I use Mayan Microzyme (have to start aerating some today, in fact) but it is not actually a plant food. It is a bacterial-enzymatic complex, containing non-pathogenic aerobic and anaerobic bacteria that assist in biological nitrogen fixation, nutrient mineralization, breakdown of salts, increase in soil organic matter, enhanced nutrient uptake, produces hydrogen to regulate pH, etc. So it will allow for reduced fertilizer applications (especially those containing nitrogen), but you still must supply some kind of micro-nutrient formulation or ensure sufficient materials are worked into the soil which are capable of providing those nutrients.
First of all, you should maybe consider not being so defensive (and erratic). Not everybody here is 'hating', especially not myself. What I am saying is that much of what you are saying is something of a ridiculously extremist approach to organic gardening. It can be as simple or as complicated as one wants to make it. I feel that 'beginners' may glean more by educating themselves as best they can over a period of time; throughout which they could be using commonly available, less expensive and still fully organic materials including things like feather meal, poultry manure, guanos, and even blood, bone and fish meals. As the depth of knowledge increases, so can their customization of the components they use.
To exclude animal (herbivore) derived nutrients seems a lot like a rash over-reaction to me. Cannabis grown with such fertilizers, if grown properly should smoke just as clean and smoothly, and taste just as good. If it does not, one reason could be because you've convinced yourself something alone the lines: "oh no! this bud wasn't grown veganically *cough* *cough*".
Biomagnification is a problem that we humans introduced to the environment in the first place. Even so, it hardly applies to such things as poultry manure and bat guano. The most affected animals are the predators at the top of the food chain, not the primary consumers of the second trophic level. The problem is that substances that would biomagnify, such as chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides like DDT, have long elimination half-lives and high lipid solubility (as well as being sparingly/not soluble in water). Thus, a compound like DDT can enter an organism from its environment, even if levels are low. The compound is not eliminated from the organism, and it is eaten by a predator. Except the predator will eat several of these organisms, not just one or two. Whatever DDT was in those organisms is now inside of the predator, where it will be transferred and stay trapped in adipose (fat) tissues. This predator also happens to be prey for another carnivore, that will again eat several of such animals. Whatever DDT had accumulated in the fatty tissue of the original predators (turned prey) now ends up being transferred and trapped in the fat tissue of whatever is higher in the food chain; so on and so fourth and DDT levels skyrocket many times over as we move up the food chain.
This is practically a non-issue for primary consumers (chickens, cows, bats, horses), which are almost at the bottom of the food chain and only eat plant matter having virtually zero fat content.
...google it friend.