and call me a "sheeple" for questioning it.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
No that's red paint.....I don't watch videos of news. But, if you are shocked that these advertiser promoted "newz" feeds are lying and tapping dancing for a living.....that's not all.

They are the main focus of the Lobby-Lifestyle complex. The only agenda of Newz is market segment emotion tampering.
 
G

gagekko

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
No that's red paint.....I don't watch videos of news. But, if you are shocked that these advertiser promoted "newz" feeds are lying and tapping dancing for a living.....that's not all.

They are the main focus of the Lobby-Lifestyle complex. The only agenda of Newz is market segment emotion tampering.
Click to expand...
So... you didn't watch the video but are commenting about it anyway?
 
T

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
gagekko said:
CNN Caught Red Handed

[video=youtube;SbqVqI1cWXc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbqVqI1cWXc[/video]
Click to expand...
Presuming the premise is correct, that this is the same person being interviewed, why would that be suspicious? The bombings occurred in very close proximity to the second event, so isn't it plausible that a local resident was also at the marathon? Moving on, most people are unwilling to be interviewed about anything by the media. Is it unsurprising that a willing person at both events would seek out the cameras? As a final logical observation, why wouldn't they just pay another actor their relatively tiny fee instead of putting the same person on twice in such an obvious gaffe?

Of course, I didn't see the news report name the person being interviewed. Why presume they're the same person just because there's some physical similarity? Having picked the wrong person out of a photo lineup after seeing someone in person for a time far longer than both of those clips combined, I definitely wouldn't conclude that this is the same person based on the videos or the screenshots extracted from them.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
tokeprep said:
Presuming the premise is correct, that this is the same person being interviewed, why would that be suspicious? The bombings occurred in very close proximity to the second event, so isn't it plausible that a local resident was also at the marathon? Moving on, most people are unwilling to be interviewed about anything by the media. Is it unsurprising that a willing person at both events would seek out the cameras? As a final logical observation, why wouldn't they just pay another actor their relatively tiny fee instead of putting the same person on twice in such an obvious gaffe?

Of course, I didn't see the news report name the person being interviewed. Why presume they're the same person just because there's some physical similarity? Having picked the wrong person out of a photo lineup after seeing someone in person for a time far longer than both of those clips combined, I definitely wouldn't conclude that this is the same person based on the videos or the screenshots extracted from them.
Click to expand...
Don't be ridiculous, it's clearly the same woman and arguing otherwise is retarded.
 
G

gagekko

Well-Known Member
tokeprep said:
Presuming the premise is correct, that this is the same person being interviewed, why would that be suspicious? The bombings occurred in very close proximity to the second event, so isn't it plausible that a local resident was also at the marathon? Moving on, most people are unwilling to be interviewed about anything by the media. Is it unsurprising that a willing person at both events would seek out the cameras? As a final logical observation, why wouldn't they just pay another actor their relatively tiny fee instead of putting the same person on twice in such an obvious gaffe?

Of course, I didn't see the news report name the person being interviewed. Why presume they're the same person just because there's some physical similarity? Having picked the wrong person out of a photo lineup after seeing someone in person for a time far longer than both of those clips combined, I definitely wouldn't conclude that this is the same person based on the videos or the screenshots extracted from them.
Click to expand...
Haha... Are you for real? You must be a government employee.

boston.jpeg
 
T

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
gagekko said:
Haha... Are you for real? You must be a government employee.

View attachment 2640562
Click to expand...
Your case would be stronger if you found more evidence to support the claim. But that probably isn't possible. Part of this is just seeing what you want to see, whether it's there or not. If you want to believe it's the same person, that's that. If you're suspicious, there's nothing there that's convincing.

Considering that victims of crime--many of whom had close, intimate, and sometimes sustained contact with their perpetrators--pick the wrong people out of lineups and photo books at an alarmingly high rate, I don't trust my ability to identify a person from video shot at different angles in different lighting at different times of day.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
tokeprep said:
Your case would be stronger if you found more evidence to support the claim. But that probably isn't possible. Part of this is just seeing what you want to see, whether it's there or not. If you want to believe it's the same person, that's that. If you're suspicious, there's nothing there that's convincing.

Considering that victims of crime--many of whom had close, intimate, and sometimes sustained contact with their perpetrators--pick the wrong people out of lineups and photo books at an alarmingly high rate, I don't trust my ability to identify a person from video shot at different angles in different lighting at different times of day.
Click to expand...
Cockwaffle, you are obviously some kind of poorly designed machine.
 
G

gagekko

Well-Known Member
kpmarine said:
God knows that nobody outside of Boston was at the marathon; It's not a major national event or anything. His theory of her living in Watertown is totally plausible. Outside of that, it's "shabby reporting" as the next likely cause.
Click to expand...
Not gonna argue with you... Not worth it... Just a difference of opinion I guess.
 
G

gagekko

Well-Known Member
tokeprep said:
your case would be stronger if you found more evidence to support the claim. But that probably isn't possible. Part of this is just seeing what you want to see, whether it's there or not. If you want to believe it's the same person, that's that. If you're suspicious, there's nothing there that's convincing.

Considering that victims of crime--many of whom had close, intimate, and sometimes sustained contact with their perpetrators--pick the wrong people out of lineups and photo books at an alarmingly high rate, i don't trust my ability to identify a person from video shot at different angles in different lighting at different times of day.
Click to expand...
ditto ^^^
 
T

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
Dude, it's the same woman.

Im not saying it's some nefarious plot, she's probably just an attention seeker (you Yanks LOVE getting on tv) but its fucking CLEARLY the same woman.
Click to expand...
It's exactly that kind of certainty that leaves innocent people rotting away in jail for crimes they didn't commit, because the victim emphatically and emotionally declared that it was the same person.

Your certainty means nothing because it's grounded in nothing except the weak power of your eye comparing one image to another image.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top