Oops on global warming

You know what I love? When the eco-loon lemmings on here are making arguments at the exact moment that new scientific data is being released that completely guts their arguments. Now that we can completely dismiss this lunacy, we can get on to some environmental issues that are based on actual facts and sound science.
 
UncleBuck said:
yeah, i thought the same thing the other day.

they are always the first to dismiss the well-accepted theory when it is cold out, but go oddly silent once a massive fucking heat wave starts killing people over several nations.

the line of thought that weather = climate is a fallacy, but it is a telling one.
Click to expand...


so you are saying last weeks WEATHER phenom is proof that the climate is changing?:clap:
 
tet1953 said:
I love it when naysayers point at blizzards in the midwest and here in the northeast as proof against global warming. Well, of course it's snowing, it's winter and it's cold. The important part is the increase in precipitation. Increased frequency of large winter storms supports climate change theory.
Click to expand...

...he says with a straight face during a heat wave....oh boy.

surely increased winter weather proves that the world is warming, durp-de-derrrr
 
tet1953 said:
The larger and more frequent storms and lots more precipitation does, yes.
Click to expand...

yep that proves it. definitely the suv's fault that we had a heat wave....you should be an astronomer, or a astrologer, or ampedextrious, or what ever they call the guys on the 6 oclock news that tell us its gonna get hot in july....
 
There will be a huge snowstorm this winter, somewhere, which will surely prove that man has harmed the atmosphere!!
 
MuyLocoNC said:
Scientists are in it for the grant money, ask any of them and they will tell you, toe the line and play up the MMGW garbage and money abounds... deal in reality and good luck.
Click to expand...

can you please explain to me why NOAA and NASA both pay prominent skeptic roy spencer for his work then?
 
UncleBuck said:
can you please explain to me why NOAA and NASA both pay prominent skeptic roy spencer for his work then?
Click to expand...
3 years late, and interestingly this is the same guy you lampoon as a jesus freak regularly.

credible enough for NASA and NOAA, but not credible enough to cite as a scientist...

it boggles the mind how you can be so duplicitous.
 
Dr Kynes said:
3 years late, and interestingly this is the same guy you lampoon as a jesus freak regularly.

credible enough for NASA and NOAA, but not credible enough to cite as a scientist...

it boggles the mind how you can be so duplicitous.
Click to expand...

i have you as well on record stating that the scientists purposely put out pro-AGW reports to scoop those sweet research stipends, and that you don't get funded if you don't toe the line.

so what gives? why would they put a skeptic on the payroll?

:lol:

yet another one of your senseless talking points in ruins.
 
UncleBuck said:
i have you as well on record stating that the scientists purposely put out pro-AGW reports to scoop those sweet research stipends, and that you don't get funded if you don't toe the line.

so what gives? why would they put a skeptic on the payroll?

:lol:

yet another one of your senseless talking points in ruins.
Click to expand...
you "have me on record" stating that when you put "global warming" in your grant proposal, you grant gets approved.

google "ground squirrel study" +global +warming and see how this field has exploded thanks to the global warming grant bonanza.
 
Dr Kynes said:
you "have me on record" stating that when you put "global warming" in your grant proposal, you grant gets approved.

google "ground squirrel study" +global +warming and see how this field has exploded thanks to the global warming grant bonanza.
Click to expand...

so you're now claiming that you have never echoed the same sentiment as muyloco?

:lol:

keep in mind, there is a search function on RIU and it does find your posts.
 
Dr Kynes said:
you "have me on record" stating that when you put "global warming" in your grant proposal, you grant gets approved.

google "ground squirrel study" +global +warming and see how this field has exploded thanks to the global warming grant bonanza.
Click to expand...
Google Scholar gave me two results only. One paper from 1999 and one from 2014.
http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?hl...udy"+global+warming&btnG=&as_sdt=1,5&as_sdtp=

Zhe shi caomei.
images
 
nevermind, i think i found it.

http://www.craigsteiner.us/

524772_4418241208867_192170779_n.jpg


the most wildly hyper partisan douche i could imagine.

is it any wonder this cockknuckle is from highlands tanch, colorado?

:lol:

nice "science" there, muyloco.

he's a software developer and rabid hyper-aprtisan. seems like you copy most of your talking points directly from this guy.

so sad.
 
UncleBuck said:
nevermind, i think i found it.

http://www.craigsteiner.us/

524772_4418241208867_192170779_n.jpg


the most wildly hyper partisan douche i could imagine.

is it any wonder this cockknuckle is from highlands tanch, colorado?

:lol:

nice "science" there, muyloco.

he's a software developer and rabid hyper-aprtisan. seems like you copy most of your talking points directly from this guy.

so sad.
Click to expand...
Can you cum on my face and ask me to blow bubbles?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

desert dude
Global luke warming
2 3 4
Replies
79
Views
2K
UncleBuck
UncleBuck
S
Why Do Call Centers 'Get It'?
5 6 7
Replies
125
Views
10K
schuylaar
S
desert dude
global warming stalled...
2
Replies
35
Views
1K
Red1966
Red1966
jeff f
give us more stimuli, right mame?
2 3 4
Replies
73
Views
3K
Dan Kone
Dan Kone
SirGreenThumb
Lawmaker Says That Bicyclists Contribute To Global Warming
Replies
11
Views
682
cannabineer
cannabineer
Back
Top